JJ
A middle pair — frequently chased by two overcards.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 77.5% · #4
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 33.7% · #4
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 21.7% · #5
- Chen score
- 12
- Combos
- 6 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.45%
- Favourite against
- 165 of 168 hands
JJ (pocket jacks) wins 77.5% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 4th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 2.4% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 33.7% and its rank moves to 4; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 21.7% for rank 5. A middle pair — frequently chased by two overcards.
As a pocket pair there is no suited twin; instead there are 6 combinations of it in the deck, so you are dealt it 0.45% of the time (6 of 1,326 two-card hands). The hand ranked one place above is QQ at 79.9% and one place below is TT at 75.1%. Every pocket pair flops a set about 11.8% of the time, so the pecking order among pairs is decided almost entirely before the flop.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, JJ is a favourite against 165 of them and an underdog against 3. Its best matchup is J2o at 94.0% and its worst is QQ at 18.1% — a spread of 75.9 points, which is why calling JJ simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.
JJ shares a rank with relatively few hands, so it is rarely on the wrong side of a kicker problem. What does hurt it is running into a higher pair, where the number bottoms out at 18.1%. The table further down lists all 168 opponents individually.
Within the 13 pocket pairs it comes 4 of 13. The strongest hand in that group, AA, is 7.7 points away, and the weakest, 22, sits 27.3 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, JJ lands +26.5 points from the middle of the pack, and 3 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 77.5% against one opponent, 61.4% against two, 40.2% against four and 21.7% against eight. That last figure is 195% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 12 points, and it arrives 0.45% of the time (6 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why JJ reads as 77.5% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 77.5% against one opponent down to 21.7% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
How often JJ hits the flop
Exact counts over all 19,600 flops and 2,118,760 five-card boards from the 50 cards left once your two are out — no simulation.
JJ flops a set or better (set, full house or quads) 11.8% of the time — 2,304 of 19,600 flops, or 1 in 8.5 — and exactly a set 10.8%. By the river that rises to 19.2%. Those figures are identical for every pocket pair; what differs from pair to pair is what the flop looks like when the set misses.
When the set misses, all three flop cards come in below J — leaving an overpair — 36.4% of the time, while at least one higher card lands 51.8% of the time (1 in 1.9). The chance of staying an overpair is 50.4% for QQ (one pair up), and 25.3% for TT (one pair down).
| Outcome | Probability | Count / total | Frequency | Odds against |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flop a set or better (set, full house or quads) | 11.8% | 2,304 / 19,600 | 1 in 8.5 | 7.5 to 1 |
| of which: exactly a set | 10.8% | 2,112 / 19,600 | 1 in 9.3 | 8.3 to 1 |
| of which: full house | 0.735% | 144 / 19,600 | 1 in 136 | 135 to 1 |
| of which: quads | 0.245% | 48 / 19,600 | 1 in 408 | 407 to 1 |
| No set, all three cards below J (still an overpair) | 36.4% | 7,140 / 19,600 | 1 in 2.7 | 1.7 to 1 |
| No set, at least one card above J | 51.8% | 10,156 / 19,600 | 1 in 1.9 | 0.9 to 1 |
| Set or better by the river (five-card board) | 19.2% | 406,456 / 2,118,760 | 1 in 5.2 | 4.2 to 1 |
How the flop moves JJ's equity
Equity against one random hand with the flop out and the turn and river to come. Exact counts over every deal of the opponent's two cards and the board — no simulation.
Against one random hand, JJ goes from 77.5% before the flop to 92.8% when it flops a set or better (11.8% of flops). Without a set, it holds 77.3% when all three cards are below J (still an overpair) and drops to 74.1% when a card above J lands (51.8%, 10,156 of 19,600 flops).
By board shape: rainbow 78.6%, two-tone 77.1%, monotone 72.4%. A monotone flop in one of your suits gives 79.6%. A paired board gives 80.3%, and a connected board (three ranks within five) 74.8%. The best row in the table is "Set or better (at least one J on the flop)" at 92.8%, the worst "Monotone (all three one suit)" at 72.4%.
