169hands
MENU
offsuitconnector

T9o

51.4%
Equity vs one random hand — #79 of 169

A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
51.4% · #79
6-handed (5 opponents)
19.1% · #53
9-handed (8 opponents)
12.5% · #68
Chen score
6
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
73 of 168 hands

T9o (ten-nine offsuit) wins 51.4% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 79th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 46.7% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 19.1% and its rank moves to 53; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 12.5% for rank 68. A connector — straight potential, but nothing else to lean on.

Its suited/offsuit twin T9s runs at 54.0% (rank 65), a gap of 2.6 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.6 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J8o at 51.6%, and directly below is K3o at 51.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T9o is a favourite against 73 of them and an underdog against 95. Its best matchup is 92o at 75.6% and its worst is TT at 12.9% — a spread of 62.7 points, which is why calling T9o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 55 at 50.0%.

T9o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 92o at 75.6%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them JTs, which leaves T9o with only 25.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 30 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 14 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 19.1 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T9o lands +0.4 points from the middle of the pack, and 78 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 51.4% against one opponent, 36.1% against two, 22.6% against four and 12.5% against eight. That last figure is 113% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 6 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T9o reads as 51.4% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 51.4% against one opponent down to 12.5% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%51.4136.1227.9322.6419.1516.2614.2712.58opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
T9o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankT9o equityvs 50%Shape
AA118.5%-31.5PAIR VS CARDS
KK217.3%-32.7PAIR VS CARDS
QQ315.6%-34.4PAIR VS CARDS
JJ414.1%-35.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT512.9%-37.1PAIR VS CARDS
99635.2%-14.8PAIR VS CARDS
88746.7%-3.3PAIR VS CARDS
AKs835.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
77947.4%-2.6PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1034.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
AJs1134.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
AKo1236.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
ATs1326.9%-23.1DOMINATED
AQo1436.8%-13.2HIGH CARD
AJo1536.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
KQs1633.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
661748.6%-1.4PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1829.2%-20.8DOMINATED
ATo1927.8%-22.2DOMINATED
KJs2033.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
A8s2141.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
KTs2227.5%-22.5DOMINATED
KQo2335.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
A7s2441.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
A9o2530.8%-19.2DOMINATED
KJo2635.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
552750.0%+0.0COINFLIP
QJs2832.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
A6s2942.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
K9s3028.2%-21.8DOMINATED
A8o3143.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
A5s3242.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
KTo3328.6%-21.4DOMINATED
QTs3426.9%-23.1DOMINATED
A4s3542.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
A7o3644.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
K8s3741.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
A3s3842.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
QJo3934.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
K9o4029.6%-20.4DOMINATED
Q9s4127.3%-22.7DOMINATED
A5o4245.0%-5.0HIGH CARD
A2s4342.8%-7.2HIGH CARD
K7s4441.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
A6o4544.9%-5.1HIGH CARD
JTs4625.8%-24.2DOMINATED
QTo4727.8%-22.2DOMINATED
444850.4%+0.4COINFLIP
K6s4942.5%-7.5HIGH CARD
A4o5045.2%-4.8HIGH CARD
Q8s5140.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
K8o5244.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
A3o5345.0%-5.0HIGH CARD
K5s5443.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
J9s5526.4%-23.6DOMINATED
Q9o5628.5%-21.5DOMINATED
JTo5726.6%-23.4DOMINATED
K7o5844.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
K4s5943.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
A2o6045.4%-4.6HIGH CARD
Q7s6142.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
K6o6244.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
K3s6343.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
J8s6440.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
T9s6547.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
Q8o6642.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
336750.8%+0.8COINFLIP
Q6s6842.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
K2s6943.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
J9o7027.4%-22.6DOMINATED
K5o7145.7%-4.3HIGH CARD
Q5s7243.1%-6.9HIGH CARD
J7s7341.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
T8s7465.8%+15.8DOMINATING
K4o7545.7%-4.3HIGH CARD
Q7o7644.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
Q4s7743.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
J8o7842.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
K3o8045.5%-4.5HIGH CARD
Q3s8143.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
Q6o8244.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
98s8368.4%+18.4DOMINATING
T7s8465.9%+15.9DOMINATING
J6s8542.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
K2o8645.7%-4.3HIGH CARD
Q5o8745.5%-4.5HIGH CARD
228851.4%+1.4PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8943.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
J5s9043.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
T8o9169.5%+19.5DOMINATING
J7o9243.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
J4s9343.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
97s9468.3%+18.3DOMINATING
Q4o9545.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
T6s9666.0%+16.0DOMINATING
J3s9743.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
98o9872.5%+22.5DOMINATING
T7o9969.9%+19.9DOMINATING
Q3o10045.7%-4.3HIGH CARD
87s10162.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
J6o10244.9%-5.1HIGH CARD
J2s10343.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
96s10468.8%+18.8DOMINATING
Q2o10545.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
J5o10645.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
T5s10766.1%+16.1DOMINATING
T4s10866.2%+16.2DOMINATING
97o10972.7%+22.7DOMINATING
86s11062.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
J4o11145.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
T6o11269.8%+19.8DOMINATING
T3s11366.3%+16.3DOMINATING
95s11470.1%+20.1DOMINATING
76s11561.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
J3o11645.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
87o11765.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
T2s11866.7%+16.7DOMINATING
85s11963.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
96o12073.0%+23.0DOMINATING
T5o12170.2%+20.2DOMINATING
J2o12245.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
94s12370.3%+20.3DOMINATING
75s12462.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
T4o12570.2%+20.2DOMINATING
93s12670.4%+20.4DOMINATING
86o12766.5%+16.5HIGH CARD
65s12861.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
95o12974.5%+24.5DOMINATING
84s13065.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
T3o13170.3%+20.3DOMINATING
92s13271.0%+21.0DOMINATING
76o13365.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
74s13463.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
T2o13570.9%+20.9DOMINATING
64s13662.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
85o13767.6%+17.6HIGH CARD
54s13861.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
83s13966.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
94o14074.9%+24.9DOMINATING
75o14166.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
82s14266.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
73s14364.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
65o14464.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
93o14574.9%+24.9DOMINATING
53s14661.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
63s14762.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
84o14868.9%+18.9HIGH CARD
92o14975.6%+25.6DOMINATING
43s15061.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
74o15167.3%+17.3HIGH CARD
54o15265.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
72s15365.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
52s15462.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
64o15565.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
62s15664.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
83o15770.2%+20.2HIGH CARD
42s15863.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
82o15970.4%+20.4HIGH CARD
73o16068.5%+18.5HIGH CARD
53o16165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
63o16266.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
32s16363.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
43o16465.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
72o16570.0%+20.0HIGH CARD
52o16666.7%+16.7HIGH CARD
62o16768.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
42o16866.9%+16.9HIGH CARD
32o16966.7%+16.7HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
T9s54.0%

FAQ

What is the equity of T9o?

51.4% against one random opponent, which ranks it 79 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 19.1%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 12.5%.

How much better is T9o than T9s?

T9o is worth 51.4% and T9s 54.0%, a difference of 2.6 points — rank 79 versus rank 65.

How many of the 168 other hands does T9o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 73 hands and an underdog against 95. 3 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

439 words / 42 distinct figures — Method