Q7s

Q7s (queen-seven suited) wins 54.4% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 61th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 36.1% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 19.0% and its rank moves to 55; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 13.2% for rank 56. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin Q7o runs at 51.9% (rank 76), a gap of 2.5 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.5 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is A2o at 54.9%, and directly below is K6o at 54.2%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.7 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, Q7s is a favourite against 102 of them and an underdog against 66. Its best matchup is 72o at 76.7% and its worst is QQ at 11.9% — a spread of 64.8 points, which is why calling Q7s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 50.1%.

Q7s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 72o at 76.7%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AQs, which leaves Q7s with only 27.6%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 28 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 12.8 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 18.5 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, Q7s lands +3.4 points from the middle of the pack, and 60 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 54.4% against one opponent, 36.2% against two, 22.6% against four and 13.2% against eight. That last figure is 119% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 4 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why Q7s reads as 54.4% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.