The 77.5% at the top of the page is a 400,000-hand simulation; this table counts every deal of the opponent's two cards and the five-card board (2,097,572,400 per starting hand), which puts the pre-flop figure at 77.47% (a gap of 0.03 points). Each equity is taken with the flop out and the turn and river still to come.
| Flop | How often | Flops (of 19,600) | JJ equity | vs before the flop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before the flop (average of every flop) | 100.0% | 19,600 | 77.5% | — |
| Set or better (at least one J on the flop) | 11.8% | 2,304 | 92.8% | +15.4pt |
| No set, all three cards below J (still an overpair) | 36.4% | 7,140 | 77.3% | −0.2pt |
| No set, at least one card above J | 51.8% | 10,156 | 74.1% | −3.3pt |
| Rainbow (three different suits) | 39.8% | 7,800 | 78.6% | +1.1pt |
| Two-tone (two cards share a suit) | 55.0% | 10,788 | 77.1% | −0.3pt |
| Monotone (all three one suit) | 5.16% | 1,012 | 72.4% | −5.1pt |
| Monotone in one of your suits | 2.24% | 440 | 79.6% | +2.2pt |
| Paired board (two or more of a rank) | 17.4% | 3,408 | 80.3% | +2.8pt |
| Connected board (three ranks within five, A can play low) | 18.4% | 3,616 | 74.8% | −2.7pt |
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | JJ equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 18.8% | -31.2 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| KK | 2 | 18.4% | -31.6 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| 3 | 18.1% | -31.9 | PAIR VS PAIR | |
| TT | 5 | 81.9% | +31.9 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| 99 | 6 | 81.5% | +31.5 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| 88 | 7 | 81.4% | +31.4 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| AKs | 8 | 54.3% | +4.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 77 | 9 | 81.1% | +31.1 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| AQs | 10 | 53.8% | +3.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AJs | 11 | 65.7% | +15.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKo | 12 | 57.1% | +7.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| ATs | 13 | 67.8% | +17.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQo | 14 | 57.0% | +7.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AJo | 15 | 69.5% | +19.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KQs | 16 | 53.6% | +3.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 66 | 17 | 81.2% | +31.2 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| A9s | 18 | 68.5% | +18.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| ATo | 19 | 71.4% | +21.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KJs | 20 | 64.6% | +14.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A8s | 21 | 68.0% | +18.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KTs | 22 | 67.8% | +17.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KQo | 23 | 56.5% | +6.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A7s | 24 | 67.9% | +17.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9o | 25 | 72.1% | +22.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KJo | 26 | 68.5% | +18.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 55 | 27 | 80.5% | +30.5 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| QJs | 28 | 63.2% | +13.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A6s | 29 | 68.6% | +18.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K9s | 30 | 68.4% | +18.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A8o | 31 | 71.6% | +21.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A5s | 32 | 66.8% | +16.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KTo | 33 | 71.4% | +21.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QTs | 34 | 67.3% | +17.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A4s | 35 | 67.0% | +17.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A7o | 36 | 71.5% | +21.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K8s | 37 | 68.8% | +18.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A3s | 38 | 67.4% | +17.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJo | 39 | 67.0% | +17.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K9o | 40 | 72.0% | +22.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q9s | 41 | 67.7% | +17.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A5o | 42 | 70.0% | +20.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A2s | 43 | 67.8% | +17.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K7s | 44 | 68.5% | +18.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A6o | 45 | 72.1% | +22.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| JTs | 46 | 82.1% | +32.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QTo | 47 | 70.8% | +20.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 44 | 48 | 81.0% | +31.0 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| K6s | 49 | 68.4% | +18.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A4o | 50 | 70.5% | +20.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q8s | 51 | 68.3% | +18.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K8o | 52 | 72.5% | +22.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A3o | 53 | 70.7% | +20.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K5s | 54 | 68.1% | +18.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J9s | 55 | 83.9% | +33.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q9o | 56 | 71.3% | +21.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| JTo | 57 | 87.0% | +37.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K7o | 58 | 72.0% | +22.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K4s | 59 | 68.6% | +18.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A2o | 60 | 71.4% | +21.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q7s | 61 | 68.7% | +18.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6o | 62 | 72.1% | +22.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K3s | 63 | 68.9% | +18.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J8s | 64 | 85.4% | +35.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T9s | 65 | 81.7% | +31.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q8o | 66 | 71.9% | +21.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 33 | 67 | 81.4% | +31.4 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| Q6s | 68 | 68.7% | +18.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K2s | 69 | 69.2% | +19.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J9o | 70 | 88.9% | +38.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K5o | 71 | 71.9% | +21.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q5s | 72 | 68.4% | +18.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J7s | 73 | 86.3% | +36.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T8s | 74 | 81.8% | +31.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K4o | 75 | 72.3% | +22.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q7o | 76 | 72.1% | +22.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q4s | 77 | 68.7% | +18.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J8o | 78 | 90.3% | +40.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T9o | 79 | 85.9% | +35.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K3o | 80 | 72.8% | +22.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q3s | 81 | 69.0% | +19.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6o | 82 | 72.3% | +22.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 98s | 83 | 80.4% | +30.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T7s | 84 | 82.0% | +32.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J6s | 85 | 87.8% | +37.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K2o | 86 | 72.7% | +22.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q5o | 87 | 71.9% | +21.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 22 | 88 | 81.9% | +31.9 | PAIR VS PAIR |
