169hands
MENU
offsuit

83o

37.3%
Equity vs one random hand — #157 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
37.3% · #157
6-handed (5 opponents)
9.4% · #165
9-handed (8 opponents)
5.7% · #167
Chen score
-1
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
31 of 168 hands

83o (eight-three offsuit) wins 37.3% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 157th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 92.9% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 9.4% and its rank moves to 165; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 5.7% for rank 167. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin 83s runs at 40.7% (rank 139), a gap of 3.4 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.4 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 62s at 37.6%, and directly below is 42s at 36.9%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.7 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 83o is a favourite against 31 of them and an underdog against 137. Its best matchup is 32o at 68.6% and its worst is 88 at 6.7% — a spread of 61.9 points, which is why calling 83o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 4 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 82s at 50.0%.

83o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 32o at 68.6%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A8s, which leaves 83o with only 22.7%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 68 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 28.1 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 5 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 83o lands -13.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 156 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 37.3% against one opponent, 22.3% against two, 11.7% against four and 5.7% against eight. That last figure is 51% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at -1 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 83o reads as 37.3% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 37.3% against one opponent down to 5.7% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%20%40%37.3122.3215.6311.749.457.966.575.78opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
83o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank83o equityvs 50%Shape
AA112.3%-37.7PAIR VS CARDS
KK212.2%-37.8PAIR VS CARDS
QQ312.2%-37.8PAIR VS CARDS
JJ412.1%-37.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT511.7%-38.3PAIR VS CARDS
99611.6%-38.4PAIR VS CARDS
8876.7%-43.3PAIR VS CARDS
AKs831.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
77928.0%-22.0PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1030.9%-19.1HIGH CARD
AJs1130.8%-19.2HIGH CARD
AKo1232.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
ATs1330.4%-19.6HIGH CARD
AQo1432.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
AJo1532.2%-17.8HIGH CARD
KQs1630.4%-19.6HIGH CARD
661728.8%-21.2PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1830.7%-19.3HIGH CARD
ATo1931.8%-18.2HIGH CARD
KJs2030.6%-19.4HIGH CARD
A8s2122.7%-27.3DOMINATED
KTs2230.2%-19.8HIGH CARD
KQo2332.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
A7s2433.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
A9o2532.1%-17.9HIGH CARD
KJo2631.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
552729.2%-20.8PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2830.0%-20.0HIGH CARD
A6s2934.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
K9s3030.6%-19.4HIGH CARD
A8o3123.4%-26.6DOMINATED
A5s3233.0%-17.0HIGH CARD
KTo3331.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
QTs3429.8%-20.2HIGH CARD
A4s3533.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
A7o3635.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
K8s3723.4%-26.6DOMINATED
A3s3824.0%-26.0DOMINATED
QJo3931.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
K9o4032.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
Q9s4129.9%-20.1HIGH CARD
A5o4234.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
A2s4337.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
K7s4433.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
A6o4535.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
JTs4628.9%-21.1HIGH CARD
QTo4731.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
444830.0%-20.0PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4934.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
A4o5035.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
Q8s5123.5%-26.5DOMINATED
K8o5224.2%-25.8DOMINATED
A3o5325.1%-24.9DOMINATED
K5s5433.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
J9s5529.3%-20.7HIGH CARD
Q9o5631.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
JTo5730.3%-19.7HIGH CARD
K7o5835.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
K4s5934.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
A2o6039.5%-10.5HIGH CARD
Q7s6134.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
K6o6235.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
K3s6324.6%-25.4DOMINATED
J8s6423.8%-26.2DOMINATED
T9s6528.4%-21.6HIGH CARD
Q8o6624.5%-25.5DOMINATED
336732.6%-17.4PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6834.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
K2s6938.1%-11.9HIGH CARD
J9o7030.5%-19.5HIGH CARD
K5o7135.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
Q5s7234.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
J7s7333.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
T8s7424.6%-25.4DOMINATED
K4o7535.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
Q7o7636.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
Q4s7734.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
J8o7824.6%-25.4DOMINATED
T9o7929.8%-20.2HIGH CARD
K3o8025.6%-24.4DOMINATED
Q3s8125.1%-24.9DOMINATED
Q6o8235.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
98s8325.5%-24.5DOMINATED
T7s8432.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
J6s8534.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
K2o8640.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
Q5o8735.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
228846.2%-3.8PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8938.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
J5s9034.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
T8o9125.3%-24.7DOMINATED
J7o9234.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
J4s9334.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
97s9432.0%-18.0HIGH CARD
Q4o9536.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
T6s9633.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
J3s9725.2%-24.8DOMINATED
98o9826.2%-23.8DOMINATED
T7o9934.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
Q3o10026.2%-23.8DOMINATED
87s10133.3%-16.7DOMINATED
J6o10236.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
J2s10338.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
96s10432.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
Q2o10540.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
J5o10635.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
T5s10734.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
T4s10834.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
97o10933.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
86s11036.8%-13.2DOMINATED
J4o11136.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
T6o11235.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
T3s11326.0%-24.0DOMINATED
95s11433.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
76s11550.4%+0.4COINFLIP
J3o11626.5%-23.5DOMINATED
87o11734.8%-15.2DOMINATED
T2s11838.1%-11.9HIGH CARD
85s11940.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
96o12034.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
T5o12136.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
J2o12240.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
94s12334.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
75s12451.7%+1.7HIGH CARD
T4o12536.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
93s12626.9%-23.1DOMINATED
86o12738.8%-11.2DOMINATED
65s12850.8%+0.8COINFLIP
95o12935.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
84s13043.7%-6.3HIGH CARD
T3o13126.9%-23.1DOMINATED
92s13238.7%-11.3HIGH CARD
76o13353.0%+3.0HIGH CARD
74s13453.2%+3.2HIGH CARD
T2o13540.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
64s13652.2%+2.2HIGH CARD
85o13742.5%-7.5HIGH CARD
54s13851.0%+1.0COINFLIP
83s13947.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
94o14036.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
75o14154.8%+4.8HIGH CARD
82s14250.0%+0.0COINFLIP
73s14364.8%+14.8DOMINATING
65o14453.9%+3.9HIGH CARD
93o14528.1%-21.9DOMINATED
53s14661.8%+11.8DOMINATING
63s14763.4%+13.4DOMINATING
84o14846.0%-4.0HIGH CARD
92o14940.7%-9.3HIGH CARD
43s15062.2%+12.2DOMINATING
74o15156.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
54o15254.1%+4.1HIGH CARD
72s15358.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
52s15456.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
64o15555.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
62s15657.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
42s15856.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
82o15952.8%+2.8HIGH CARD
73o16068.4%+18.4DOMINATING
53o16165.5%+15.5DOMINATING
63o16267.1%+17.1DOMINATING
32s16364.4%+14.4DOMINATING
43o16465.9%+15.9DOMINATING
72o16562.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
52o16659.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
62o16761.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
42o16860.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
32o16968.6%+18.6DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
83s40.7%

FAQ

What is the equity of 83o?

37.3% against one random opponent, which ranks it 157 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 9.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 5.7%.

How much better is 83o than 83s?

83o is worth 37.3% and 83s 40.7%, a difference of 3.4 points — rank 157 versus rank 139.

How many of the 168 other hands does 83o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 31 hands and an underdog against 137. 4 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 44 distinct figures — Method