169hands
MENU
suited

K4s

54.9%
Equity vs one random hand — #59 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
54.9% · #59
6-handed (5 opponents)
19.0% · #54
9-handed (8 opponents)
13.5% · #52
Chen score
5
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
115 of 168 hands

K4s (king-four suited) wins 54.9% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 59th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 34.9% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 19.0% and its rank moves to 54; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 13.5% for rank 52. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin K4o runs at 52.2% (rank 75), a gap of 2.7 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.7 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is K7o at 55.3%, and directly below is A2o at 54.9%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K4s is a favourite against 115 of them and an underdog against 53. Its best matchup is Q4o at 75.9% and its worst is KK at 11.6% — a spread of 64.3 points, which is why calling K4s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.0%.

K4s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against Q4o at 75.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K4s with only 26.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 27 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 12.3 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 19 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K4s lands +3.9 points from the middle of the pack, and 58 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 54.9% against one opponent, 36.4% against two, 22.3% against four and 13.5% against eight. That last figure is 122% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K4s reads as 54.9% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 54.9% against one opponent down to 13.5% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%54.9136.4227.6322.3419.0516.4614.9713.58opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
K4s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankK4s equityvs 50%Shape
AA115.8%-34.2PAIR VS CARDS
KK211.6%-38.4PAIR VS CARDS
QQ331.4%-18.6PAIR VS CARDS
JJ431.4%-18.6PAIR VS CARDS
TT531.8%-18.2PAIR VS CARDS
99631.9%-18.1PAIR VS CARDS
88732.8%-17.2PAIR VS CARDS
AKs826.8%-23.2DOMINATED
77932.9%-17.1PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1036.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
AJs1136.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
AKo1227.7%-22.3DOMINATED
ATs1336.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
AQo1439.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
AJo1538.7%-11.3HIGH CARD
KQs1629.0%-21.0DOMINATED
661733.2%-16.8PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
ATo1938.7%-11.3HIGH CARD
KJs2029.8%-20.2DOMINATED
A8s2137.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
KTs2230.9%-19.1DOMINATED
KQo2330.2%-19.8DOMINATED
A7s2437.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
A9o2540.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
KJo2631.3%-18.7DOMINATED
552733.6%-16.4PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2855.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
A6s2937.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
K9s3032.9%-17.1DOMINATED
A8o3140.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
A5s3235.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
KTo3332.4%-17.6DOMINATED
QTs3455.2%+5.2HIGH CARD
A4s3527.5%-22.5DOMINATED
A7o3639.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
K8s3735.9%-14.1DOMINATED
A3s3839.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
QJo3957.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
K9o4034.3%-15.7DOMINATED
Q9s4156.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
A5o4238.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
A2s4340.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
K7s4438.5%-11.5DOMINATED
A6o4539.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
JTs4654.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
QTo4757.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
444835.9%-14.1PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4941.7%-8.3HIGH CARD
A4o5028.4%-21.6DOMINATED
Q8s5157.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
K8o5237.5%-12.5DOMINATED
A3o5342.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
K5s5444.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
J9s5555.2%+5.2HIGH CARD
Q9o5659.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
JTo5756.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
K7o5840.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
A2o6042.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
Q7s6158.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
K6o6243.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
K3s6352.9%+2.9HIGH CARD
J8s6456.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
T9s6554.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
Q8o6660.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
336748.0%-2.0PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6858.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
K2s6953.1%+3.1HIGH CARD
J9o7058.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
K5o7147.1%-2.9HIGH CARD
Q5s7259.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
J7s7357.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
T8s7455.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
K4o7552.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
Q7o7661.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
Q4s7771.7%+21.7DOMINATING
J8o7859.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
T9o7956.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
K3o8055.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
Q3s8162.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
Q6o8261.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
98s8354.3%+4.3HIGH CARD
T7s8456.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
J6s8559.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
K2o8656.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
Q5o8762.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
228849.0%-1.0COINFLIP
Q2s8963.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
J5s9058.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
T8o9158.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
J7o9260.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
J4s9371.5%+21.5DOMINATING
97s9455.2%+5.2HIGH CARD
Q4o9575.9%+25.9DOMINATING
T6s9657.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
J3s9762.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
98o9857.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
T7o9959.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
Q3o10065.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
87s10155.0%+5.0HIGH CARD
J6o10261.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
J2s10362.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
96s10456.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
Q2o10566.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
J5o10661.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
T5s10759.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
T4s10871.0%+21.0DOMINATING
97o10958.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
86s11056.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
J4o11175.6%+25.6DOMINATING
T6o11260.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
T3s11362.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
95s11457.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
76s11555.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
J3o11665.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
87o11757.5%+7.5HIGH CARD
T2s11862.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
85s11957.4%+7.4HIGH CARD
96o12059.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
T5o12161.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
J2o12265.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
94s12371.0%+21.0DOMINATING
75s12456.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
T4o12575.5%+25.5DOMINATING
93s12662.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
86o12758.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
65s12855.8%+5.8HIGH CARD
95o12960.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
84s13069.9%+19.9DOMINATING
T3o13165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
92s13262.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
76o13358.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
74s13468.7%+18.7DOMINATING
T2o13565.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
64s13667.6%+17.6DOMINATING
85o13760.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
54s13866.5%+16.5DOMINATING
83s13962.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
94o14075.3%+25.3DOMINATING
75o14159.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
82s14262.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
73s14361.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
65o14458.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
93o14565.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
53s14659.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
63s14760.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
84o14874.1%+24.1DOMINATING
92o14965.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
43s15069.0%+19.0DOMINATING
74o15172.7%+22.7DOMINATING
54o15270.4%+20.4DOMINATING
72s15362.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
52s15461.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
64o15571.7%+21.7DOMINATING
62s15662.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
83o15765.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
42s15870.3%+20.3DOMINATING
82o15965.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
73o16064.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
53o16162.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
63o16263.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
32s16364.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
43o16472.8%+22.8DOMINATING
72o16565.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
52o16663.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
62o16765.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
42o16874.5%+24.5DOMINATING
32o16967.6%+17.6HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
K4o52.2%

FAQ

What is the equity of K4s?

54.9% against one random opponent, which ranks it 59 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 19.0%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 13.5%.

How much better is K4s than K4o?

K4s is worth 54.9% and K4o 52.2%, a difference of 2.7 points — rank 59 versus rank 75.

How many of the 168 other hands does K4s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 115 hands and an underdog against 53. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 42 distinct figures — Method