169hands
MENU
suitedconnector

87s

47.9%
Equity vs one random hand — #101 of 169

A suited connector — straight and flush draws in the same holding.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
47.9% · #101
6-handed (5 opponents)
19.2% · #52
9-handed (8 opponents)
14.0% · #49
Chen score
7
Combos
4 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.3%
Favourite against
44 of 168 hands

87s (eight-seven suited) wins 47.9% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 101th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 59.8% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 19.2% and its rank moves to 52; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 14.0% for rank 49. A suited connector — straight and flush draws in the same holding.

Its suited/offsuit twin 87o runs at 45.1% (rank 117), a gap of 2.8 points. Sharing a suit is worth exactly those 2.8 points here — nothing about the ranks changes. The hand directly above it in the ranking is Q3o at 48.1%, and directly below is J6o at 47.8%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, 87s is a favourite against 44 of them and an underdog against 124. Its best matchup is 73o at 73.4% and its worst is 88 at 18.0% — a spread of 55.4 points, which is why calling 87s simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 8 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being 55 at 50.0%.

87s dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 73o at 73.4%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them Q8s, which leaves 87s with only 31.6%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 suited hands it comes 48 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKs, is 19.3 points away, and the weakest, 32s, sits 12 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, 87s lands -3.1 points from the middle of the pack, and 100 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 47.9% against one opponent, 33.7% against two, 22.4% against four and 14.0% against eight. That last figure is 126% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 7 points, and it arrives 0.3% of the time (4 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why 87s reads as 47.9% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 47.9% against one opponent down to 14.0% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%47.9133.7226.8322.4419.2516.7615.1714.08opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
87s played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rank87s equityvs 50%Shape
AA122.4%-27.6PAIR VS CARDS
KK222.1%-27.9PAIR VS CARDS
QQ321.8%-28.2PAIR VS CARDS
JJ421.0%-29.0PAIR VS CARDS
TT519.8%-30.2PAIR VS CARDS
99618.4%-31.6PAIR VS CARDS
88718.0%-32.0PAIR VS CARDS
AKs838.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
77939.2%-10.8PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1038.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
AJs1138.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
AKo1241.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
ATs1338.5%-11.5HIGH CARD
AQo1440.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
AJo1541.0%-9.0HIGH CARD
KQs1636.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
661749.1%-0.9COINFLIP
A9s1838.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
ATo1940.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
KJs2037.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
A8s2132.5%-17.5DOMINATED
KTs2237.9%-12.1HIGH CARD
KQo2339.1%-10.9HIGH CARD
A7s2433.0%-17.0DOMINATED
A9o2541.3%-8.7HIGH CARD
KJo2640.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
552750.0%+0.0COINFLIP
QJs2836.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
A6s2944.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
K9s3038.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
A8o3133.9%-16.1DOMINATED
A5s3244.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
KTo3340.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
QTs3436.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
A4s3544.6%-5.4HIGH CARD
A7o3634.4%-15.6DOMINATED
K8s3732.8%-17.2DOMINATED
A3s3845.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
QJo3939.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
K9o4040.9%-9.1HIGH CARD
Q9s4137.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
A5o4247.0%-3.0HIGH CARD
A2s4345.4%-4.6HIGH CARD
K7s4433.1%-16.9DOMINATED
A6o4546.9%-3.1HIGH CARD
JTs4636.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
QTo4739.2%-10.8HIGH CARD