| Q2s | 89 | 69.3% | +19.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J5s | 90 | 87.3% | +37.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T8o | 91 | 85.8% | +35.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J7o | 92 | 91.8% | +41.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J4s | 93 | 87.9% | +37.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 97s | 94 | 80.4% | +30.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q4o | 95 | 72.3% | +22.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T6s | 96 | 82.4% | +32.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J3s | 97 | 88.4% | +38.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 98o | 98 | 84.3% | +34.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T7o | 99 | 86.0% | +36.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q3o | 100 | 72.7% | +22.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 87s | 101 | 79.0% | +29.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J6o | 102 | 93.1% | +43.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J2s | 103 | 88.7% | +38.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 96s | 104 | 80.9% | +30.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2o | 105 | 73.1% | +23.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J5o | 106 | 92.7% | +42.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T5s | 107 | 83.5% | +33.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T4s | 108 | 83.6% | +33.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 97o | 109 | 84.4% | +34.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 86s | 110 | 79.4% | +29.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J4o | 111 | 93.2% | +43.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T6o | 112 | 86.4% | +36.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T3s | 113 | 83.9% | +33.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 95s | 114 | 82.2% | +32.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 76s | 115 | 78.2% | +28.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J3o | 116 | 93.6% | +43.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 87o | 117 | 82.9% | +32.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T2s | 118 | 84.4% | +34.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 85s | 119 | 80.4% | +30.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 96o | 120 | 84.8% | +34.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T5o | 121 | 87.7% | +37.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| J2o | 122 | 94.0% | +44.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 94s | 123 | 83.6% | +33.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 75s | 124 | 78.9% | +28.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T4o | 125 | 87.8% | +37.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 93s | 126 | 83.6% | +33.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 86o | 127 | 83.4% | +33.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 65s | 128 | 77.9% | +27.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 95o | 129 | 86.2% | +36.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 84s | 130 | 82.2% | +32.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T3o | 131 | 88.2% | +38.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 92s | 132 | 84.1% | +34.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 76o | 133 | 82.1% | +32.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 74s | 134 | 80.6% | +30.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| T2o | 135 | 88.5% | +38.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 64s | 136 | 79.5% | +29.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 85o | 137 | 84.5% | +34.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 54s | 138 | 77.7% | +27.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 83s | 139 | 83.8% | +33.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 94o | 140 | 87.8% | +37.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 75o | 141 | 83.0% | +33.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 82s | 142 | 83.9% | +33.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 73s | 143 | 82.4% | +32.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 65o | 144 | 81.8% | +31.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 93o | 145 | 87.9% | +37.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 53s | 146 | 79.2% | +29.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 63s | 147 | 81.2% | +31.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 84o | 148 | 86.2% | +36.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 92o | 149 | 88.4% | +38.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 43s | 150 | 79.5% | +29.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 74o | 151 | 84.6% | +34.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 54o | 152 | 81.2% | +31.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 72s | 153 | 83.9% | +33.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 52s | 154 | 80.8% | +30.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 64o | 155 | 83.5% | +33.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 62s | 156 | 82.9% | +32.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 83o | 157 | 87.9% | +37.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 42s | 158 | 81.3% | +31.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 82o | 159 | 88.0% | +38.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 73o | 160 | 86.4% | +36.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 53o | 161 | 83.1% | +33.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 63o | 162 | 85.2% | +35.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 32s | 163 | 81.5% | +31.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 43o | 164 | 83.5% | +33.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 72o | 165 | 88.2% | +38.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 52o | 166 | 84.8% | +34.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 62o | 167 | 87.1% | +37.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 42o | 168 | 85.4% | +35.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 32o | 169 | 85.7% | +35.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of JJ?
77.5% against one random opponent, which ranks it 4 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 33.7%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 21.7%.
Which hand is the worst matchup for JJ?
QQ, which leaves JJ with 18.1%. Its best matchup is J2o at 94.0%.
How many of the 168 other hands does JJ beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 165 hands and an underdog against 3. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
How often does JJ flop a set?
A set or better (set, full house or quads) comes 11.8% of the time — 1 in 8.5, 7.5 to 1 against — and exactly a set 10.8%. By the river it is 19.2%. Exact counts over all 19,600 flops.
What is JJ worth when it misses its set on the flop?
Against one random hand, 75.4% on a flop without a set (77.5% before the flop, 92.8% with a set or better). Exact counts over every deal of the opponent's cards and the board.
432 words / 32 distinct figures — Method
