169hands
MENU
suitedone gapper

J9s

55.7%
Equity vs one random hand — #55 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
55.7% · #55
6-handed (5 opponents)
22.0% · #33
9-handed (8 opponents)
15.8% · #29
Chen score
8
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
92 of 168 hands

J9s (jack-nine suited) wins 55.7% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 55th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 32.5% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 22.0% and its rank moves to 33; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 15.8% for rank 29. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin J9o runs at 53.2% (rank 70), a gap of 2.5 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.5 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is K5s at 55.7%, and directly below is Q9o at 55.4%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, J9s is a favourite against 92 of them and an underdog against 76. Its best matchup is 92o at 76.5% and its worst is JJ at 16.1% — a spread of 60.4 points, which is why calling J9s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 66 at 50.4%.

J9s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 92o at 76.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them QJs, which leaves J9s with only 29.6%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 26 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 11.5 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 19.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, J9s lands +4.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 54 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 55.7% against one opponent, 39.3% against two, 26.0% against four and 15.8% against eight. That last figure is 142% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 8 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why J9s reads as 55.7% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 55.7% against one opponent down to 15.8% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%55.7139.3231.2326.0422.0519.7617.6715.88opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
J9s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankJ9s equityvs 50%Shape
AA120.6%-29.4PAIR VS CARDS
KK219.4%-30.6PAIR VS CARDS
QQ318.1%-31.9PAIR VS CARDS
JJ416.1%-33.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT532.4%-17.6PAIR VS CARDS
99637.5%-12.5PAIR VS CARDS
88748.0%-2.0PAIR VS CARDS
AKs836.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
77949.1%-0.9COINFLIP
AQs1036.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
AJs1129.8%-20.2DOMINATED
AKo1239.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
ATs1339.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
AQo1438.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
AJo1530.6%-19.4DOMINATED
KQs1635.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
661750.4%+0.4COINFLIP
A9s1831.8%-18.2DOMINATED
ATo1941.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
KJs2030.2%-19.8DOMINATED
A8s2143.2%-6.8HIGH CARD
KTs2237.9%-12.1HIGH CARD
KQo2338.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
A7s2443.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
A9o2533.0%-17.0DOMINATED
KJo2631.2%-18.8DOMINATED
552750.8%+0.8COINFLIP
QJs2829.6%-20.4DOMINATED
A6s2944.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
K9s3030.7%-19.3DOMINATED
A8o3145.7%-4.3HIGH CARD
A5s3243.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
KTo3340.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
QTs3436.8%-13.2HIGH CARD
A4s3544.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
A7o3646.5%-3.5HIGH CARD
K8s3743.3%-6.7HIGH CARD
A3s3844.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
QJo3930.6%-19.4DOMINATED
K9o4032.0%-18.0DOMINATED
Q9s4129.9%-20.1DOMINATED
A5o4246.6%-3.4HIGH CARD
A2s4344.1%-5.9HIGH CARD
K7s4443.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
A6o4547.2%-2.8HIGH CARD
JTs4631.1%-18.9DOMINATED
QTo4739.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
444851.6%+1.6PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4944.5%-5.5HIGH CARD
A4o5047.0%-3.0HIGH CARD
Q8s5142.7%-7.3HIGH CARD
K8o5246.0%-4.0HIGH CARD
A3o5347.1%-2.9HIGH CARD
K5s5444.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
Q9o5631.0%-19.0DOMINATED
JTo5732.2%-17.8DOMINATED
K7o5846.3%-3.7HIGH CARD
K4s5944.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
A2o6047.2%-2.8HIGH CARD
Q7s6144.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
K6o6247.4%-2.6HIGH CARD
K3s6344.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
J8s6467.1%+17.1DOMINATING
T9s6569.5%+19.5DOMINATING
Q8o6645.3%-4.7HIGH CARD
336752.1%+2.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6844.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
K2s6944.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
J9o7052.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
K5o7147.0%-3.0HIGH CARD
Q5s7244.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
J7s7367.2%+17.2DOMINATING
T8s7462.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
K4o7547.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
Q7o7646.6%-3.4HIGH CARD
Q4s7744.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
J8o7871.0%+21.0DOMINATING
T9o7973.6%+23.6DOMINATING
K3o8047.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
Q3s8144.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
Q6o8247.1%-2.9HIGH CARD
98s8368.8%+18.8DOMINATING
T7s8463.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
J6s8567.4%+17.4DOMINATING
K2o8647.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
Q5o8747.1%-2.9HIGH CARD
228852.6%+2.6PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8944.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
J5s9067.1%+17.1DOMINATING
T8o9165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
J7o9271.2%+21.2DOMINATING
J4s9367.7%+17.7DOMINATING
97s9469.2%+19.2DOMINATING
Q4o9547.4%-2.6HIGH CARD
T6s9664.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
J3s9767.7%+17.7DOMINATING
98o9872.6%+22.6DOMINATING
T7o9966.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
Q3o10047.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
87s10163.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
J6o10271.3%+21.3DOMINATING
J2s10368.1%+18.1DOMINATING
96s10470.5%+20.5DOMINATING
Q2o10547.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
J5o10671.2%+21.2DOMINATING
T5s10765.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
T4s10865.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
97o10973.0%+23.0DOMINATING
86s11064.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
J4o11171.5%+21.5DOMINATING
T6o11267.1%+17.1HIGH CARD
T3s11365.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
95s11470.2%+20.2DOMINATING
76s11563.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
J3o11671.7%+21.7DOMINATING
87o11766.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
T2s11865.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
85s11965.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
96o12074.7%+24.7DOMINATING
T5o12168.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
J2o12271.9%+21.9DOMINATING
94s12371.8%+21.8DOMINATING
75s12463.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
T4o12568.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
93s12671.8%+21.8DOMINATING
86o12767.3%+17.3HIGH CARD
65s12862.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
95o12974.3%+24.3DOMINATING
84s13066.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
T3o13168.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
92s13272.2%+22.2DOMINATING
76o13366.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
74s13464.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
T2o13568.6%+18.6HIGH CARD
64s13664.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
85o13768.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
54s13862.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
83s13967.7%+17.7HIGH CARD
94o14075.9%+25.9DOMINATING
75o14166.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
82s14267.7%+17.7HIGH CARD
73s14366.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
65o14465.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
93o14576.1%+26.1DOMINATING
53s14663.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
63s14764.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
84o14869.5%+19.5HIGH CARD
92o14976.5%+26.5DOMINATING
43s15063.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
74o15168.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
54o15265.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
72s15367.4%+17.4HIGH CARD
52s15464.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
64o15567.0%+17.0HIGH CARD
62s15666.1%+16.1HIGH CARD
83o15770.7%+20.7HIGH CARD
42s15865.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
82o15970.9%+20.9HIGH CARD
73o16069.1%+19.1HIGH CARD
53o16166.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
63o16268.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
32s16365.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
43o16466.8%+16.8HIGH CARD
72o16570.6%+20.6HIGH CARD
52o16667.6%+17.6HIGH CARD
62o16769.0%+19.0HIGH CARD
42o16868.3%+18.3HIGH CARD
32o16968.2%+18.2HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
J9o53.2%

FAQ

What is the equity of J9s?

55.7% against one random opponent, which ranks it 55 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 22.0%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 15.8%.

How much better is J9s than J9o?

J9s is worth 55.7% and J9o 53.2%, a difference of 2.5 points — rank 55 versus rank 70.

How many of the 168 other hands does J9s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 92 hands and an underdog against 76. 3 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 41 distinct figures — Method