75s
A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
- Heads-up (1 opponent)
- 43.7% · #124
- 6-handed (5 opponents)
- 16.6% · #88
- 9-handed (8 opponents)
- 12.4% · #73
- Chen score
- 5.5
- Combos
- 4 / 1,326
- Dealt frequency
- 0.3%
- Favourite against
- 29 of 168 hands
75s (seven-five suited) wins 43.7% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 124th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 73.4% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 16.6% and its rank moves to 88; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 12.4% for rank 73. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.
Its suited/offsuit twin 75o runs at 40.5% (rank 141), a gap of 3.2 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.2 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 94s at 43.8%, and directly below is T4o at 43.4%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.
Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 75s is a favourite against 29 of them and an underdog against 139. Its best matchup is 52o at 69.5% and its worst is 77 at 17.2% — a spread of 52.3 points, which is why calling 75s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 50.5%.
75s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 52o at 69.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A7s, which leaves 75s with only 30.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.
Within the 78 suited hands it comes 60 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 23.5 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 7.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 75s lands -7.3 points from the middle of the pack, and 123 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.
Adding players costs equity steadily: 43.7% against one opponent, 30.2% against two, 19.7% against four and 12.4% against eight. That last figure is 112% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5.5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).
One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 75s reads as 43.7% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.
Equity by opponent count
From 43.7% against one opponent down to 12.4% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.
Against all 168 other hands
200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.
| Opponent hand | Opp. rank | 75s equity | vs 50% | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 1 | 21.0% | -29.0 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| KK | 2 | 21.3% | -28.7 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 3 | 20.8% | -29.2 | PAIR VS CARDS | |
| JJ | 4 | 21.1% | -28.9 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| TT | 5 | 20.8% | -29.2 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 99 | 6 | 19.6% | -30.4 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| 88 | 7 | 18.4% | -31.6 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AKs | 8 | 37.8% | -12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 77 | 9 | 17.2% | -32.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| AQs | 10 | 37.5% | -12.5 | HIGH CARD |
| AJs | 11 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| AKo | 12 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| ATs | 13 | 37.1% | -12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| AQo | 14 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| AJo | 15 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KQs | 16 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 66 | 17 | 33.5% | -16.5 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| A9s | 18 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| ATo | 19 | 39.5% | -10.5 | HIGH CARD |
| KJs | 20 | 37.3% | -12.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A8s | 21 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| KTs | 22 | 37.0% | -13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| KQo | 23 | 39.7% | -10.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A7s | 24 | 30.8% | -19.2 | DOMINATED |
| A9o | 25 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| KJo | 26 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 55 | 27 | 38.7% | -11.3 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| QJs | 28 | 36.5% | -13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| A6s | 29 | 40.2% | -9.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K9s | 30 | 37.4% | -12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A8o | 31 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| A5s | 32 | 31.6% | -18.4 | DOMINATED |
| KTo | 33 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| QTs | 34 | 36.4% | -13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A4s | 35 | 42.2% | -7.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A7o | 36 | 32.1% | -17.9 | DOMINATED |
| K8s | 37 | 37.7% | -12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| A3s | 38 | 43.0% | -7.0 | HIGH CARD |
| QJo | 39 | 39.3% | -10.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K9o | 40 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9s | 41 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| A5o | 42 | 33.0% | -17.0 | DOMINATED |
| A2s | 43 | 43.9% | -6.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K7s | 44 | 32.0% | -18.0 | DOMINATED |
| A6o | 45 | 42.9% | -7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| JTs | 46 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| QTo | 47 | 38.6% | -11.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 44 | 48 | 49.4% | -0.6 | COINFLIP |
| K6s | 49 | 40.3% | -9.7 | HIGH CARD |
| A4o | 50 | 45.3% | -4.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8s | 51 | 37.2% | -12.8 | HIGH CARD |
| K8o | 52 | 40.0% | -10.0 | HIGH CARD |
| A3o | 53 | 45.6% | -4.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K5s | 54 | 32.3% | -17.7 | DOMINATED |
| J9s | 55 | 36.4% | -13.6 | HIGH CARD |
| Q9o | 56 | 39.4% | -10.6 | HIGH CARD |
| JTo | 57 | 38.3% | -11.7 | HIGH CARD |
| K7o | 58 | 33.1% | -16.9 | DOMINATED |
| K4s | 59 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| A2o | 60 | 46.6% | -3.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7s | 61 | 32.0% | -18.0 | DOMINATED |
| K6o | 62 | 43.1% | -6.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K3s | 63 | 44.2% | -5.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J8s | 64 | 37.0% | -13.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T9s | 65 | 35.6% | -14.4 | HIGH CARD |
