169hands
MENU
offsuitbroadwayone gapper

KJo

60.5%
Equity vs one random hand — #26 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
60.5% · #26
6-handed (5 opponents)
23.7% · #23
9-handed (8 opponents)
15.8% · #28
Chen score
7
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
128 of 168 hands

KJo (king-jack offsuit) wins 60.5% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 26th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 15.4% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 23.7% and its rank moves to 23; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 15.8% for rank 28. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin KJs runs at 62.5% (rank 20), a gap of 2 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is A9o at 60.8%, and directly below is 55 at 60.3%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.5 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, KJo is a favourite against 128 of them and an underdog against 40. Its best matchup is J2o at 76.8% and its worst is KK at 9.2% — a spread of 67.6 points, which is why calling KJo simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 1 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 22 at 49.1%.

KJo dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against J2o at 76.8%. It is dominated by 6 hands in return, the worst of them AJs, which leaves KJo with only 24.4%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 7 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 4.9 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 28.2 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, KJo lands +9.5 points from the middle of the pack, and 25 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 60.5% against one opponent, 43.2% against two, 27.9% against four and 15.8% against eight. That last figure is 142% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 7 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why KJo reads as 60.5% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 60.5% against one opponent down to 15.8% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%35%70%60.5143.2233.5327.9423.7520.2617.9715.88opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
KJo played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankKJo equityvs 50%Shape
AA113.4%-36.6PAIR VS CARDS
KK29.2%-40.8PAIR VS CARDS
QQ328.3%-21.7PAIR VS CARDS
JJ431.5%-18.5PAIR VS CARDS
TT543.4%-6.6PAIR VS CARDS
99644.6%-5.4PAIR VS CARDS
88746.1%-3.9PAIR VS CARDS
AKs824.8%-25.2DOMINATED
77946.0%-4.0PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1035.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
AJs1124.4%-25.6DOMINATED
AKo1225.7%-24.3DOMINATED
ATs1338.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
AQo1437.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
AJo1525.5%-24.5DOMINATED
KQs1625.1%-24.9DOMINATED
661747.1%-2.9PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1840.0%-10.0HIGH CARD
ATo1940.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
KJs2047.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
A8s2140.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
KTs2268.7%+18.7DOMINATING
KQo2325.9%-24.1DOMINATED
A7s2440.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
A9o2542.0%-8.0HIGH CARD
552747.3%-2.7PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2869.7%+19.7DOMINATING
A6s2940.8%-9.2HIGH CARD
K9s3068.9%+18.9DOMINATING
A8o3142.5%-7.5HIGH CARD
A5s3240.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
KTo3373.0%+23.0DOMINATING
QTs3459.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
A4s3540.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
A7o3642.5%-7.5HIGH CARD
K8s3768.7%+18.7DOMINATING
A3s3840.4%-9.6HIGH CARD
QJo3973.8%+23.8DOMINATING
K9o4073.0%+23.0DOMINATING
Q9s4160.3%+10.3HIGH CARD
A5o4242.4%-7.6HIGH CARD
A2s4340.1%-9.9HIGH CARD
K7s4468.7%+18.7DOMINATING
A6o4542.9%-7.1HIGH CARD
JTs4668.3%+18.3DOMINATING
QTo4762.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
444847.8%-2.2PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4968.6%+18.6DOMINATING
A4o5042.3%-7.7HIGH CARD
Q8s5161.1%+11.1HIGH CARD
K8o5273.0%+23.0DOMINATING
A3o5342.6%-7.4HIGH CARD
K5s5468.5%+18.5DOMINATING
J9s5568.8%+18.8DOMINATING
Q9o5664.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
JTo5772.3%+22.3DOMINATING
K7o5872.9%+22.9DOMINATING
K4s5968.7%+18.7DOMINATING
A2o6042.5%-7.5HIGH CARD
Q7s6162.3%+12.3HIGH CARD
K6o6272.9%+22.9DOMINATING
K3s6369.2%+19.2DOMINATING
J8s6470.2%+20.2DOMINATING
T9s6560.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
Q8o6664.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
336748.4%-1.6PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6862.0%+12.0HIGH CARD
K2s6969.9%+19.9DOMINATING
J9o7072.9%+22.9DOMINATING
K5o7172.5%+22.5DOMINATING
Q5s7261.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
J7s7369.8%+19.8DOMINATING
T8s7461.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
K4o7573.2%+23.2DOMINATING
