169hands
MENU
offsuitone gapper

J9o

53.2%
Equity vs one random hand — #70 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
53.2% · #70
6-handed (5 opponents)
18.8% · #61
9-handed (8 opponents)
12.1% · #75
Chen score
6
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
87 of 168 hands

J9o (jack-nine offsuit) wins 53.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 70th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 41.4% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 18.8% and its rank moves to 61; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 12.1% for rank 75. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin J9s runs at 55.7% (rank 55), a gap of 2.5 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.5 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is K2s at 53.2%, and directly below is K5o at 53.2%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, J9o is a favourite against 87 of them and an underdog against 81. Its best matchup is 92o at 75.8% and its worst is JJ at 11.1% — a spread of 64.7 points, which is why calling J9o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 49.8%.

J9o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 92o at 75.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AJs, which leaves J9o with only 25.6%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 25 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 12.2 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 20.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, J9o lands +2.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 69 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 53.2% against one opponent, 36.1% against two, 22.5% against four and 12.1% against eight. That last figure is 109% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 6 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why J9o reads as 53.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 53.2% against one opponent down to 12.1% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%53.2136.1228.1322.5418.8516.1614.1712.18opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
J9o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankJ9o equityvs 50%Shape
AA116.8%-33.2PAIR VS CARDS
KK215.4%-34.6PAIR VS CARDS
QQ314.1%-35.9PAIR VS CARDS
JJ411.1%-38.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT528.8%-21.2PAIR VS CARDS
99633.6%-16.4PAIR VS CARDS
88745.5%-4.5PAIR VS CARDS
AKs833.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
77946.7%-3.3PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1033.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
AJs1125.6%-24.4DOMINATED
AKo1235.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
ATs1336.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
AQo1435.3%-14.7HIGH CARD
AJo1526.5%-23.5DOMINATED
KQs1632.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
661748.2%-1.8PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1827.6%-22.4DOMINATED
ATo1938.0%-12.0HIGH CARD
KJs2026.1%-23.9DOMINATED
A8s2140.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
KTs2235.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
KQo2334.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
A7s2440.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
A9o2529.1%-20.9DOMINATED
KJo2627.1%-22.9DOMINATED
552748.3%-1.7PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2825.7%-24.3DOMINATED
A6s2941.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
K9s3027.0%-23.0DOMINATED
A8o3142.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
A5s3241.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
KTo3336.9%-13.1HIGH CARD
QTs3434.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
A4s3541.7%-8.3HIGH CARD
A7o3643.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
K8s3740.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
A3s3841.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
QJo3926.5%-23.5DOMINATED
K9o4027.9%-22.1DOMINATED
Q9s4125.7%-24.3DOMINATED
A5o4243.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
A2s4341.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
K7s4440.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
A6o4544.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
JTs4627.2%-22.8DOMINATED
QTo4735.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
444849.3%-0.7COINFLIP
K6s4941.7%-8.3HIGH CARD
A4o5044.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
Q8s5139.7%-10.3HIGH CARD
K8o5242.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
A3o5343.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
K5s5441.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
J9s5547.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
Q9o5626.9%-23.1DOMINATED
JTo5728.1%-21.9DOMINATED
K7o5843.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
K4s5941.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
A2o6043.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
Q7s6141.2%-8.8HIGH CARD
K6o6244.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
K3s6342.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
J8s6465.8%+15.8DOMINATING
T9s6568.6%+18.6DOMINATING
Q8o6642.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
336749.8%-0.2COINFLIP
Q6s6841.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
K2s6941.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
K5o7144.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
Q5s7241.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
J7s7365.9%+15.9DOMINATING
T8s7459.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
K4o7544.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
Q7o7643.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
Q4s7741.9%-8.1HIGH CARD
J8o7869.7%+19.7DOMINATING
T9o7972.6%+22.6DOMINATING
K3o8044.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
Q3s8142.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
Q6o8243.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
98s8367.5%+17.5DOMINATING
T7s8461.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
J6s8566.1%+16.1DOMINATING
K2o8644.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
Q5o8743.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
228850.2%+0.2COINFLIP
Q2s8942.1%-7.9HIGH CARD
J5s9065.6%+15.6DOMINATING
T8o9163.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
J7o9269.9%+19.9DOMINATING
J4s9366.0%+16.0DOMINATING
97s9467.9%+17.9DOMINATING
Q4o9544.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
T6s9661.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
J3s9766.3%+16.3DOMINATING
98o9871.6%+21.6DOMINATING
T7o9964.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
Q3o10044.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
87s10161.0%+11.0HIGH CARD
J6o10269.9%+19.9DOMINATING
J2s10366.6%+16.6DOMINATING
96s10469.6%+19.6DOMINATING
Q2o10544.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
J5o10669.5%+19.5DOMINATING
T5s10762.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
T4s10863.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
97o10972.0%+22.0DOMINATING
86s11062.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
J4o11170.0%+20.0DOMINATING
T6o11265.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
T3s11362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
95s11469.0%+19.0DOMINATING
76s11560.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
J3o11670.2%+20.2DOMINATING
87o11764.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
T2s11863.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
85s11962.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
96o12073.7%+23.7DOMINATING
T5o12166.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
J2o12270.7%+20.7DOMINATING
94s12370.6%+20.6DOMINATING
75s12461.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
T4o12566.7%+16.7HIGH CARD
93s12670.9%+20.9DOMINATING
86o12765.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
65s12859.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
95o12973.6%+23.6DOMINATING
84s13064.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
T3o13166.7%+16.7HIGH CARD
92s13271.2%+21.2DOMINATING
76o13364.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
74s13462.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
T2o13567.1%+17.1HIGH CARD
64s13661.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
85o13766.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
54s13860.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
83s13965.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
94o14075.1%+25.1DOMINATING
75o14164.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
82s14265.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
73s14363.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
65o14463.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
93o14575.2%+25.2DOMINATING
53s14660.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
63s14762.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
84o14868.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
92o14975.8%+25.8DOMINATING
43s15061.4%+11.4HIGH CARD
74o15166.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
54o15263.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
72s15365.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
52s15462.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
64o15565.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
62s15663.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
83o15769.5%+19.5HIGH CARD
42s15862.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
82o15969.6%+19.6HIGH CARD
73o16067.8%+17.8HIGH CARD
53o16164.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
63o16266.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
32s16362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
43o16465.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
72o16569.2%+19.2HIGH CARD
52o16666.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
62o16767.7%+17.7HIGH CARD
42o16866.5%+16.5HIGH CARD
32o16966.7%+16.7HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
J9s55.7%

FAQ

What is the equity of J9o?

53.2% against one random opponent, which ranks it 70 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 18.8%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 12.1%.

How much better is J9o than J9s?

J9o is worth 53.2% and J9s 55.7%, a difference of 2.5 points — rank 70 versus rank 55.

How many of the 168 other hands does J9o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 87 hands and an underdog against 81. 3 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 43 distinct figures — Method