T7s

T7s (ten-seven suited) wins 50.7% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 84th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 49.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 19.0% and its rank moves to 57; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 13.4% for rank 53. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin T7o runs at 48.1% (rank 99), a gap of 2.6 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.6 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 98s at 50.8%, and directly below is J6s at 50.5%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T7s is a favourite against 71 of them and an underdog against 97. Its best matchup is 72o at 75.6% and its worst is TT at 15.1% — a spread of 60.5 points, which is why calling T7s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 55 at 50.1%.

T7s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 75.6%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them QTs, which leaves T7s with only 28.9%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 40 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 16.5 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 14.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T7s lands -0.3 points from the middle of the pack, and 83 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 50.7% against one opponent, 34.9% against two, 22.0% against four and 13.4% against eight. That last figure is 121% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T7s reads as 50.7% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.