Q7o7665.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
Q4s7761.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
J8o7874.4%+24.4DOMINATING
T9o7964.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
K3o8073.5%+23.5DOMINATING
Q3s8162.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
Q6o8265.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
98s8360.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
T7s8462.6%+12.6HIGH CARD
J6s8571.1%+21.1DOMINATING
K2o8674.0%+24.0DOMINATING
Q5o8765.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
228849.1%-0.9COINFLIP
Q2s8962.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
J5s9070.8%+20.8DOMINATING
T8o9165.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
J7o9274.3%+24.3DOMINATING
J4s9371.4%+21.4DOMINATING
97s9460.7%+10.7HIGH CARD
Q4o9565.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
T6s9663.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
J3s9771.6%+21.6DOMINATING
98o9863.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
T7o9966.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
Q3o10066.0%+16.0HIGH CARD
87s10159.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
J6o10275.7%+25.7DOMINATING
J2s10372.2%+22.2DOMINATING
96s10461.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
Q2o10566.4%+16.4HIGH CARD
J5o10675.2%+25.2DOMINATING
T5s10764.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
T4s10864.7%+14.7HIGH CARD
97o10964.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
86s11060.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
J4o11175.8%+25.8DOMINATING
T6o11267.6%+17.6HIGH CARD
T3s11365.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
95s11462.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
76s11559.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
J3o11676.3%+26.3DOMINATING
87o11763.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
T2s11865.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
85s11961.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
96o12065.7%+15.7HIGH CARD
T5o12168.7%+18.7HIGH CARD
J2o12276.8%+26.8DOMINATING
94s12364.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
75s12460.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
T4o12568.6%+18.6HIGH CARD
93s12663.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
86o12764.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
65s12859.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
95o12966.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
84s13062.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
T3o13169.0%+19.0HIGH CARD
92s13264.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
76o13363.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
74s13461.5%+11.5HIGH CARD
T2o13569.4%+19.4HIGH CARD
64s13660.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
85o13765.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
54s13859.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
83s13964.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
94o14068.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
75o14163.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
82s14264.1%+14.1HIGH CARD
73s14362.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
65o14463.0%+13.0HIGH CARD
93o14568.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
53s14660.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
63s14761.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
84o14866.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
92o14968.5%+18.5HIGH CARD
43s15060.9%+10.9HIGH CARD
74o15165.2%+15.2HIGH CARD
54o15262.9%+12.9HIGH CARD
72s15364.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
52s15461.6%+11.6HIGH CARD
64o15564.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
62s15663.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
83o15768.1%+18.1HIGH CARD
42s15862.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
82o15968.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
73o16066.5%+16.5HIGH CARD
53o16164.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
63o16265.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
32s16362.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
43o16464.6%+14.6HIGH CARD
72o16568.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
52o16665.6%+15.6HIGH CARD
62o16767.2%+17.2HIGH CARD
42o16865.8%+15.8HIGH CARD
32o16966.2%+16.2HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
KJs62.5%

FAQ

What is the equity of KJo?

60.5% against one random opponent, which ranks it 26 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 23.7%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 15.8%.

How much better is KJo than KJs?

KJo is worth 60.5% and KJs 62.5%, a difference of 2 points — rank 26 versus rank 20.

How many of the 168 other hands does KJo beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 128 hands and an underdog against 40. 1 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 43 distinct figures — Method