169hands
MENU
suited

K5s

55.7%
Equity vs one random hand — #54 of 169

A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
55.7% · #54
6-handed (5 opponents)
19.8% · #50
9-handed (8 opponents)
14.0% · #48
Chen score
5
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
117 of 168 hands

K5s (king-five suited) wins 55.7% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 54th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 32% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 19.8% and its rank moves to 50; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 14.0% for rank 48. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin K5o runs at 53.2% (rank 71), a gap of 2.5 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.5 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is A3o at 55.9%, and directly below is J9s at 55.7%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K5s is a favourite against 117 of them and an underdog against 51. Its best matchup is Q5o at 75.7% and its worst is KK at 12.0% — a spread of 63.7 points, which is why calling K5s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.5%.

K5s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against Q5o at 75.7%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K5s with only 27.4%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 25 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 11.5 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 19.8 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K5s lands +4.7 points from the middle of the pack, and 53 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 55.7% against one opponent, 37.3% against two, 23.0% against four and 14.0% against eight. That last figure is 126% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 5 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K5s reads as 55.7% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 55.7% against one opponent down to 14.0% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%55.7137.3228.4323.0419.8516.6614.9714.08opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
K5s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankK5s equityvs 50%Shape
AA116.1%-33.9PAIR VS CARDS
KK212.0%-38.0PAIR VS CARDS
QQ331.7%-18.3PAIR VS CARDS
JJ431.9%-18.1PAIR VS CARDS
TT531.7%-18.3PAIR VS CARDS
99632.5%-17.5PAIR VS CARDS
88733.1%-16.9PAIR VS CARDS
AKs827.4%-22.6DOMINATED
77933.2%-16.8PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1036.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
AJs1136.8%-13.2HIGH CARD
AKo1228.4%-21.6DOMINATED
ATs1336.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
AQo1439.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
AJo1539.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
KQs1629.5%-20.5DOMINATED
661733.5%-16.5PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1837.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
ATo1938.8%-11.2HIGH CARD
KJs2030.5%-19.5DOMINATED
A8s2137.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
KTs2231.0%-19.0DOMINATED
KQo2330.8%-19.2DOMINATED
A7s2437.2%-12.8HIGH CARD
A9o2540.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
KJo2631.5%-18.5DOMINATED
552735.2%-14.8PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2855.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
A6s2937.3%-12.7HIGH CARD
K9s3033.4%-16.6DOMINATED
A8o3140.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
A5s3227.6%-22.4DOMINATED
KTo3332.1%-17.9DOMINATED
QTs3455.1%+5.1HIGH CARD
A4s3539.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
A7o3640.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
K8s3736.1%-13.9DOMINATED
A3s3839.7%-10.3HIGH CARD
QJo3958.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
K9o4034.7%-15.3DOMINATED
Q9s4156.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
A5o4228.4%-21.6DOMINATED
A2s4340.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
K7s4438.6%-11.4DOMINATED
A6o4539.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
JTs4654.0%+4.0HIGH CARD
QTo4757.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
444847.6%-2.4PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4942.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
A4o5042.2%-7.8HIGH CARD
Q8s5158.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
K8o5237.7%-12.3DOMINATED
A3o5342.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
J9s5555.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
Q9o5659.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
JTo5756.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
K7o5840.6%-9.4HIGH CARD
K4s5955.2%+5.2HIGH CARD
A2o6042.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
Q7s6159.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
K6o6244.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
K3s6355.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
J8s6456.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
T9s6554.3%+4.3HIGH CARD
Q8o6660.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
336748.5%-1.5PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6859.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
K2s6955.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
J9o7058.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
K5o7152.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
Q5s7271.6%+21.6DOMINATING
J7s7358.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
T8s7455.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
K4o7558.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
Q7o7662.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
Q4s7762.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
J8o7859.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
T9o7956.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
K3o8058.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
Q3s8163.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
Q6o8262.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
98s8355.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
T7s8456.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
J6s8559.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
K2o8658.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
Q5o8775.7%+25.7DOMINATING
228849.5%-0.5COINFLIP
Q2s8963.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
J5s9071.2%+21.2DOMINATING
T8o9158.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
J7o9261.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
J4s9362.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
97s9456.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
Q4o9566.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
T6s9657.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
J3s9762.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
98o9858.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
T7o9959.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
Q3o10066.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
87s10155.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
J6o10262.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
J2s10362.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
96s10457.3%+7.3HIGH CARD
Q2o10566.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
J5o10675.4%+25.4DOMINATING
T5s10771.1%+21.1DOMINATING
T4s10862.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
97o10958.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
86s11056.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
J4o11165.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
T6o11260.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
T3s11362.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
95s11469.9%+19.9DOMINATING
76s11555.8%+5.8HIGH CARD
J3o11665.9%+15.9HIGH CARD
87o11758.5%+8.5HIGH CARD
T2s11862.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
85s11968.9%+18.9DOMINATING
96o12059.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
T5o12175.4%+25.4DOMINATING
J2o12266.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
94s12362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
75s12467.7%+17.7DOMINATING
T4o12565.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
93s12662.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
86o12759.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
65s12866.5%+16.5DOMINATING
95o12973.9%+23.9DOMINATING
84s13062.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
T3o13165.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
92s13262.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
76o13358.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
74s13460.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
T2o13565.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
64s13660.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
85o13773.0%+23.0DOMINATING
54s13867.4%+17.4DOMINATING
83s13963.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
94o14065.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
75o14171.4%+21.4DOMINATING
82s14263.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
73s14362.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
65o14470.3%+20.3DOMINATING
93o14565.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
53s14668.8%+18.8DOMINATING
63s14761.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
84o14864.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
92o14965.4%+15.4HIGH CARD
43s15062.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
74o15163.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
54o15271.1%+21.1DOMINATING
72s15363.2%+13.2HIGH CARD
52s15470.2%+20.2DOMINATING
64o15562.8%+12.8HIGH CARD
62s15662.5%+12.5HIGH CARD
83o15766.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
42s15864.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
82o15965.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
73o16065.0%+15.0HIGH CARD
53o16172.8%+22.8DOMINATING
63o16264.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
32s16364.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
43o16466.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
72o16566.3%+16.3HIGH CARD
52o16674.4%+24.4DOMINATING
62o16765.5%+15.5HIGH CARD
42o16867.4%+17.4HIGH CARD
32o16967.6%+17.6HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
K5o53.2%

FAQ

What is the equity of K5s?

55.7% against one random opponent, which ranks it 54 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 19.8%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 14.0%.

How much better is K5s than K5o?

K5s is worth 55.7% and K5o 53.2%, a difference of 2.5 points — rank 54 versus rank 71.

How many of the 168 other hands does K5s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 117 hands and an underdog against 51. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

447 words / 39 distinct figures — Method