93o
Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 39.9% · #145
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 10.2% · #160
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 6.1% · #164
- Chen score
- -0.5
- Combos
- 12 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.9%
- Favourite against
- 44 of 168 hands
93o (nine-three offsuit) wins 39.9% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 145th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 85.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 10.2% and its rank moves to 160; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 6.1% for rank 164. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.
Its suited/offsuit twin 93s runs at 43.2% (rank 126), a gap of 3.3 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.3 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 65o at 39.9%, and directly below is 53s at 39.6%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 93o is a favourite against 44 of them and an underdog against 124. Its best matchup is 83o at 71.9% and its worst is 99 at 6.9% — a spread of 65 points, which is why calling 93o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 87s at 50.2%.
93o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 83o at 71.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A9s, which leaves 93o with only 22.9%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 62 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 25.5 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 7.6 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 93o lands -11.1 points from the middle of the pack, and 144 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 39.9% against one opponent, 24.0% against two, 12.7% against four and 6.1% against eight. That last figure is 55% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at -0.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 93o reads as 39.9% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 39.9% against one opponent down to 6.1% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | 93o equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 12.1% | -37.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 12.6% | -37.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 12.4% | -37.6 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 12.1% | -37.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 11.8% | -38.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 6.9% | -43.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 27.6% | -22.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 30.8% | -19.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 28.6% | -21.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 31.0% | -19.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 30.8% | -19.2 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 30.5% | -19.5 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 32.5% | -17.5 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 32.2% | -17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 30.8% | -19.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 29.4% | -20.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 22.9% | -27.1 | DOMINATED |
| ATo | 19 | 31.9% | -18.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 30.4% | -19.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 33.8% | -16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 30.2% | -19.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 32.2% | -17.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A9o | 25 | 23.7% | -26.3 | DOMINATED |
| KJo | 26 | 31.9% | -18.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 30.2% | -19.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 29.6% | -20.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 23.2% | -26.8 | DOMINATED |
| A8o | 31 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 33.4% | -16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| KTo | 33 | 31.6% | -18.4 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 29.4% | -20.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 33.9% | -16.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 35.9% | -14.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K8s | 37 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 23.9% | -26.1 | DOMINATED |
| QJo | 39 | 31.1% | -18.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 24.3% | -25.7 | DOMINATED |
| Q9s | 41 | 23.5% | -26.5 | DOMINATED |
| A5o | 42 | 35.2% | -14.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A2s | 43 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A6o | 45 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 28.5% | -21.5 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 30.8% | -19.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 31.1% | -18.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| K6s | 49 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 35.5% | -14.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 33.5% | -16.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 25.1% | -24.9 | DOMINATED |
| K5s | 54 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J9s | 55 | 23.9% | -26.1 | DOMINATED |
| Q9o | 56 | 24.4% | -25.6 | DOMINATED |
| JTo | 57 | 29.8% | -20.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K4s | 59 | 34.8% | -15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K6o | 62 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 24.8% | -25.2 | DOMINATED |
| J8s | 64 | 32.4% | -17.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 24.3% | -25.7 | DOMINATED |
| Q8o | 66 | 35.1% | -14.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 32.9% | -17.1 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q6s | 68 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 38.7% | -11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 24.8% | -25.2 | DOMINATED |