| Q8o | 66 | 39.9% | -10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 33 | 67 | 50.5% | +0.5 | COINFLIP |
| Q6s | 68 | 40.1% | -9.9 | HIGH CARD |
| K2s | 69 | 44.9% | -5.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J9o | 70 | 38.9% | -11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| K5o | 71 | 33.7% | -16.3 | DOMINATED |
| Q5s | 72 | 32.5% | -17.5 | DOMINATED |
| J7s | 73 | 32.4% | -17.6 | DOMINATED |
| T8s | 74 | 35.7% | -14.3 | HIGH CARD |
| K4o | 75 | 46.3% | -3.7 | HIGH CARD |
| Q7o | 76 | 33.6% | -16.4 | DOMINATED |
| Q4s | 77 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J8o | 78 | 39.0% | -11.0 | HIGH CARD |
| T9o | 79 | 37.8% | -12.2 | HIGH CARD |
| K3o | 80 | 46.9% | -3.1 | HIGH CARD |
| Q3s | 81 | 44.0% | -6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q6o | 82 | 42.9% | -7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 98s | 83 | 35.4% | -14.6 | HIGH CARD |
| T7s | 84 | 31.7% | -18.3 | DOMINATED |
| J6s | 85 | 40.6% | -9.4 | HIGH CARD |
| K2o | 86 | 48.0% | -2.0 | HIGH CARD |
| Q5o | 87 | 33.8% | -16.2 | DOMINATED |
| 22 | 88 | 51.8% | +1.8 | PAIR VS CARDS |
| Q2s | 89 | 44.7% | -5.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J5s | 90 | 33.3% | -16.7 | DOMINATED |
| T8o | 91 | 38.2% | -11.8 | HIGH CARD |
| J7o | 92 | 33.5% | -16.5 | DOMINATED |
| J4s | 93 | 43.7% | -6.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 97s | 94 | 32.9% | -17.1 | DOMINATED |
| Q4o | 95 | 46.1% | -3.9 | HIGH CARD |
| T6s | 96 | 39.6% | -10.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J3s | 97 | 44.2% | -5.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 98o | 98 | 37.7% | -12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| T7o | 99 | 32.8% | -17.2 | DOMINATED |
| Q3o | 100 | 46.8% | -3.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 87s | 101 | 33.3% | -16.7 | DOMINATED |
| J6o | 102 | 43.4% | -6.6 | HIGH CARD |
| J2s | 103 | 44.9% | -5.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 96s | 104 | 39.2% | -10.8 | HIGH CARD |
| Q2o | 105 | 47.7% | -2.3 | HIGH CARD |
| J5o | 106 | 34.6% | -15.4 | DOMINATED |
| T5s | 107 | 34.0% | -16.0 | DOMINATED |
| T4s | 108 | 43.6% | -6.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 97o | 109 | 33.9% | -16.1 | DOMINATED |
| 86s | 110 | 38.9% | -11.1 | HIGH CARD |
| J4o | 111 | 46.2% | -3.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T6o | 112 | 42.3% | -7.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T3s | 113 | 44.0% | -6.0 | HIGH CARD |
| 95s | 114 | 33.9% | -16.1 | DOMINATED |
| 76s | 115 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| J3o | 116 | 46.7% | -3.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 87o | 117 | 34.5% | -15.5 | DOMINATED |
| T2s | 118 | 45.1% | -4.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 85s | 119 | 34.1% | -15.9 | DOMINATED |
| 96o | 120 | 41.6% | -8.4 | HIGH CARD |
| T5o | 121 | 35.1% | -14.9 | DOMINATED |
| J2o | 122 | 47.6% | -2.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 94s | 123 | 44.2% | -5.8 | HIGH CARD |
| T4o | 125 | 46.2% | -3.8 | HIGH CARD |
| 93s | 126 | 44.4% | -5.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 86o | 127 | 41.5% | -8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 65s | 128 | 63.6% | +13.6 | DOMINATING |
| 95o | 129 | 35.2% | -14.8 | DOMINATED |
| 84s | 130 | 44.3% | -5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T3o | 131 | 47.1% | -2.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 92s | 132 | 45.4% | -4.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 76o | 133 | 43.5% | -6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 74s | 134 | 55.7% | +5.7 | HIGH CARD |
| T2o | 135 | 47.7% | -2.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 64s | 136 | 60.1% | +10.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 85o | 137 | 35.3% | -14.7 | DOMINATED |
| 54s | 138 | 63.1% | +13.1 | DOMINATING |
| 83s | 139 | 45.6% | -4.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 94o | 140 | 47.1% | -2.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 75o | 141 | 52.5% | +2.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 82s | 142 | 46.1% | -3.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 73s | 143 | 56.5% | +6.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 65o | 144 | 67.4% | +17.4 | DOMINATING |
| 93o | 145 | 47.4% | -2.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 53s | 146 | 63.8% | +13.8 | DOMINATING |
| 63s | 147 | 61.3% | +11.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 84o | 148 | 46.9% | -3.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 92o | 149 | 48.1% | -1.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 43s | 150 | 62.3% | +12.3 | HIGH CARD |
| 74o | 151 | 58.5% | +8.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 54o | 152 | 66.5% | +16.5 | DOMINATING |
| 72s | 153 | 57.1% | +7.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 52s | 154 | 65.5% | +15.5 | DOMINATING |
| 64o | 155 | 62.9% | +12.9 | HIGH CARD |
| 62s | 156 | 62.6% | +12.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 83o | 157 | 48.3% | -1.7 | HIGH CARD |
| 42s | 158 | 63.5% | +13.5 | HIGH CARD |
| 82o | 159 | 49.1% | -0.9 | COINFLIP |
| 73o | 160 | 59.6% | +9.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 53o | 161 | 67.4% | +17.4 | DOMINATING |
| 63o | 162 | 64.2% | +14.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 32s | 163 | 63.4% | +13.4 | HIGH CARD |
| 43o | 164 | 65.1% | +15.1 | HIGH CARD |
| 72o | 165 | 60.3% | +10.3 | DOMINATING |
| 52o | 166 | 69.5% | +19.5 | DOMINATING |
| 62o | 167 | 65.2% | +15.2 | HIGH CARD |
| 42o | 168 | 66.6% | +16.6 | HIGH CARD |
| 32o | 169 | 66.2% | +16.2 | HIGH CARD |
Showing 168 of 168 rows
Related
FAQ
What is the equity of 75s?
43.7% against one random opponent, which ranks it 124 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 16.6%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 12.4%.
How much better is 75s than 75o?
75s is worth 43.7% and 75o 40.5%, a difference of 3.2 points — rank 124 versus rank 141.
How many of the 168 other hands does 75s beat?
It is a heads-up favourite over 29 hands and an underdog against 139. 3 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.
447 words / 47 distinct figures — Method
