Q5s

Q5s (queen-five suited) wins 52.8% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 72th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 42.6% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 18.2% and its rank moves to 67; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 12.4% for rank 70. A suited hand — the flush adds a few points of raw equity.

Its suited/offsuit twin Q5o runs at 50.2% (rank 87), a gap of 2.6 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.6 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is K5o at 53.2%, and directly below is J7s at 52.4%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.8 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, Q5s is a favourite against 97 of them and an underdog against 71. Its best matchup is J5o at 75.5% and its worst is QQ at 12.4% — a spread of 63.1 points, which is why calling Q5s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.8%.

Q5s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against J5o at 75.5%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AQs, which leaves Q5s with only 27.4%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 34 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 14.4 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 16.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, Q5s lands +1.8 points from the middle of the pack, and 71 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 52.8% against one opponent, 35.0% against two, 21.2% against four and 12.4% against eight. That last figure is 112% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 4 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why Q5s reads as 52.8% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.