T5o
Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 44.4% · #121
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 11.8% · #147
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 7.3% · #150
- Chen score
- 0
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 62 of 168 hands
T5o (ten-five offsuit) wins 44.4% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 121th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 71.6% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 11.8% and its rank moves to 147; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 7.3% for rank 150. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
Its suited/offsuit twin T5s runs at 47.1% (rank 107), a gap of 2.7 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.7 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 96o at 44.6%, and directly below is J2o at 44.4%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T5o is a favourite against 62 of them and an underdog against 106. Its best matchup is 95o at 71.5% and its worst is TT at 7.3% — a spread of 64.2 points, which is why calling T5o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.
T5o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 95o at 71.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them ATs, which leaves T5o with only 23.3%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 50 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 21 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 12.1 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T5o lands -6.6 points from the middle of the pack, and 120 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 44.4% against one opponent, 27.2% against two, 15.0% against four and 7.3% against eight. That last figure is 66% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 0 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T5o reads as 44.4% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 44.4% against one opponent down to 7.3% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | T5o equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 12.8% | -37.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 12.9% | -37.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 12.7% | -37.3 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 12.3% | -37.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 7.3% | -42.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 28.1% | -21.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 28.8% | -21.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 31.2% | -18.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 29.4% | -20.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 30.9% | -19.1 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 30.7% | -19.3 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 32.7% | -17.3 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 23.3% | -26.7 | DOMINATED |
| AQo | 14 | 32.5% | -17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 32.0% | -18.0 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 30.1% | -19.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 30.0% | -20.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 24.0% | -26.0 | DOMINATED |
| KJs | 20 | 30.0% | -20.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 23.7% | -26.3 | DOMINATED |
| KQo | 23 | 31.8% | -18.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 31.3% | -18.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 32.0% | -18.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 29.2% | -20.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 34.1% | -15.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 24.4% | -25.6 | DOMINATED |
| KTo | 33 | 24.4% | -25.6 | DOMINATED |
| QTs | 34 | 23.9% | -26.1 | DOMINATED |
| A4s | 35 | 37.0% | -13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 36.1% | -13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 34.9% | -15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 37.5% | -12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 30.5% | -19.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 32.9% | -17.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 25.4% | -24.6 | DOMINATED |
| A2s | 43 | 38.0% | -12.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 24.1% | -25.9 | DOMINATED |
| QTo | 47 | 24.8% | -25.2 | DOMINATED |
| 44 | 48 | 45.2% | -4.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 39.3% | -10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 24.6% | -25.4 | DOMINATED |
| J9s | 55 | 31.9% | -18.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 24.7% | -25.3 | DOMINATED |
| K7o | 58 | 36.4% | -13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 38.1% | -11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K6o | 62 | 36.4% | -13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 38.4% | -11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 32.7% | -17.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 28.5% | -21.5 | DOMINATED |
| Q8o | 66 | 35.6% | -14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 46.4% | -3.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 39.2% | -10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 33.6% | -16.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 25.7% | -24.3 | DOMINATED |
| Q5s | 72 | 24.9% | -25.1 | DOMINATED |
| J7s | 73 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 31.2% | -18.8 | DOMINATED |
| K4o | 75 | 40.4% | -9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4s | 77 | 37.9% | -12.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 29.8% | -20.2 | DOMINATED |
| K3o | 80 | 40.8% | -9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 38.5% | -11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 51.8% | +1.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 34.2% | -15.8 | DOMINATED |
| J6s | 85 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 41.0% | -9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 25.9% | -24.1 | DOMINATED |
| 22 | 88 | 47.2% | -2.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 38.6% | -11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 25.1% | -24.9 | DOMINATED |
| T8o | 91 | 32.6% | -17.4 | DOMINATED |
| J7o | 92 | 35.4% | -14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 38.1% | -11.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 53.0% | +3.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 40.1% | -9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 37.9% | -12.1 | DOMINATED |
| J3s | 97 | 38.4% | -11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 54.7% | +4.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 35.9% | -14.1 | DOMINATED |
| Q3o | 100 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 52.4% | +2.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 38.8% | -11.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 54.6% | +4.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 40.8% | -9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 26.1% | -23.9 | DOMINATED |
| T5s | 107 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 52.6% | +2.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 56.3% | +6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 53.6% | +3.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 40.1% | -9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 52.9% | +2.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 67.5% | +17.5 | DOMINATING |
| 76s | 115 | 52.8% | +2.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 40.4% | -9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 55.4% | +5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 53.1% | +3.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 65.9% | +15.9 | DOMINATING |
| 96o | 120 | 57.7% | +7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 40.8% | -9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 64.9% | +14.9 | DOMINATING |
| T4o | 125 | 55.6% | +5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 60.2% | +10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 56.8% | +6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 63.5% | +13.5 | DOMINATING |
| 95o | 129 | 71.5% | +21.5 | DOMINATING |
| 84s | 130 | 59.1% | +9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 56.0% | +6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 59.9% | +9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 56.0% | +6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 58.1% | +8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 56.0% | +6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 56.8% | +6.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 70.0% | +20.0 | DOMINATING |
| 54s | 138 | 64.1% | +14.1 | DOMINATING |
| 83s | 139 | 60.4% | +10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 64.0% | +14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 68.7% | +18.7 | DOMINATING |
| 82s | 142 | 60.2% | +10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 59.4% | +9.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 67.5% | +17.5 | DOMINATING |
| 93o | 145 | 63.7% | +13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 65.6% | +15.6 | DOMINATING |
| 63s | 147 | 58.2% | +8.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 62.9% | +12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 63.8% | +13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 60.2% | +10.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 61.8% | +11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 67.8% | +17.8 | DOMINATING |
| 72s | 153 | 60.7% | +10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 67.2% | +17.2 | DOMINATING |
| 64o | 155 | 60.7% | +10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 59.5% | +9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 64.0% | +14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 61.6% | +11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 63.9% | +13.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 69.8% | +19.8 | DOMINATING |
| 63o | 162 | 62.0% | +12.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 61.8% | +11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 64.0% | +14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 64.3% | +14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 71.5% | +21.5 | DOMINATING |
| 62o | 167 | 63.1% | +13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 65.4% | +15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 65.7% | +15.7 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of T5o?
44.4% against one random opponent, which ranks it 121 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 11.8%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 7.3%.
How much better is T5o than T5s?
T5o is worth 44.4% and T5s 47.1%, a difference of 2.7 points — rank 121 versus rank 107.
How many of the 168 other hands does T5o beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 62 hands and an underdog against 106. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
425 words / 41 distinct figures — Method
