169hands
MENU
offsuitbroadway

KTo

59.8%
Equity vs one random hand — #33 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
59.8% · #33
6-handed (5 opponents)
22.5% · #30
9-handed (8 opponents)
14.3% · #45
Chen score
6
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
126 of 168 hands

KTo (king-ten offsuit) wins 59.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 33th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 19.5% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 22.5% and its rank moves to 30; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 14.3% for rank 45. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin KTs runs at 61.8% (rank 22), a gap of 2 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is A5s at 59.8%, and directly below is QTs at 59.5%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, KTo is a favourite against 126 of them and an underdog against 42. Its best matchup is T2o at 76.6% and its worst is KK at 9.6% — a spread of 67 points, which is why calling KTo simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.4%.

KTo dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against T2o at 76.6%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them ATs, which leaves KTo with only 24.9%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 9 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 5.6 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 27.5 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, KTo lands +8.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 32 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 59.8% against one opponent, 41.9% against two, 26.4% against four and 14.3% against eight. That last figure is 129% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 6 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why KTo reads as 59.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 59.8% against one opponent down to 14.3% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%59.8141.9232.9326.4422.5519.1616.9714.38opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
KTo played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankKTo equityvs 50%Shape
AA113.8%-36.2PAIR VS CARDS
KK29.6%-40.4PAIR VS CARDS
QQ329.0%-21.0PAIR VS CARDS
JJ428.6%-21.4PAIR VS CARDS
TT531.9%-18.1PAIR VS CARDS
99644.3%-5.7PAIR VS CARDS
88746.0%-4.0PAIR VS CARDS
AKs825.0%-25.0DOMINATED
77946.0%-4.0PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1035.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
AJs1135.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
AKo1225.9%-24.1DOMINATED
ATs1324.9%-25.1DOMINATED
AQo1437.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
AJo1537.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
KQs1625.0%-25.0DOMINATED
661746.9%-3.1PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1839.7%-10.3HIGH CARD
ATo1925.9%-24.1DOMINATED
KJs2026.1%-23.9DOMINATED
A8s2140.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
KTs2247.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
KQo2326.4%-23.6DOMINATED
A7s2440.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
A9o2541.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
KJo2627.0%-23.0DOMINATED
552747.7%-2.3PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2856.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
A6s2940.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
K9s3068.0%+18.0DOMINATING
A8o3142.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
A5s3240.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
QTs3469.7%+19.7DOMINATING
A4s3540.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
A7o3642.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
K8s3767.9%+17.9DOMINATING
A3s3840.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
QJo3959.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
K9o4072.1%+22.1DOMINATING
Q9s4160.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
A5o4242.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
A2s4340.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
K7s4467.7%+17.7DOMINATING
A6o4542.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
JTs4668.3%+18.3DOMINATING
QTo4773.6%+23.6DOMINATING
444848.3%-1.7PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4967.6%+17.6DOMINATING
A4o5042.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
Q8s5161.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
K8o5272.2%+22.2DOMINATING
A3o5342.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
K5s5467.9%+17.9DOMINATING
J9s5559.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
Q9o5664.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
JTo5772.0%+22.0DOMINATING
K7o5871.8%+21.8DOMINATING
K4s5967.6%+17.6DOMINATING
A2o6042.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
Q7s6162.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
K6o6271.7%+21.7DOMINATING
K3s6368.3%+18.3DOMINATING
J8s6460.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
T9s6567.5%+17.5DOMINATING
Q8o6665.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
336749.0%-1.0COINFLIP
Q6s6861.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
K2s6968.7%+18.7DOMINATING
J9o7063.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
K5o7171.8%+21.8DOMINATING
Q5s7261.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
J7s7361.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
T8s7469.0%+19.0DOMINATING
K4o7572.0%+22.0DOMINATING
Q7o7666.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
Q4s7762.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
J8o7863.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
T9o7971.4%+21.4DOMINATING
K3o8072.1%+22.1DOMINATING
Q3s8162.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
Q6o8265.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
98s8360.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
T7s8468.7%+18.7DOMINATING
J6s8561.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
K2o8672.8%+22.8DOMINATING
Q5o8765.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
228849.4%-0.6COINFLIP
Q2s8962.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
J5s9061.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
T8o9173.1%+23.1DOMINATING
J7o9265.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
J4s9361.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
97s9461.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
Q4o9565.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
T6s9669.9%+19.9DOMINATING
J3s9762.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
98o9864.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
T7o9973.0%+23.0DOMINATING
Q3o10066.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
87s10159.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
J6o10265.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
J2s10362.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
96s10462.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
Q2o10566.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
J5o10665.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
T5s10771.0%+21.0DOMINATING
T4s10871.1%+21.1DOMINATING
97o10964.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
86s11060.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
J4o11165.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
T6o11274.1%+24.1DOMINATING
T3s11371.7%+21.7DOMINATING
95s11463.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
76s11559.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
J3o11666.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
87o11763.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
T2s11872.1%+22.1DOMINATING
85s11961.9%+11.9HIGH CARD
96o12065.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
T5o12175.6%+25.6DOMINATING
J2o12266.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
94s12364.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
75s12460.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
T4o12575.6%+25.6DOMINATING
93s12664.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
86o12764.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
65s12859.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
95o12967.0%+17.0HIGH CARD
84s13062.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
T3o13176.1%+26.1DOMINATING
92s13264.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
76o13363.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
74s13461.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
T2o13576.6%+26.6DOMINATING
64s13660.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
85o13765.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
54s13859.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
83s13964.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
94o14068.4%+18.4HIGH CARD
75o14164.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
82s14264.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
73s14363.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
65o14463.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
93o14568.4%+18.4HIGH CARD
53s14660.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
63s14762.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
84o14866.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
92o14968.8%+18.8HIGH CARD
43s15060.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
74o15165.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
54o15263.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
72s15364.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
52s15462.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
64o15564.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
62s15663.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
83o15768.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
42s15862.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
82o15968.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
73o16067.0%+17.0HIGH CARD
53o16164.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
63o16265.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
32s16362.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
43o16464.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
72o16568.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
52o16666.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
62o16767.2%+17.2HIGH CARD
42o16866.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
32o16966.5%+16.5HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
KTs61.8%

FAQ

What is the equity of KTo?

59.8% against one random opponent, which ranks it 33 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 22.5%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 14.3%.

How much better is KTo than KTs?

KTo is worth 59.8% and KTs 61.8%, a difference of 2 points — rank 33 versus rank 22.

How many of the 168 other hands does KTo beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 126 hands and an underdog against 42. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 39 distinct figures — Method