T2s

T2s (ten-deuce suited) wins 44.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 118th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 69.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 14.4% and its rank moves to 117; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 10.7% for rank 102. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin T2o runs at 41.7% (rank 135), a gap of 3.1 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.1 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 87o at 45.1%, and directly below is 85s at 44.6%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T2s is a favourite against 57 of them and an underdog against 111. Its best matchup is 92o at 74.4% and its worst is TT at 11.7% — a spread of 62.7 points, which is why calling T2s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being T3o at 49.8%.

T2s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 92o at 74.4%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them ATs, which leaves T2s with only 26.1%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 57 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 22.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 8.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T2s lands -6.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 117 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 44.8% against one opponent, 28.8% against two, 17.5% against four and 10.7% against eight. That last figure is 96% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 2 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T2s reads as 44.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.