169hands
MENU
suitedone gapper

T8s

52.3%
Equity vs one random hand — #74 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
52.3% · #74
6-handed (5 opponents)
20.4% · #46
9-handed (8 opponents)
14.7% · #37
Chen score
7
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
73 of 168 hands

T8s (ten-eight suited) wins 52.3% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 74th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 43.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 20.4% and its rank moves to 46; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 14.7% for rank 37. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin T8o runs at 49.8% (rank 91), a gap of 2.5 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.5 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J7s at 52.4%, and directly below is K4o at 52.2%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T8s is a favourite against 73 of them and an underdog against 95. Its best matchup is 82o at 75.7% and its worst is TT at 16.5% — a spread of 59.2 points, which is why calling T8s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 66 at 49.4%.

T8s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 82o at 75.7%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them KTs, which leaves T8s with only 30.0%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 36 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 14.9 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 16.4 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T8s lands +1.3 points from the middle of the pack, and 73 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 52.3% against one opponent, 36.5% against two, 23.9% against four and 14.7% against eight. That last figure is 132% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 7 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T8s reads as 52.3% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 52.3% against one opponent down to 14.7% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%52.3136.5228.8323.9420.4518.0616.1714.78opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
T8s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankT8s equityvs 50%Shape
AA121.2%-28.8PAIR VS CARDS
KK220.8%-29.2PAIR VS CARDS
QQ319.5%-30.5PAIR VS CARDS
JJ418.2%-31.8PAIR VS CARDS
TT516.5%-33.5PAIR VS CARDS
99633.2%-16.8PAIR VS CARDS
88737.9%-12.1PAIR VS CARDS
AKs837.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
77948.8%-1.2PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1036.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
AJs1136.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
AKo1239.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
ATs1331.2%-18.8DOMINATED
AQo1439.5%-10.5HIGH CARD
AJo1539.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
KQs1636.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
661749.4%-0.6COINFLIP
A9s1840.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
ATo1932.4%-17.6DOMINATED
KJs2035.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
A8s2131.8%-18.2DOMINATED
KTs2230.0%-20.0DOMINATED
KQo2338.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
A7s2443.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
A9o2543.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
KJo2638.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
552751.2%+1.2PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2834.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
A6s2943.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
K9s3039.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
A8o3133.1%-16.9DOMINATED
A5s3244.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
KTo3331.0%-19.0DOMINATED
QTs3430.5%-19.5DOMINATED
A4s3544.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
A7o3646.2%-3.8HIGH CARD
K8s3732.3%-17.7DOMINATED
A3s3844.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
QJo3937.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
K9o4042.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
Q9s4138.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
A5o4247.1%-2.9HIGH CARD
A2s4344.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
K7s4443.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
A6o4546.6%-3.4HIGH CARD
JTs4630.0%-20.0DOMINATED
QTo4731.6%-18.4DOMINATED
444851.4%+1.4PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4943.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
A4o5047.0%-3.0HIGH CARD
Q8s5131.4%-18.6DOMINATED
K8o5233.5%-16.5DOMINATED
A3o5347.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
K5s5444.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
J9s5537.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
Q9o5641.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
JTo5730.9%-19.1DOMINATED
K7o5846.0%-4.0HIGH CARD
K4s5944.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
A2o6047.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
Q7s6143.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
K6o6246.6%-3.4HIGH CARD
K3s6344.9%-5.1HIGH CARD
J8s6430.5%-19.5DOMINATED
T9s6533.0%-17.0DOMINATED
Q8o6632.4%-17.6DOMINATED
336752.2%+2.2PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6843.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
K2s6944.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
J9o7040.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
K5o7147.4%-2.6HIGH CARD
Q5s7244.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
J7s7342.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
K4o7547.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
Q7o7646.3%-3.7HIGH CARD
Q4s7744.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
J8o7831.7%-18.3DOMINATED
T9o7934.2%-15.8DOMINATED
K3o8047.8%-2.2HIGH CARD
Q3s8145.0%-5.0HIGH CARD
Q6o8246.6%-3.4HIGH CARD
98s8368.7%+18.7DOMINATING
T7s8464.9%+14.9DOMINATING
J6s8544.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
K2o8647.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
Q5o8747.4%-2.6HIGH CARD
228853.0%+3.0PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8944.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
J5s9044.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
T8o9152.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
J7o9245.5%-4.5HIGH CARD
J4s9344.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
97s9462.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
Q4o9547.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
T6s9665.0%+15.0DOMINATING
J3s9745.1%-4.9HIGH CARD
98o9872.7%+22.7DOMINATING
T7o9968.5%+18.5DOMINATING
Q3o10047.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
87s10168.0%+18.0DOMINATING
J6o10246.8%-3.2HIGH CARD
J2s10344.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
96s10463.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
Q2o10547.9%-2.1HIGH CARD
J5o10647.4%-2.6HIGH CARD
T5s10765.1%+15.1DOMINATING
T4s10865.1%+15.1DOMINATING
97o10965.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
86s11068.2%+18.2DOMINATING
J4o11147.3%-2.7HIGH CARD
T6o11268.6%+18.6DOMINATING
T3s11365.5%+15.5DOMINATING
95s11464.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
76s11563.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
J3o11647.7%-2.3HIGH CARD
87o11772.0%+22.0DOMINATING
T2s11865.9%+15.9DOMINATING
85s11969.6%+19.6DOMINATING
96o12065.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
T5o12168.8%+18.8DOMINATING
J2o12247.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
94s12365.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
75s12464.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
T4o12568.9%+18.9DOMINATING
93s12665.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
86o12772.3%+22.3DOMINATING
65s12862.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
95o12966.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
84s13069.9%+19.9DOMINATING
T3o13169.5%+19.5DOMINATING
92s13265.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
76o13366.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
74s13465.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
T2o13569.7%+19.7DOMINATING
64s13663.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
85o13773.8%+23.8DOMINATING
54s13862.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
83s13971.4%+21.4DOMINATING
94o14068.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
75o14167.1%+17.1HIGH CARD
82s14271.7%+21.7DOMINATING
73s14366.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
65o14465.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
93o14568.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
53s14663.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
63s14765.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
84o14873.9%+23.9DOMINATING
92o14968.6%+18.6HIGH CARD
43s15064.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
74o15168.4%+18.4HIGH CARD
54o15265.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
72s15368.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
52s15465.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
64o15566.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
62s15666.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
83o15775.4%+25.4DOMINATING
42s15864.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
82o15975.7%+25.7DOMINATING
73o16069.8%+19.8HIGH CARD
53o16166.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
63o16268.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
32s16365.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
43o16466.9%+16.9HIGH CARD
72o16571.0%+21.0HIGH CARD
52o16667.7%+17.7HIGH CARD
62o16769.3%+19.3HIGH CARD
42o16867.8%+17.8HIGH CARD
32o16968.2%+18.2HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
T8o49.8%

FAQ

What is the equity of T8s?

52.3% against one random opponent, which ranks it 74 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 20.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 14.7%.

How much better is T8s than T8o?

T8s is worth 52.3% and T8o 49.8%, a difference of 2.5 points — rank 74 versus rank 91.

How many of the 168 other hands does T8s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 73 hands and an underdog against 95. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 41 distinct figures — Method