K3s
A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 54.0% · #63
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 18.4% · #65
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 13.2% · #55
- Chen score
- 5
- Combos
- 4 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.3%
- Favourite against
- 113 of 168 hands
K3s (king-three suited) wins 54.0% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 63th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 37.3% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 18.4% and its rank moves to 65; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 13.2% for rank 55. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
Its suited/offsuit twin K3o runs at 51.3% (rank 80), a gap of 2.7 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.7 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is K6o at 54.2%, and directly below is J8s at 54.0%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K3s is a favourite against 113 of them and an underdog against 55. Its best matchup is Q3o at 76.2% and its worst is KK at 11.1% — a spread of 65.1 points, which is why calling K3s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being K4o at 49.7%.
K3s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against Q3o at 76.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K3s with only 26.1%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 suited hands it comes 29 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 13.2 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 18.1 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K3s lands +3 points from the middle of the pack, and 62 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 54.0% against one opponent, 35.5% against two, 21.7% against four and 13.2% against eight. That last figure is 119% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K3s reads as 54.0% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 54.0% against one opponent down to 13.2% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | K3s equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 15.5% | -34.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 11.1% | -38.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 31.3% | -18.7 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 31.1% | -18.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 31.1% | -18.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 31.9% | -18.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 32.3% | -17.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 26.1% | -23.9 | DOMINATED |
| 77 | 9 | 32.6% | -17.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 27.1% | -22.9 | DOMINATED |
| ATs | 13 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 38.6% | -11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 38.5% | -11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 28.4% | -21.6 | DOMINATED |
| 66 | 17 | 33.1% | -16.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 38.4% | -11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 29.4% | -20.6 | DOMINATED |
| A8s | 21 | 37.1% | -12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 30.3% | -19.7 | DOMINATED |
| KQo | 23 | 29.7% | -20.3 | DOMINATED |
| A7s | 24 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 30.8% | -19.2 | DOMINATED |
| 55 | 27 | 33.3% | -16.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 55.4% | +5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 37.1% | -12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 32.8% | -17.2 | DOMINATED |
| A8o | 31 | 39.7% | -10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 31.7% | -18.3 | DOMINATED |
| QTs | 34 | 55.0% | +5.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 35.8% | -14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 39.5% | -10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 35.3% | -14.7 | DOMINATED |
| A3s | 38 | 27.3% | -22.7 | DOMINATED |
| QJo | 39 | 58.1% | +8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 34.2% | -15.8 | DOMINATED |
| Q9s | 41 | 56.3% | +6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 38.4% | -11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 39.5% | -10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 38.5% | -11.5 | DOMINATED |
| A6o | 45 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 53.9% | +3.9 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 57.9% | +7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 33.9% | -16.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 38.6% | -11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 57.3% | +7.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 37.0% | -13.0 | DOMINATED |
| A3o | 53 | 28.2% | -21.8 | DOMINATED |
| K5s | 54 | 44.5% | -5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 55.3% | +5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 59.2% | +9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 56.4% | +6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 40.3% | -9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 47.1% | -2.9 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 42.1% | -7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 58.7% | +8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K6o | 62 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 56.3% | +6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 54.1% | +4.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 60.0% | +10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 36.3% | -13.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 58.7% | +8.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 52.9% | +2.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 58.0% | +8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 46.9% | -3.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 57.4% | +7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 55.1% | +5.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 49.7% | -0.3 | COINFLIP |
| Q7o | 76 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4s | 77 | 59.2% | +9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 58.9% | +8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 56.7% | +6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 52.5% | +2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 71.9% | +21.9 | DOMINATING |
| Q6o | 82 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 54.5% | +4.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 56.2% | +6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 55.7% | +5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 61.7% | +11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 48.9% | -1.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 63.2% | +13.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 58.5% | +8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 57.6% | +7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 55.1% | +5.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4o | 95 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 57.4% | +7.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 71.6% | +21.6 | DOMINATING |
| 98o | 98 | 56.9% | +6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 59.0% | +9.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 76.2% | +26.2 | DOMINATING |
| 87s | 101 | 53.9% | +3.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J6o | 102 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 62.7% | +12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 56.2% | +6.2 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 66.0% | +16.0 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 61.4% | +11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 58.6% | +8.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 58.8% | +8.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 58.0% | +8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 86s | 110 | 55.4% | +5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 61.8% | +11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 60.3% | +10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 71.1% | +21.1 | DOMINATING |
| 95s | 114 | 57.6% | +7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 54.7% | +4.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 76.0% | +26.0 | DOMINATING |
| 87o | 117 | 56.7% | +6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 56.4% | +6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 59.1% | +9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 61.6% | +11.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 65.7% | +15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 58.9% | +8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 55.8% | +5.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 71.0% | +21.0 | DOMINATING |
| 86o | 127 | 58.1% | +8.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 55.4% | +5.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 60.4% | +10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 57.6% | +7.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 75.4% | +25.4 | DOMINATING |
| 92s | 132 | 62.2% | +12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 57.1% | +7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 57.0% | +7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 65.3% | +15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 56.5% | +6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 59.3% | +9.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 55.5% | +5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 71.4% | +21.4 | DOMINATING |
| 94o | 140 | 61.7% | +11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 58.4% | +8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 62.2% | +12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 69.9% | +19.9 | DOMINATING |
| 65o | 144 | 57.9% | +7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 93o | 145 | 75.2% | +25.2 | DOMINATING |
| 53s | 146 | 67.7% | +17.7 | DOMINATING |
| 63s | 147 | 68.9% | +18.9 | DOMINATING |
| 84o | 148 | 60.7% | +10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 65.4% | +15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 68.1% | +18.1 | DOMINATING |
| 74o | 151 | 59.8% | +9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 58.2% | +8.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 59.1% | +9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 61.8% | +11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 75.4% | +25.4 | DOMINATING |
| 42s | 158 | 61.1% | +11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 65.2% | +15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 74.0% | +24.0 | DOMINATING |
| 53o | 161 | 71.6% | +21.6 | DOMINATING |
| 63o | 162 | 72.8% | +22.8 | DOMINATING |
| 32s | 163 | 70.6% | +20.6 | DOMINATING |
| 43o | 164 | 72.0% | +22.0 | DOMINATING |
| 72o | 165 | 65.5% | +15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 63.6% | +13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 64.9% | +14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 64.0% | +14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 74.6% | +24.6 | DOMINATING |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of K3s?
54.0% against one random opponent, which ranks it 63 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 18.4%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 13.2%.
How much better is K3s than K3o?
K3s is worth 54.0% and K3o 51.3%, a difference of 2.7 points — rank 63 versus rank 80.
How many of the 168 other hands does K3s beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 113 hands and an underdog against 55. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
447 words / 37 distinct figures — Method
