169hands
MENU
suited

K6s

56.8%
Equity vs one random hand — #49 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
56.8% · #49
6-handed (5 opponents)
20.1% · #48
9-handed (8 opponents)
14.0% · #47
Chen score
5
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
119 of 168 hands

K6s (king-six suited) wins 56.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 49th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 29% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 20.1% and its rank moves to 48; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 14.0% for rank 47. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin K6o runs at 54.2% (rank 62), a gap of 2.6 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.6 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 44 at 57.0%, and directly below is A4o at 56.8%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K6s is a favourite against 119 of them and an underdog against 49. Its best matchup is 62o at 75.9% and its worst is KK at 11.9% — a spread of 64 points, which is why calling K6s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.8%.

K6s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 62o at 75.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K6s with only 27.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 23 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 10.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 20.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K6s lands +5.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 48 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 56.8% against one opponent, 38.1% against two, 23.4% against four and 14.0% against eight. That last figure is 126% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K6s reads as 56.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 56.8% against one opponent down to 14.0% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%56.8138.1228.9323.4420.1517.5615.8714.08opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
K6s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankK6s equityvs 50%Shape
AA116.5%-33.5PAIR VS CARDS
KK211.9%-38.1PAIR VS CARDS
QQ331.8%-18.2PAIR VS CARDS
JJ431.6%-18.4PAIR VS CARDS
TT531.7%-18.3PAIR VS CARDS
99632.4%-17.6PAIR VS CARDS
88732.6%-17.4PAIR VS CARDS
AKs827.8%-22.2DOMINATED
77933.0%-17.0PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1037.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
AJs1136.8%-13.2HIGH CARD
AKo1228.5%-21.5DOMINATED
ATs1336.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
AQo1439.5%-10.5HIGH CARD
AJo1539.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
KQs1629.5%-20.5DOMINATED
661734.6%-15.4PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
ATo1939.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
KJs2029.9%-20.1DOMINATED
A8s2137.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
KTs2231.1%-18.9DOMINATED
KQo2330.8%-19.2DOMINATED
A7s2437.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
A9o2540.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
KJo2631.4%-18.6DOMINATED
552747.0%-3.0PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2855.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
A6s2927.9%-22.1DOMINATED
K9s3033.3%-16.7DOMINATED
A8o3140.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
A5s3240.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
KTo3332.4%-17.6DOMINATED
QTs3455.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
A4s3540.6%-9.4HIGH CARD
A7o3640.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
K8s3735.6%-14.4DOMINATED
A3s3841.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
QJo3958.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
K9o4034.7%-15.3DOMINATED
Q9s4157.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
A5o4242.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
A2s4341.4%-8.6HIGH CARD
K7s4438.4%-11.6DOMINATED
A6o4528.9%-21.1DOMINATED
JTs4653.9%+3.9HIGH CARD
QTo4758.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
444847.9%-2.1PAIR VS CARDS
A4o5043.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
Q8s5158.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
K8o5237.5%-12.5DOMINATED
A3o5343.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
K5s5458.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
J9s5555.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
Q9o5659.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
JTo5756.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
K7o5840.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
K4s5958.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
A2o6044.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
Q7s6159.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
K6o6252.4%+2.4HIGH CARD
K3s6358.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
J8s6457.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
T9s6555.0%+5.0HIGH CARD
Q8o6661.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
336749.1%-0.9COINFLIP
Q6s6871.8%+21.8DOMINATING
K2s6958.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
J9o7058.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
K5o7161.5%+11.5DOMINATING
Q5s7262.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
J7s7358.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
T8s7456.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
K4o7561.5%+11.5DOMINATING
Q7o7662.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
Q4s7762.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
J8o7859.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
T9o7957.5%+7.5HIGH CARD
K3o8061.7%+11.7DOMINATING
Q3s8162.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
Q6o8275.8%+25.8DOMINATING
98s8355.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
T7s8457.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
J6s8571.4%+21.4DOMINATING
K2o8661.8%+11.8DOMINATING
Q5o8765.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
228849.8%-0.2COINFLIP
Q2s8963.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
J5s9062.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
T8o9158.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
J7o9261.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
J4s9362.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
97s9456.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
Q4o9565.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
T6s9670.3%+20.3DOMINATING
J3s9762.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
98o9858.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
T7o9960.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
Q3o10065.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
87s10156.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
J6o10275.8%+25.8DOMINATING
J2s10362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
96s10468.7%+18.7DOMINATING
Q2o10566.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
J5o10665.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
T5s10762.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
T4s10862.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
97o10959.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
86s11068.0%+18.0DOMINATING
J4o11165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
T6o11274.1%+24.1DOMINATING
T3s11362.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
95s11461.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
76s11566.5%+16.5DOMINATING
J3o11665.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
87o11759.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
T2s11862.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
85s11960.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
96o12072.9%+22.9DOMINATING
T5o12165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
J2o12265.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
94s12362.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
75s12459.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
T4o12565.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
93s12662.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
86o12771.8%+21.8DOMINATING
65s12867.3%+17.3DOMINATING
95o12964.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
84s13061.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
T3o13165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
92s13262.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
76o13370.2%+20.2DOMINATING
74s13460.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
T2o13565.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
64s13668.7%+18.7DOMINATING
85o13763.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
54s13861.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
83s13963.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
94o14065.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
75o14162.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
82s14262.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
73s14362.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
65o14471.0%+21.0DOMINATING
93o14565.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
53s14662.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
63s14770.1%+20.1DOMINATING
84o14864.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
92o14965.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
43s15063.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
74o15163.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
54o15264.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
72s15363.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
52s15464.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
64o15572.7%+22.7DOMINATING
62s15671.6%+21.6DOMINATING
83o15766.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
42s15864.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
82o15966.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
73o16064.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
53o16165.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
63o16274.4%+24.4DOMINATING
32s16364.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
43o16466.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
72o16566.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
52o16667.2%+17.2HIGH CARD
62o16775.9%+25.9DOMINATING
42o16867.2%+17.2HIGH CARD
32o16967.5%+17.5HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
K6o54.2%

FAQ

What is the equity of K6s?

56.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 49 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 20.1%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 14.0%.

How much better is K6s than K6o?

K6s is worth 56.8% and K6o 54.2%, a difference of 2.6 points — rank 49 versus rank 62.

How many of the 168 other hands does K6s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 119 hands and an underdog against 49. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 41 distinct figures — Method