93s

93s (nine-three suited) wins 43.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 126th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 74.6% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 14.2% and its rank moves to 120; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 10.0% for rank 114. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin 93o runs at 39.9% (rank 145), a gap of 3.3 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.3 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is T4o at 43.4%, and directly below is 86o at 43.2%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 93s is a favourite against 45 of them and an underdog against 123. Its best matchup is 83o at 73.1% and its worst is 99 at 12.2% — a spread of 60.9 points, which is why calling 93s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 94o at 49.9%.

93s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 83o at 73.1%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A9s, which leaves 93s with only 27.0%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 61 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 24 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 7.3 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 93s lands -7.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 125 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 43.2% against one opponent, 27.8% against two, 16.6% against four and 10.0% against eight. That last figure is 90% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 1.5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 93s reads as 43.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.