169hands
MENU
suitedace high

A2s

57.6%
Equity vs one random hand — #43 of 169

A suited ace — nut-flush potential on top of top-pair equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
57.6% · #43
6-handed (5 opponents)
20.6% · #43
9-handed (8 opponents)
14.6% · #38
Chen score
7
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
133 of 168 hands

A2s (ace-deuce suited) wins 57.6% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 43th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 25.4% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 20.6% and its rank moves to 43; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 14.6% for rank 38. A suited ace — nut-flush potential on top of top-pair equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin A2o runs at 54.9% (rank 60), a gap of 2.7 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.7 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is A5o at 57.7%, and directly below is K7s at 57.6%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.1 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, A2s is a favourite against 133 of them and an underdog against 35. Its best matchup is K2o at 77.2% and its worst is AA at 12.0% — a spread of 65.2 points, which is why calling A2s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being A3o at 49.7%.

A2s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against K2o at 77.2%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves A2s with only 28.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 20 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 9.6 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 21.7 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, A2s lands +6.6 points from the middle of the pack, and 42 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 57.6% against one opponent, 38.6% against two, 24.0% against four and 14.6% against eight. That last figure is 132% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 7 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why A2s reads as 57.6% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 57.6% against one opponent down to 14.6% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%57.6138.6229.2324.0420.6517.8616.3714.68opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
A2s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankA2s equityvs 50%Shape
AA112.0%-38.0PAIR VS CARDS
KK232.1%-17.9PAIR VS CARDS
QQ332.2%-17.8PAIR VS CARDS
JJ432.2%-17.8PAIR VS CARDS
TT532.3%-17.7PAIR VS CARDS
99633.1%-16.9PAIR VS CARDS
88733.3%-16.7PAIR VS CARDS
AKs828.8%-21.2DOMINATED
77933.4%-16.6PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1029.5%-20.5DOMINATED
AJs1130.6%-19.4DOMINATED
AKo1230.3%-19.7DOMINATED
ATs1331.6%-18.4DOMINATED
AQo1430.7%-19.3DOMINATED
AJo1531.7%-18.3DOMINATED
KQs1657.2%+7.2HIGH CARD
661733.3%-16.7PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1833.9%-16.1DOMINATED
ATo1933.0%-17.0DOMINATED
KJs2056.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
A8s2136.4%-13.6DOMINATED
KTs2256.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
KQo2360.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
A7s2439.0%-11.0DOMINATED
A9o2535.5%-14.5DOMINATED
KJo2659.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
552733.2%-16.8PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2855.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
A6s2942.5%-7.5HIGH CARD
K9s3058.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
A8o3137.9%-12.1DOMINATED
A5s3244.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
KTo3359.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
QTs3455.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
A4s3547.0%-3.0HIGH CARD
A7o3641.1%-8.9HIGH CARD
K8s3758.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
A3s3847.2%-2.8HIGH CARD
QJo3958.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
K9o4060.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
Q9s4156.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
A5o4246.8%-3.2HIGH CARD
K7s4458.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
A6o4544.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
JTs4654.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
QTo4758.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
444833.9%-16.1PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4958.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
A4o5049.5%-0.5COINFLIP
Q8s5157.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
K8o5261.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
A3o5349.7%-0.3COINFLIP
K5s5459.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
J9s5555.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
Q9o5659.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
JTo5757.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
K7o5861.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
K4s5959.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
A2o6052.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
Q7s6158.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
K6o6261.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
K3s6360.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
J8s6456.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
T9s6554.6%+4.6HIGH CARD
Q8o6660.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
336734.6%-15.4PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6858.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
K2s6972.8%+22.8DOMINATING
J9o7058.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
K5o7162.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
Q5s7259.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
J7s7357.2%+7.2HIGH CARD
T8s7455.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
K4o7562.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
Q7o7661.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
Q4s7759.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
J8o7859.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
T9o7957.2%+7.2HIGH CARD
K3o8063.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
Q3s8160.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
Q6o8261.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
98s8354.8%+4.8HIGH CARD
T7s8456.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
J6s8558.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
K2o8677.2%+27.2DOMINATING
Q5o8762.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
228837.9%-12.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8972.4%+22.4DOMINATING
J5s9059.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
T8o9158.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
J7o9260.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
J4s9359.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
97s9455.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
Q4o9562.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
T6s9656.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
J3s9759.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
98o9857.4%+7.4HIGH CARD
T7o9958.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
Q3o10063.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
87s10154.6%+4.6HIGH CARD
J6o10261.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
J2s10372.2%+22.2DOMINATING
96s10456.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
Q2o10576.9%+26.9DOMINATING
J5o10662.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
T5s10759.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
T4s10859.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
97o10958.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
86s11055.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
J4o11162.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
T6o11259.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
T3s11359.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
95s11458.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
76s11553.8%+3.8HIGH CARD
J3o11662.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
87o11757.0%+7.0HIGH CARD
T2s11871.8%+21.8DOMINATING
85s11957.5%+7.5HIGH CARD
96o12059.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
T5o12162.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
J2o12276.3%+26.3DOMINATING
94s12359.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
75s12456.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
T4o12562.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
93s12659.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
86o12757.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
65s12855.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
95o12961.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
84s13058.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
T3o13162.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
92s13272.0%+22.0DOMINATING
76o13356.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
74s13457.4%+7.4HIGH CARD
T2o13576.0%+26.0DOMINATING
64s13656.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
85o13760.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
54s13855.8%+5.8HIGH CARD
83s13959.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
94o14062.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
75o14158.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
82s14271.6%+21.6DOMINATING
73s14358.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
65o14457.9%+7.9HIGH CARD
93o14562.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
53s14657.1%+7.1HIGH CARD
63s14757.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
84o14861.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
92o14976.2%+26.2DOMINATING
43s15057.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
74o15160.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
54o15258.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
72s15371.8%+21.8DOMINATING
52s15470.8%+20.8DOMINATING
64o15559.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
62s15670.5%+20.5DOMINATING
83o15762.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
42s15871.1%+21.1DOMINATING
82o15976.0%+26.0DOMINATING
73o16061.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
53o16160.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
63o16260.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
32s16371.7%+21.7DOMINATING
43o16460.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
72o16576.2%+26.2DOMINATING
52o16675.0%+25.0DOMINATING
62o16774.6%+24.6DOMINATING
42o16875.2%+25.2DOMINATING
32o16975.8%+25.8DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
A2o54.9%
Matchup pages featuring A2s

FAQ

What is the equity of A2s?

57.6% against one random opponent, which ranks it 43 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 20.6%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 14.6%.

How much better is A2s than A2o?

A2s is worth 57.6% and A2o 54.9%, a difference of 2.7 points — rank 43 versus rank 60.

How many of the 168 other hands does A2s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 133 hands and an underdog against 35. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

445 words / 41 distinct figures — Method