169hands
MENU
offsuit

T5o

44.4%
Equity vs one random hand — #121 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
44.4% · #121
6-handed (5 opponents)
11.8% · #147
9-handed (8 opponents)
7.3% · #150
Chen score
0
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
62 of 168 hands

T5o (ten-five offsuit) wins 44.4% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 121th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 71.6% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 11.8% and its rank moves to 147; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 7.3% for rank 150. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin T5s runs at 47.1% (rank 107), a gap of 2.7 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.7 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 96o at 44.6%, and directly below is J2o at 44.4%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T5o is a favourite against 62 of them and an underdog against 106. Its best matchup is 95o at 71.5% and its worst is TT at 7.3% — a spread of 64.2 points, which is why calling T5o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

T5o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 95o at 71.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them ATs, which leaves T5o with only 23.3%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 50 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 21 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 12.1 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T5o lands -6.6 points from the middle of the pack, and 120 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 44.4% against one opponent, 27.2% against two, 15.0% against four and 7.3% against eight. That last figure is 66% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 0 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T5o reads as 44.4% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 44.4% against one opponent down to 7.3% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%44.4127.2219.2315.0411.859.668.377.38opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
T5o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankT5o equityvs 50%Shape
AA112.8%-37.2PAIR VS CARDS
KK212.9%-37.1PAIR VS CARDS
QQ312.7%-37.3PAIR VS CARDS
JJ412.3%-37.7PAIR VS CARDS
TT57.3%-42.7PAIR VS CARDS
99628.1%-21.9PAIR VS CARDS
88728.8%-21.2PAIR VS CARDS
AKs831.2%-18.8HIGH CARD
77929.4%-20.6PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1030.9%-19.1HIGH CARD
AJs1130.7%-19.3HIGH CARD
AKo1232.7%-17.3HIGH CARD
ATs1323.3%-26.7DOMINATED
AQo1432.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
AJo1532.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
KQs1630.1%-19.9HIGH CARD
661730.0%-20.0PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1834.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
ATo1924.0%-26.0DOMINATED
KJs2030.0%-20.0HIGH CARD
A8s2134.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
KTs2223.7%-26.3DOMINATED
KQo2331.8%-18.2HIGH CARD
A7s2434.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
A9o2536.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
KJo2631.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
552732.0%-18.0PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2829.2%-20.8HIGH CARD
A6s2934.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
K9s3034.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
A8o3136.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
A5s3224.4%-25.6DOMINATED
KTo3324.4%-25.6DOMINATED
QTs3423.9%-26.1DOMINATED
A4s3537.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
A7o3636.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
K8s3734.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
A3s3837.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
QJo3930.5%-19.5HIGH CARD
K9o4035.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
Q9s4132.9%-17.1HIGH CARD
A5o4225.4%-24.6DOMINATED
A2s4338.0%-12.0HIGH CARD
K7s4434.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
A6o4536.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
JTs4624.1%-25.9DOMINATED
QTo4724.8%-25.2DOMINATED
444845.2%-4.8PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4934.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
A4o5039.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
Q8s5133.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
K8o5236.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
A3o5339.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
K5s5424.6%-25.4DOMINATED
J9s5531.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
Q9o5634.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
JTo5724.7%-25.3DOMINATED
K7o5836.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
K4s5938.1%-11.9HIGH CARD
A2o6039.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
Q7s6134.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
K6o6236.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
K3s6338.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
J8s6432.7%-17.3HIGH CARD
T9s6528.5%-21.5DOMINATED
Q8o6635.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
336746.4%-3.6PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6834.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
K2s6939.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
J9o7033.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
K5o7125.7%-24.3DOMINATED
Q5s7224.9%-25.1DOMINATED
J7s7333.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
T8s7431.2%-18.8DOMINATED
K4o7540.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
Q7o7636.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
Q4s7737.9%-12.1HIGH CARD
J8o7834.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
T9o7929.8%-20.2DOMINATED
K3o8040.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
Q3s8138.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
Q6o8236.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
98s8351.8%+1.8HIGH CARD
T7s8434.2%-15.8DOMINATED
J6s8534.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
K2o8641.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
Q5o8725.9%-24.1DOMINATED
228847.2%-2.8PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8938.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
J5s9025.1%-24.9DOMINATED
T8o9132.6%-17.4DOMINATED
J7o9235.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
J4s9338.1%-11.9HIGH CARD
97s9453.0%+3.0HIGH CARD
Q4o9540.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
T6s9637.9%-12.1DOMINATED
J3s9738.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
98o9854.7%+4.7HIGH CARD
T7o9935.9%-14.1DOMINATED
Q3o10040.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
87s10152.4%+2.4HIGH CARD
J6o10236.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
J2s10338.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
96s10454.6%+4.6HIGH CARD
Q2o10540.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
J5o10626.1%-23.9DOMINATED
T5s10747.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
T4s10852.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
97o10956.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
86s11053.6%+3.6HIGH CARD
J4o11140.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
T6o11240.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
T3s11352.9%+2.9HIGH CARD
95s11467.5%+17.5DOMINATING
76s11552.8%+2.8HIGH CARD
J3o11640.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
87o11755.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
T2s11853.1%+3.1HIGH CARD
85s11965.9%+15.9DOMINATING
96o12057.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
J2o12240.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
94s12360.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
75s12464.9%+14.9DOMINATING
T4o12555.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
93s12660.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
86o12756.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
65s12863.5%+13.5DOMINATING
95o12971.5%+21.5DOMINATING
84s13059.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
T3o13156.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
92s13259.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
76o13356.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
74s13458.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
T2o13556.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
64s13656.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
85o13770.0%+20.0DOMINATING
54s13864.1%+14.1DOMINATING
83s13960.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
94o14064.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
75o14168.7%+18.7DOMINATING
82s14260.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
73s14359.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
65o14467.5%+17.5DOMINATING
93o14563.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
53s14665.6%+15.6DOMINATING
63s14758.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
84o14862.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
92o14963.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
43s15060.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
74o15161.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
54o15267.8%+17.8DOMINATING
72s15360.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
52s15467.2%+17.2DOMINATING
64o15560.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
62s15659.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
83o15764.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
42s15861.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
82o15963.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
73o16062.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
53o16169.8%+19.8DOMINATING
63o16262.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
32s16361.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
43o16464.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
72o16564.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
52o16671.5%+21.5DOMINATING
62o16763.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
42o16865.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
32o16965.7%+15.7HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
T5s47.1%

FAQ

What is the equity of T5o?

44.4% against one random opponent, which ranks it 121 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 11.8%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 7.3%.

How much better is T5o than T5s?

T5o is worth 44.4% and T5s 47.1%, a difference of 2.7 points — rank 121 versus rank 107.

How many of the 168 other hands does T5o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 62 hands and an underdog against 106. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

425 words / 41 distinct figures — Method