169hands
MENU
suited

K3s

54.0%
Equity vs one random hand — #63 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
54.0% · #63
6-handed (5 opponents)
18.4% · #65
9-handed (8 opponents)
13.2% · #55
Chen score
5
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
113 of 168 hands

K3s (king-three suited) wins 54.0% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 63th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 37.3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 18.4% and its rank moves to 65; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 13.2% for rank 55. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin K3o runs at 51.3% (rank 80), a gap of 2.7 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.7 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is K6o at 54.2%, and directly below is J8s at 54.0%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K3s is a favourite against 113 of them and an underdog against 55. Its best matchup is Q3o at 76.2% and its worst is KK at 11.1% — a spread of 65.1 points, which is why calling K3s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being K4o at 49.7%.

K3s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against Q3o at 76.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K3s with only 26.1%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 29 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 13.2 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 18.1 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K3s lands +3 points from the middle of the pack, and 62 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 54.0% against one opponent, 35.5% against two, 21.7% against four and 13.2% against eight. That last figure is 119% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K3s reads as 54.0% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 54.0% against one opponent down to 13.2% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%54.0135.5226.9321.7418.4516.2614.7713.28opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
K3s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankK3s equityvs 50%Shape
AA115.5%-34.5PAIR VS CARDS
KK211.1%-38.9PAIR VS CARDS
QQ331.3%-18.7PAIR VS CARDS
JJ431.1%-18.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT531.1%-18.9PAIR VS CARDS
99631.9%-18.1PAIR VS CARDS
88732.3%-17.7PAIR VS CARDS
AKs826.1%-23.9DOMINATED
77932.6%-17.4PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1035.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
AJs1136.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
AKo1227.1%-22.9DOMINATED
ATs1336.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
AQo1438.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
AJo1538.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
KQs1628.4%-21.6DOMINATED
661733.1%-16.9PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
ATo1938.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
KJs2029.4%-20.6DOMINATED
A8s2137.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
KTs2230.3%-19.7DOMINATED
KQo2329.7%-20.3DOMINATED
A7s2437.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
A9o2540.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
KJo2630.8%-19.2DOMINATED
552733.3%-16.7PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2855.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
A6s2937.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
K9s3032.8%-17.2DOMINATED
A8o3139.7%-10.3HIGH CARD
A5s3235.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
KTo3331.7%-18.3DOMINATED
QTs3455.0%+5.0HIGH CARD
A4s3535.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
A7o3639.5%-10.5HIGH CARD
K8s3735.3%-14.7DOMINATED
A3s3827.3%-22.7DOMINATED
QJo3958.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
K9o4034.2%-15.8DOMINATED
Q9s4156.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
A5o4238.4%-11.6HIGH CARD
A2s4339.5%-10.5HIGH CARD
K7s4438.5%-11.5DOMINATED
A6o4539.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
JTs4653.9%+3.9HIGH CARD
QTo4757.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
444833.9%-16.1PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4941.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
A4o5038.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
Q8s5157.3%+7.3HIGH CARD
K8o5237.0%-13.0DOMINATED
A3o5328.2%-21.8DOMINATED
K5s5444.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
J9s5555.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
Q9o5659.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
JTo5756.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
K7o5840.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
K4s5947.1%-2.9HIGH CARD
A2o6042.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
Q7s6158.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
K6o6243.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
J8s6456.3%+6.3HIGH CARD
T9s6554.1%+4.1HIGH CARD
Q8o6660.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
336736.3%-13.7PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6858.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
K2s6952.9%+2.9HIGH CARD
J9o7058.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
K5o7146.9%-3.1HIGH CARD
Q5s7259.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
J7s7357.4%+7.4HIGH CARD
T8s7455.1%+5.1HIGH CARD
K4o7549.7%-0.3COINFLIP
Q7o7661.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
Q4s7759.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
J8o7858.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
T9o7956.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
K3o8052.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
Q3s8171.9%+21.9DOMINATING
Q6o8261.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
98s8354.5%+4.5HIGH CARD
T7s8456.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
J6s8558.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
K2o8655.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
Q5o8761.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
228848.9%-1.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8963.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
J5s9058.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
T8o9157.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
J7o9260.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
J4s9359.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
97s9455.1%+5.1HIGH CARD
Q4o9562.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
T6s9657.4%+7.4HIGH CARD
J3s9771.6%+21.6DOMINATING
98o9856.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
T7o9959.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
Q3o10076.2%+26.2DOMINATING
87s10153.9%+3.9HIGH CARD
J6o10261.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
J2s10362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
96s10456.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
Q2o10566.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
J5o10661.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
T5s10758.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
T4s10858.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
97o10958.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
86s11055.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
J4o11161.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
T6o11260.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
T3s11371.1%+21.1DOMINATING
95s11457.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
76s11554.7%+4.7HIGH CARD
J3o11676.0%+26.0DOMINATING
87o11756.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
T2s11862.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
85s11956.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
96o12059.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
T5o12161.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
J2o12265.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
94s12358.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
75s12455.8%+5.8HIGH CARD
T4o12561.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
93s12671.0%+21.0DOMINATING
86o12758.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
65s12855.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
95o12960.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
84s13057.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
T3o13175.4%+25.4DOMINATING
92s13262.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
76o13357.1%+7.1HIGH CARD
74s13457.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
T2o13565.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
64s13656.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
85o13759.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
54s13855.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
83s13971.4%+21.4DOMINATING
94o14061.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
75o14158.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
82s14262.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
73s14369.9%+19.9DOMINATING
65o14457.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
93o14575.2%+25.2DOMINATING
53s14667.7%+17.7DOMINATING
63s14768.9%+18.9DOMINATING
84o14860.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
92o14965.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
43s15068.1%+18.1DOMINATING
74o15159.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
54o15258.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
72s15362.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
52s15460.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
64o15559.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
62s15661.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
83o15775.4%+25.4DOMINATING
42s15861.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
82o15965.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
73o16074.0%+24.0DOMINATING
53o16171.6%+21.6DOMINATING
63o16272.8%+22.8DOMINATING
32s16370.6%+20.6DOMINATING
43o16472.0%+22.0DOMINATING
72o16565.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
52o16663.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
62o16764.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
42o16864.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
32o16974.6%+24.6DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
K3o51.3%

FAQ

What is the equity of K3s?

54.0% against one random opponent, which ranks it 63 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 18.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 13.2%.

How much better is K3s than K3o?

K3s is worth 54.0% and K3o 51.3%, a difference of 2.7 points — rank 63 versus rank 80.

How many of the 168 other hands does K3s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 113 hands and an underdog against 55. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 37 distinct figures — Method