K6s
A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 56.8% · #49
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 20.1% · #48
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 14.0% · #47
- Chen score
- 5
- Combos
- 4 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.3%
- Favourite against
- 119 of 168 hands
K6s (king-six suited) wins 56.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 49th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 29% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 20.1% and its rank moves to 48; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 14.0% for rank 47. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
Its suited/offsuit twin K6o runs at 54.2% (rank 62), a gap of 2.6 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.6 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 44 at 57.0%, and directly below is A4o at 56.8%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K6s is a favourite against 119 of them and an underdog against 49. Its best matchup is 62o at 75.9% and its worst is KK at 11.9% — a spread of 64 points, which is why calling K6s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.8%.
K6s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 62o at 75.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K6s with only 27.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 suited hands it comes 23 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 10.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 20.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K6s lands +5.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 48 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 56.8% against one opponent, 38.1% against two, 23.4% against four and 14.0% against eight. That last figure is 126% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K6s reads as 56.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 56.8% against one opponent down to 14.0% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | K6s equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 16.5% | -33.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 11.9% | -38.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 31.8% | -18.2 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 31.6% | -18.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 31.7% | -18.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 32.4% | -17.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 32.6% | -17.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 27.8% | -22.2 | DOMINATED |
| 77 | 9 | 33.0% | -17.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 37.0% | -13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 36.8% | -13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 28.5% | -21.5 | DOMINATED |
| ATs | 13 | 36.7% | -13.3 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 39.5% | -10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 39.1% | -10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 29.5% | -20.5 | DOMINATED |
| 66 | 17 | 34.6% | -15.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 37.8% | -12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 39.2% | -10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 29.9% | -20.1 | DOMINATED |
| A8s | 21 | 37.6% | -12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 31.1% | -18.9 | DOMINATED |
| KQo | 23 | 30.8% | -19.2 | DOMINATED |
| A7s | 24 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 40.7% | -9.3 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 31.4% | -18.6 | DOMINATED |
| 55 | 27 | 47.0% | -3.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 55.5% | +5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 27.9% | -22.1 | DOMINATED |
| K9s | 30 | 33.3% | -16.7 | DOMINATED |
| A8o | 31 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 32.4% | -17.6 | DOMINATED |
| QTs | 34 | 55.3% | +5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 40.6% | -9.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 40.1% | -9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 35.6% | -14.4 | DOMINATED |
| A3s | 38 | 41.0% | -9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 58.3% | +8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 34.7% | -15.3 | DOMINATED |
| Q9s | 41 | 57.0% | +7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 42.9% | -7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 41.4% | -8.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 38.4% | -11.6 | DOMINATED |
| A6o | 45 | 28.9% | -21.1 | DOMINATED |
| JTs | 46 | 53.9% | +3.9 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 58.1% | +8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 47.9% | -2.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A4o | 50 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 58.4% | +8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 37.5% | -12.5 | DOMINATED |
| A3o | 53 | 43.9% | -6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 58.0% | +8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 55.5% | +5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 59.7% | +9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 56.3% | +6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 40.3% | -9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 58.3% | +8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 59.5% | +9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K6o | 62 | 52.4% | +2.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 58.5% | +8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 57.0% | +7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 55.0% | +5.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 61.2% | +11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 49.1% | -0.9 | COINFLIP |
| Q6s | 68 | 71.8% | +21.8 | DOMINATING |
| K2s | 69 | 58.5% | +8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 58.3% | +8.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 61.5% | +11.5 | DOMINATING |
| Q5s | 72 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 58.1% | +8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 56.2% | +6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 61.5% | +11.5 | DOMINATING |
| Q7o | 76 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4s | 77 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 59.5% | +9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 57.5% | +7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 61.7% | +11.7 | DOMINATING |
| Q3s | 81 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 75.8% | +25.8 | DOMINATING |
| 98s | 83 | 55.7% | +5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 57.6% | +7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 71.4% | +21.4 | DOMINATING |
| K2o | 86 | 61.8% | +11.8 | DOMINATING |
| Q5o | 87 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 49.8% | -0.2 | COINFLIP |
| Q2s | 89 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 58.9% | +8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 61.0% | +11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 56.7% | +6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 70.3% | +20.3 | DOMINATING |
| J3s | 97 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 58.4% | +8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 60.0% | +10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 65.6% | +15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 56.0% | +6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 75.8% | +25.8 | DOMINATING |
| J2s | 103 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 68.7% | +18.7 | DOMINATING |
| Q2o | 105 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 65.2% | +15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 62.4% | +12.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 59.5% | +9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 68.0% | +18.0 | DOMINATING |
| J4o | 111 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 74.1% | +24.1 | DOMINATING |
| T3s | 113 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 66.5% | +16.5 | DOMINATING |
| J3o | 116 | 65.2% | +15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 60.8% | +10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 72.9% | +22.9 | DOMINATING |
| T5o | 121 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 65.7% | +15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 59.7% | +9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 65.0% | +15.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 62.5% | +12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 71.8% | +21.8 | DOMINATING |
| 65s | 128 | 67.3% | +17.3 | DOMINATING |
| 95o | 129 | 64.6% | +14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 61.9% | +11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 70.2% | +20.2 | DOMINATING |
| 74s | 134 | 60.7% | +10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 65.8% | +15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 68.7% | +18.7 | DOMINATING |
| 85o | 137 | 63.6% | +13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 63.2% | +13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 65.7% | +15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 62.8% | +12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 62.1% | +12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 71.0% | +21.0 | DOMINATING |
| 93o | 145 | 65.4% | +15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 62.9% | +12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 63s | 147 | 70.1% | +20.1 | DOMINATING |
| 84o | 148 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 65.4% | +15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 63.0% | +13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 63.8% | +13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 63.2% | +13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 72.7% | +22.7 | DOMINATING |
| 62s | 156 | 71.6% | +21.6 | DOMINATING |
| 83o | 157 | 66.0% | +16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 66.0% | +16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 64.8% | +14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 65.8% | +15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 63o | 162 | 74.4% | +24.4 | DOMINATING |
| 32s | 163 | 64.4% | +14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 66.1% | +16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 67.2% | +17.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 75.9% | +25.9 | DOMINATING |
| 42o | 168 | 67.2% | +17.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 67.5% | +17.5 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of K6s?
56.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 49 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 20.1%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 14.0%.
How much better is K6s than K6o?
K6s is worth 56.8% and K6o 54.2%, a difference of 2.6 points — rank 49 versus rank 62.
How many of the 168 other hands does K6s beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 119 hands and an underdog against 49. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
447 words / 41 distinct figures — Method
