169hands
MENU
suited

K8s

58.3%
Equity vs one random hand — #37 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
58.3% · #37
6-handed (5 opponents)
21.3% · #39
9-handed (8 opponents)
15.0% · #36
Chen score
5
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
123 of 168 hands

K8s (king-eight suited) wins 58.3% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 37th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 21.9% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 21.3% and its rank moves to 39; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 15.0% for rank 36. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin K8o runs at 56.0% (rank 52), a gap of 2.3 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.3 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is A7o at 58.7%, and directly below is A3s at 58.2%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K8s is a favourite against 123 of them and an underdog against 45. Its best matchup is 82o at 77.0% and its worst is KK at 11.6% — a spread of 65.4 points, which is why calling K8s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.9%.

K8s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 82o at 77.0%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K8s with only 27.7%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 17 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 8.9 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 22.4 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K8s lands +7.3 points from the middle of the pack, and 36 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 58.3% against one opponent, 40.4% against two, 25.0% against four and 15.0% against eight. That last figure is 135% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K8s reads as 58.3% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 58.3% against one opponent down to 15.0% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%58.3140.4231.1325.0421.3518.6616.5715.08opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
K8s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankK8s equityvs 50%Shape
AA116.1%-33.9PAIR VS CARDS
KK211.6%-38.4PAIR VS CARDS
QQ331.5%-18.5PAIR VS CARDS
JJ431.2%-18.8PAIR VS CARDS
TT531.0%-19.0PAIR VS CARDS
99631.6%-18.4PAIR VS CARDS
88734.0%-16.0PAIR VS CARDS
AKs827.7%-22.3DOMINATED
77946.2%-3.8PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1036.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
AJs1136.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
AKo1228.5%-21.5DOMINATED
ATs1335.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
AQo1439.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
AJo1538.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
KQs1628.8%-21.2DOMINATED
661746.8%-3.2PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
ATo1938.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
KJs2030.0%-20.0DOMINATED
A8s2127.7%-22.3DOMINATED
KTs2230.6%-19.4DOMINATED
KQo2330.1%-19.9DOMINATED
A7s2440.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
A9o2539.5%-10.5HIGH CARD
KJo2631.3%-18.7DOMINATED
552747.6%-2.4PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2856.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
A6s2940.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
K9s3032.6%-17.4DOMINATED
A8o3128.5%-21.5DOMINATED
A5s3240.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
KTo3332.1%-17.9DOMINATED
QTs3455.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
A4s3540.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
A7o3643.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
A3s3841.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
QJo3958.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
K9o4034.1%-15.9DOMINATED
Q9s4157.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
A5o4243.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
A2s4341.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
K7s4464.6%+14.6DOMINATING
A6o4543.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
JTs4654.7%+4.7HIGH CARD
QTo4758.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
444848.5%-1.5PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4964.4%+14.4DOMINATING
A4o5043.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
Q8s5170.4%+20.4DOMINATING
K8o5252.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
A3o5343.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
K5s5463.9%+13.9DOMINATING
J9s5556.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
Q9o5660.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
JTo5757.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
K7o5867.9%+17.9DOMINATING
K4s5964.1%+14.1DOMINATING
A2o6043.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
Q7s6162.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
K6o6267.9%+17.9DOMINATING
K3s6364.7%+14.7DOMINATING
J8s6469.2%+19.2DOMINATING
T9s6555.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
Q8o6674.7%+24.7DOMINATING
336749.2%-0.8COINFLIP
Q6s6862.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
K2s6964.7%+14.7DOMINATING
J9o7059.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
K5o7167.5%+17.5DOMINATING
Q5s7262.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
J7s7361.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
T8s7467.7%+17.7DOMINATING
K4o7567.7%+17.7DOMINATING
Q7o7665.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
Q4s7762.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
J8o7873.1%+23.1DOMINATING
T9o7958.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
K3o8068.2%+18.2DOMINATING
Q3s8162.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
Q6o8265.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
98s8367.1%+17.1DOMINATING
T7s8460.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
J6s8562.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
K2o8668.3%+18.3DOMINATING
Q5o8765.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
228849.9%-0.1COINFLIP
Q2s8962.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
J5s9062.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
T8o9171.9%+21.9DOMINATING
J7o9264.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
J4s9362.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
97s9459.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
Q4o9565.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
T6s9661.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
J3s9762.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
98o9870.5%+20.5DOMINATING
T7o9963.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
Q3o10065.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
87s10167.2%+17.2DOMINATING
J6o10265.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
J2s10362.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
96s10460.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
Q2o10565.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
J5o10664.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
T5s10762.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
T4s10862.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
97o10962.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
86s11068.6%+18.6DOMINATING
J4o11165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
T6o11264.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
T3s11362.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
95s11461.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
76s11561.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
J3o11665.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
87o11771.0%+21.0DOMINATING
T2s11862.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
85s11969.4%+19.4DOMINATING
96o12063.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
T5o12165.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
J2o12265.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
94s12362.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
75s12462.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
T4o12564.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
93s12662.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
86o12772.3%+22.3DOMINATING
65s12861.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
95o12964.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
84s13071.2%+21.2DOMINATING
T3o13165.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
92s13262.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
76o13363.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
74s13463.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
T2o13565.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
64s13662.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
85o13773.5%+23.5DOMINATING
54s13861.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
83s13972.4%+22.4DOMINATING
94o14065.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
75o14165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
82s14272.5%+22.5DOMINATING
73s14365.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
65o14464.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
93o14565.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
53s14662.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
63s14763.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
84o14875.0%+25.0DOMINATING
92o14965.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
43s15063.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
74o15166.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
54o15264.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
72s15366.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
52s15463.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
64o15565.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
62s15665.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
83o15776.6%+26.6DOMINATING
42s15863.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
82o15977.0%+27.0DOMINATING
73o16068.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
53o16165.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
63o16266.9%+16.9HIGH CARD
32s16364.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
43o16466.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
72o16569.3%+19.3HIGH CARD
52o16666.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
62o16768.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
42o16867.0%+17.0HIGH CARD
32o16967.5%+17.5HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
K8o56.0%

FAQ

What is the equity of K8s?

58.3% against one random opponent, which ranks it 37 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 21.3%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 15.0%.

How much better is K8s than K8o?

K8s is worth 58.3% and K8o 56.0%, a difference of 2.3 points — rank 37 versus rank 52.

How many of the 168 other hands does K8s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 123 hands and an underdog against 45. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 44 distinct figures — Method