444851.4%+1.4PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4944.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
A4o5047.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
Q8s5131.6%-18.4DOMINATED
K8o5234.4%-15.6DOMINATED
A3o5348.2%-1.8HIGH CARD
K5s5444.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
J9s5536.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
Q9o5639.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
JTo5738.7%-11.3HIGH CARD
K7o5834.4%-15.6DOMINATED
K4s5945.0%-5.0HIGH CARD
A2o6048.7%-1.3HIGH CARD
Q7s6133.5%-16.5DOMINATED
K6o6246.8%-3.2HIGH CARD
K3s6346.1%-3.9HIGH CARD
J8s6432.2%-17.8DOMINATED
T9s6535.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
Q8o6633.0%-17.0DOMINATED
336752.8%+2.8PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6843.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
K2s6945.9%-4.1HIGH CARD
J9o7039.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
K5o7147.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
Q5s7244.4%-5.6HIGH CARD
J7s7333.1%-16.9DOMINATED
T8s7432.0%-18.0DOMINATED
K4o7547.7%-2.3HIGH CARD
Q7o7634.7%-15.3DOMINATED
Q4s7744.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
J8o7833.6%-16.4DOMINATED
T9o7937.8%-12.2HIGH CARD
K3o8048.7%-1.3HIGH CARD
Q3s8145.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
Q6o8246.4%-3.6HIGH CARD
98s8331.8%-18.2DOMINATED
T7s8432.6%-17.4DOMINATED
J6s8544.2%-5.8HIGH CARD
K2o8648.8%-1.2HIGH CARD
Q5o8747.0%-3.0HIGH CARD
228853.2%+3.2PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8945.6%-4.4HIGH CARD
J5s9044.7%-5.3HIGH CARD
T8o9133.3%-16.7DOMINATED
J7o9234.4%-15.6DOMINATED
J4s9345.1%-4.9HIGH CARD
97s9432.3%-17.7DOMINATED
Q4o9547.8%-2.2HIGH CARD
T6s9643.7%-6.3HIGH CARD
J3s9745.8%-4.2HIGH CARD
98o9832.7%-17.3DOMINATED
T7o9933.6%-16.4DOMINATED
Q3o10048.5%-1.5HIGH CARD
J6o10247.2%-2.8HIGH CARD
J2s10346.1%-3.9HIGH CARD
96s10443.6%-6.4HIGH CARD
Q2o10548.4%-1.6HIGH CARD
J5o10647.4%-2.6HIGH CARD
T5s10744.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
T4s10845.4%-4.6HIGH CARD
97o10933.5%-16.5DOMINATED
86s11061.6%+11.6DOMINATING
J4o11148.1%-1.9HIGH CARD
T6o11246.5%-3.5HIGH CARD
T3s11346.2%-3.8HIGH CARD
95s11444.8%-5.2HIGH CARD
76s11566.5%+16.5DOMINATING
J3o11649.0%-1.0COINFLIP
87o11752.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
T2s11846.1%-3.9HIGH CARD
85s11962.1%+12.1DOMINATING
96o12046.3%-3.7HIGH CARD
T5o12147.6%-2.4HIGH CARD
J2o12249.0%-1.0COINFLIP
94s12346.0%-4.0HIGH CARD
75s12466.7%+16.7DOMINATING
T4o12548.0%-2.0HIGH CARD
93s12646.7%-3.3HIGH CARD
86o12765.2%+15.2DOMINATING
65s12863.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
95o12947.2%-2.8HIGH CARD
84s13062.3%+12.3DOMINATING
T3o13149.0%-1.0COINFLIP
92s13246.7%-3.3HIGH CARD
76o13370.5%+20.5DOMINATING
74s13467.5%+17.5DOMINATING
T2o13549.2%-0.8COINFLIP
64s13664.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
85o13765.4%+15.4DOMINATING
54s13862.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
83s13963.1%+13.1DOMINATING
94o14049.1%-0.9COINFLIP
75o14170.5%+20.5DOMINATING
82s14263.2%+13.2DOMINATING
73s14369.1%+19.1DOMINATING
65o14466.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
93o14549.8%-0.2COINFLIP
53s14663.6%+13.6HIGH CARD
63s14765.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
84o14866.1%+16.1DOMINATING
92o14949.7%-0.3COINFLIP
43s15064.0%+14.0HIGH CARD
74o15171.4%+21.4DOMINATING
54o15265.3%+15.3HIGH CARD
72s15369.2%+19.2DOMINATING
52s15464.9%+14.9HIGH CARD
64o15567.2%+17.2HIGH CARD
62s15666.6%+16.6HIGH CARD
83o15766.7%+16.7DOMINATING
42s15864.8%+14.8HIGH CARD
82o15966.9%+16.9DOMINATING
73o16073.4%+23.4DOMINATING
53o16166.5%+16.5HIGH CARD
63o16268.6%+18.6HIGH CARD
32s16366.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
43o16467.0%+17.0HIGH CARD
72o16573.4%+23.4DOMINATING
52o16668.0%+18.0HIGH CARD
62o16769.9%+19.9HIGH CARD
42o16867.8%+17.8HIGH CARD
32o16969.1%+19.1HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
87o45.1%

FAQ

What is the equity of 87s?

47.9% against one random opponent, which ranks it 101 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 19.2%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 14.0%.

How much better is 87s than 87o?

87s is worth 47.9% and 87o 45.1%, a difference of 2.8 points — rank 101 versus rank 117.

How many of the 168 other hands does 87s beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 44 hands and an underdog against 124. 8 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

446 words / 45 distinct figures — Method