169hands
MENU
suitedone gapper

75s

43.7%
Equity vs one random hand — #124 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
43.7% · #124
6-handed (5 opponents)
16.6% · #88
9-handed (8 opponents)
12.4% · #73
Chen score
5.5
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
29 of 168 hands

75s (seven-five suited) wins 43.7% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 124th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 73.4% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 16.6% and its rank moves to 88; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 12.4% for rank 73. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin 75o runs at 40.5% (rank 141), a gap of 3.2 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 3.2 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 94s at 43.8%, and directly below is T4o at 43.4%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 75s is a favourite against 29 of them and an underdog against 139. Its best matchup is 52o at 69.5% and its worst is 77 at 17.2% — a spread of 52.3 points, which is why calling 75s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 33 at 50.5%.

75s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 52o at 69.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them A7s, which leaves 75s with only 30.8%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 60 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 23.5 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 7.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 75s lands -7.3 points from the middle of the pack, and 123 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 43.7% against one opponent, 30.2% against two, 19.7% against four and 12.4% against eight. That last figure is 112% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5.5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 75s reads as 43.7% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 43.7% against one opponent down to 12.4% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%43.7130.2223.5319.7416.6515.0613.3712.48opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
75s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank75s equityvs 50%Shape
AA121.0%-29.0PAIR VS CARDS
KK221.3%-28.7PAIR VS CARDS
QQ320.8%-29.2PAIR VS CARDS
JJ421.1%-28.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT520.8%-29.2PAIR VS CARDS
99619.6%-30.4PAIR VS CARDS
88718.4%-31.6PAIR VS CARDS
AKs837.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
77917.2%-32.8PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1037.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
AJs1137.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
AKo1240.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
ATs1337.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
AQo1440.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
AJo1539.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
KQs1637.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
661733.5%-16.5PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
ATo1939.5%-10.5HIGH CARD
KJs2037.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
A8s2137.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
KTs2237.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
KQo2339.7%-10.3HIGH CARD
A7s2430.8%-19.2DOMINATED
A9o2539.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
KJo2640.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
552738.7%-11.3PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2836.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
A6s2940.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
K9s3037.4%-12.6HIGH CARD
A8o3139.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
A5s3231.6%-18.4DOMINATED
KTo3339.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
QTs3436.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
A4s3542.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
A7o3632.1%-17.9DOMINATED
K8s3737.7%-12.3HIGH CARD
A3s3843.0%-7.0HIGH CARD
QJo3939.3%-10.7HIGH CARD
K9o4039.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
Q9s4137.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
A5o4233.0%-17.0DOMINATED
A2s4343.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
K7s4432.0%-18.0DOMINATED
A6o4542.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
JTs4635.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
QTo4738.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
444849.4%-0.6COINFLIP
K6s4940.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
A4o5045.3%-4.7HIGH CARD
Q8s5137.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
K8o5240.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
A3o5345.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
K5s5432.3%-17.7DOMINATED
J9s5536.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
Q9o5639.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
JTo5738.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
K7o5833.1%-16.9DOMINATED
K4s5943.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
A2o6046.6%-3.4HIGH CARD
Q7s6132.0%-18.0DOMINATED
K6o6243.1%-6.9HIGH CARD
K3s6344.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
J8s6437.0%-13.0HIGH CARD
T9s6535.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
Q8o6639.9%-10.1HIGH CARD
336750.5%+0.5COINFLIP
Q6s6840.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
K2s6944.9%-5.1HIGH CARD
J9o7038.9%-11.1HIGH CARD
K5o7133.7%-16.3DOMINATED
Q5s7232.5%-17.5DOMINATED
J7s7332.4%-17.6DOMINATED
T8s7435.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
K4o7546.3%-3.7HIGH CARD
Q7o7633.6%-16.4DOMINATED
Q4s7743.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
J8o7839.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
T9o7937.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
K3o8046.9%-3.1HIGH CARD
Q3s8144.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
Q6o8242.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
98s8335.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
T7s8431.7%-18.3DOMINATED
J6s8540.6%-9.4HIGH CARD
K2o8648.0%-2.0HIGH CARD
Q5o8733.8%-16.2DOMINATED
228851.8%+1.8PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8944.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
J5s9033.3%-16.7DOMINATED
T8o9138.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
J7o9233.5%-16.5DOMINATED
J4s9343.7%-6.3HIGH CARD
97s9432.9%-17.1DOMINATED
Q4o9546.1%-3.9HIGH CARD
T6s9639.6%-10.4HIGH CARD
J3s9744.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
98o9837.7%-12.3HIGH CARD
T7o9932.8%-17.2DOMINATED
Q3o10046.8%-3.2HIGH CARD
87s10133.3%-16.7DOMINATED
J6o10243.4%-6.6HIGH CARD
J2s10344.9%-5.1HIGH CARD
96s10439.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
Q2o10547.7%-2.3HIGH CARD
J5o10634.6%-15.4DOMINATED
T5s10734.0%-16.0DOMINATED
T4s10843.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
97o10933.9%-16.1DOMINATED
86s11038.9%-11.1HIGH CARD
J4o11146.2%-3.8HIGH CARD
T6o11242.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
T3s11344.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
95s11433.9%-16.1DOMINATED
76s11541.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
J3o11646.7%-3.3HIGH CARD
87o11734.5%-15.5DOMINATED
T2s11845.1%-4.9HIGH CARD
85s11934.1%-15.9DOMINATED
96o12041.6%-8.4HIGH CARD
T5o12135.1%-14.9DOMINATED
J2o12247.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
94s12344.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
T4o12546.2%-3.8HIGH CARD
93s12644.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
86o12741.5%-8.5HIGH CARD
65s12863.6%+13.6DOMINATING
95o12935.2%-14.8DOMINATED
84s13044.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
T3o13147.1%-2.9HIGH CARD
92s13245.4%-4.6HIGH CARD
76o13343.5%-6.5HIGH CARD
74s13455.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
T2o13547.7%-2.3HIGH CARD
64s13660.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
85o13735.3%-14.7DOMINATED
54s13863.1%+13.1DOMINATING
83s13945.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
94o14047.1%-2.9HIGH CARD
75o14152.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
82s14246.1%-3.9HIGH CARD
73s14356.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
65o14467.4%+17.4DOMINATING
93o14547.4%-2.6HIGH CARD
53s14663.8%+13.8DOMINATING
63s14761.3%+11.3HIGH CARD
84o14846.9%-3.1HIGH CARD
92o14948.1%-1.9HIGH CARD
43s15062.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
74o15158.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
54o15266.5%+16.5DOMINATING
72s15357.1%+7.1HIGH CARD
52s15465.5%+15.5DOMINATING
64o15562.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
62s15662.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
83o15748.3%-1.7HIGH CARD
42s15863.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
82o15949.1%-0.9COINFLIP
73o16059.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
53o16167.4%+17.4DOMINATING
63o16264.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
32s16363.4%+13.4HIGH CARD
43o16465.1%+15.1HIGH CARD
72o16560.3%+10.3DOMINATING
52o16669.5%+19.5DOMINATING
62o16765.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
42o16866.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
32o16966.2%+16.2HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
75o40.5%

FAQ

What is the equity of 75s?

43.7% against one random opponent, which ranks it 124 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 16.6%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 12.4%.

How much better is 75s than 75o?

75s is worth 43.7% and 75o 40.5%, a difference of 3.2 points — rank 124 versus rank 141.

How many of the 168 other hands does 75s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 29 hands and an underdog against 139. 3 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 47 distinct figures — Method