| K5o | 71 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5s | 72 | 34.4% | -15.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J7s | 73 | 33.8% | -16.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T8s | 74 | 31.7% | -18.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 36.7% | -13.3 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q4s | 77 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 34.2% | -15.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 25.1% | -24.9 | DOMINATED |
| K3o | 80 | 25.8% | -24.2 | DOMINATED |
| Q3s | 81 | 25.0% | -25.0 | DOMINATED |
| Q6o | 82 | 36.2% | -13.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 30.5% | -19.5 | DOMINATED |
| T7s | 84 | 32.8% | -17.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J6s | 85 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 40.9% | -9.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 22 | 88 | 46.6% | -3.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 38.6% | -11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 34.3% | -15.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T8o | 91 | 33.2% | -16.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 35.3% | -14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J4s | 93 | 34.7% | -15.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 33.9% | -16.1 | DOMINATED |
| Q4o | 95 | 36.6% | -13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 33.7% | -16.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 25.2% | -24.8 | DOMINATED |
| 98o | 98 | 31.9% | -18.1 | DOMINATED |
| T7o | 99 | 34.5% | -15.5 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3o | 100 | 26.1% | -23.9 | DOMINATED |
| 87s | 101 | 50.2% | +0.2 | COINFLIP |
| J6o | 102 | 36.4% | -13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 38.5% | -11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 37.3% | -12.7 | DOMINATED |
| Q2o | 105 | 40.8% | -9.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 36.0% | -14.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T5s | 107 | 34.6% | -15.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T4s | 108 | 34.8% | -15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 35.5% | -14.5 | DOMINATED |
| 86s | 110 | 51.9% | +1.9 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 36.4% | -13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 35.3% | -14.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 25.9% | -24.1 | DOMINATED |
| 95s | 114 | 41.1% | -8.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 76s | 115 | 51.2% | +1.2 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 26.4% | -23.6 | DOMINATED |
| 87o | 117 | 53.4% | +3.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T2s | 118 | 38.3% | -11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 53.1% | +3.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 96o | 120 | 39.2% | -10.8 | DOMINATED |
| T5o | 121 | 36.3% | -13.7 | HIGH CARD |
| J2o | 122 | 40.5% | -9.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 44.5% | -5.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 75s | 124 | 52.6% | +2.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 47.5% | -2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 54.8% | +4.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 51.8% | +1.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 95o | 129 | 43.3% | -6.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 84s | 130 | 54.5% | +4.5 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 26.7% | -23.3 | DOMINATED |
| 92s | 132 | 50.3% | +0.3 | COINFLIP |
| 76o | 133 | 54.3% | +4.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 54.2% | +4.2 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 40.4% | -9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 53.1% | +3.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 56.4% | +6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 54s | 138 | 52.4% | +2.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 83s | 139 | 68.0% | +18.0 | DOMINATING |
| 94o | 140 | 47.0% | -3.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 55.7% | +5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 59.4% | +9.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 66.5% | +16.5 | DOMINATING |
| 65o | 144 | 55.0% | +5.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 63.5% | +13.5 | DOMINATING |
| 63s | 147 | 65.1% | +15.1 | DOMINATING |
| 84o | 148 | 58.0% | +8.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 53.0% | +3.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 63.8% | +13.8 | DOMINATING |
| 74o | 151 | 57.1% | +7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 55.6% | +5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 72s | 153 | 59.9% | +9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 57.5% | +7.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 64o | 155 | 56.5% | +6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 58.6% | +8.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 71.9% | +21.9 | DOMINATING |
| 42s | 158 | 57.9% | +7.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 63.1% | +13.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 73o | 160 | 70.3% | +20.3 | DOMINATING |
| 53o | 161 | 67.3% | +17.3 | DOMINATING |
| 63o | 162 | 68.9% | +18.9 | DOMINATING |
| 32s | 163 | 65.9% | +15.9 | DOMINATING |
| 43o | 164 | 67.8% | +17.8 | DOMINATING |
| 72o | 165 | 63.4% | +13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 52o | 166 | 60.9% | +10.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 62o | 167 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 61.5% | +11.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 70.2% | +20.2 | DOMINATING |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of 93o?
39.9% against one random opponent, which ranks it 145 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 10.2%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 6.1%.
How much better is 93o than 93s?
93o is worth 39.9% and 93s 43.2%, a difference of 3.3 points — rank 145 versus rank 126.
How many of the 168 other hands does 93o beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 44 hands and an underdog against 124. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
440 words / 45 distinct figures — Method
