169hands
MENU
offsuit

93o

39.9%
Equity vs one random hand — #145 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
39.9% · #145
6-handed (5 opponents)
10.2% · #160
9-handed (8 opponents)
6.1% · #164
Chen score
-0.5
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
44 of 168 hands

93o (nine-three offsuit) wins 39.9% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 145th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 85.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 10.2% and its rank moves to 160; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 6.1% for rank 164. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin 93s runs at 43.2% (rank 126), a gap of 3.3 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.3 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 65o at 39.9%, and directly below is 53s at 39.6%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 93o is a favourite against 44 of them and an underdog against 124. Its best matchup is 83o at 71.9% and its worst is 99 at 6.9% — a spread of 65 points, which is why calling 93o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 87s at 50.2%.

93o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 83o at 71.9%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A9s, which leaves 93o with only 22.9%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 62 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 25.5 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 7.6 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 93o lands -11.1 points from the middle of the pack, and 144 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 39.9% against one opponent, 24.0% against two, 12.7% against four and 6.1% against eight. That last figure is 55% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at -0.5 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 93o reads as 39.9% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 39.9% against one opponent down to 6.1% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%20%40%39.9124.0217.0312.7410.258.367.276.18opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
93o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank93o equityvs 50%Shape
AA112.1%-37.9PAIR VS CARDS
KK212.6%-37.4PAIR VS CARDS
QQ312.4%-37.6PAIR VS CARDS
JJ412.1%-37.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT511.8%-38.2PAIR VS CARDS
9966.9%-43.1PAIR VS CARDS
88727.6%-22.4PAIR VS CARDS
AKs830.8%-19.2HIGH CARD
77928.6%-21.4PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1031.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
AJs1130.8%-19.2HIGH CARD
AKo1232.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
ATs1330.5%-19.5HIGH CARD
AQo1432.5%-17.5HIGH CARD
AJo1532.2%-17.8HIGH CARD
KQs1630.8%-19.2HIGH CARD
661729.4%-20.6PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1822.9%-27.1DOMINATED
ATo1931.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
KJs2030.4%-19.6HIGH CARD
A8s2133.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
KTs2230.2%-19.8HIGH CARD
KQo2332.2%-17.8HIGH CARD
A7s2433.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
A9o2523.7%-26.3DOMINATED
KJo2631.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
552730.2%-19.8PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2829.6%-20.4HIGH CARD
A6s2934.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
K9s3023.2%-26.8DOMINATED
A8o3135.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
A5s3233.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
KTo3331.6%-18.4HIGH CARD
QTs3429.4%-20.6HIGH CARD
A4s3533.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
A7o3635.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
K8s3734.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
A3s3823.9%-26.1DOMINATED
QJo3931.1%-18.9HIGH CARD
K9o4024.3%-25.7DOMINATED
Q9s4123.5%-26.5DOMINATED
A5o4235.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
A2s4337.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
K7s4434.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
A6o4536.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
JTs4628.5%-21.5HIGH CARD
QTo4730.8%-19.2HIGH CARD
444831.1%-18.9PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4934.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
A4o5035.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
Q8s5133.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
K8o5236.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
A3o5325.1%-24.9DOMINATED
K5s5434.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
J9s5523.9%-26.1DOMINATED
Q9o5624.4%-25.6DOMINATED
JTo5729.8%-20.2HIGH CARD
K7o5836.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
K4s5934.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
A2o6039.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
Q7s6134.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
K6o6236.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
K3s6324.8%-25.2DOMINATED
J8s6432.4%-17.6HIGH CARD
T9s6524.3%-25.7DOMINATED
Q8o6635.1%-14.9HIGH CARD
336732.9%-17.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6834.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
K2s6938.7%-11.3HIGH CARD
J9o7024.8%-25.2DOMINATED
K5o7136.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
Q5s7234.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
J7s7333.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
T8s7431.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
K4o7536.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
Q7o7636.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
Q4s7734.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
J8o7834.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
T9o7925.1%-24.9DOMINATED
K3o8025.8%-24.2DOMINATED
Q3s8125.0%-25.0DOMINATED
Q6o8236.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
98s8330.5%-19.5DOMINATED
T7s8432.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
J6s8534.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
K2o8640.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
Q5o8736.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
228846.6%-3.4PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8938.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
J5s9034.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
T8o9133.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
J7o9235.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
J4s9334.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
97s9433.9%-16.1DOMINATED
Q4o9536.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
T6s9633.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
J3s9725.2%-24.8DOMINATED
98o9831.9%-18.1DOMINATED
T7o9934.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
Q3o10026.1%-23.9DOMINATED
87s10150.2%+0.2COINFLIP
J6o10236.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
J2s10338.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
96s10437.3%-12.7DOMINATED
Q2o10540.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
J5o10636.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
T5s10734.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
T4s10834.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
97o10935.5%-14.5DOMINATED
86s11051.9%+1.9HIGH CARD
J4o11136.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
T6o11235.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
T3s11325.9%-24.1DOMINATED
95s11441.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
76s11551.2%+1.2HIGH CARD
J3o11626.4%-23.6DOMINATED
87o11753.4%+3.4HIGH CARD
T2s11838.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
85s11953.1%+3.1HIGH CARD
96o12039.2%-10.8DOMINATED
T5o12136.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
J2o12240.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
94s12344.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
75s12452.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
T4o12536.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
93s12647.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
86o12754.8%+4.8HIGH CARD
65s12851.8%+1.8HIGH CARD
95o12943.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
84s13054.5%+4.5HIGH CARD
T3o13126.7%-23.3DOMINATED
92s13250.3%+0.3COINFLIP
76o13354.3%+4.3HIGH CARD
74s13454.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
T2o13540.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
64s13653.1%+3.1HIGH CARD
85o13756.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
54s13852.4%+2.4HIGH CARD
83s13968.0%+18.0DOMINATING
94o14047.0%-3.0HIGH CARD
75o14155.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
82s14259.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
73s14366.5%+16.5DOMINATING
65o14455.0%+5.0HIGH CARD
53s14663.5%+13.5DOMINATING
63s14765.1%+15.1DOMINATING
84o14858.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
92o14953.0%+3.0HIGH CARD
43s15063.8%+13.8DOMINATING
74o15157.1%+7.1HIGH CARD
54o15255.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
72s15359.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
52s15457.5%+7.5HIGH CARD
64o15556.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
62s15658.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
83o15771.9%+21.9DOMINATING
42s15857.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
82o15963.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
73o16070.3%+20.3DOMINATING
53o16167.3%+17.3DOMINATING
63o16268.9%+18.9DOMINATING
32s16365.9%+15.9DOMINATING
43o16467.8%+17.8DOMINATING
72o16563.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
52o16660.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
62o16762.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
42o16861.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
32o16970.2%+20.2DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
93s43.2%

FAQ

What is the equity of 93o?

39.9% against one random opponent, which ranks it 145 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 10.2%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 6.1%.

How much better is 93o than 93s?

93o is worth 39.9% and 93s 43.2%, a difference of 3.3 points — rank 145 versus rank 126.

How many of the 168 other hands does 93o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 44 hands and an underdog against 124. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 45 distinct figures — Method