169hands
MENU
offsuit

K2o

50.4%
Equity vs one random hand — #86 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
50.4% · #86
6-handed (5 opponents)
13.7% · #127
9-handed (8 opponents)
8.8% · #133
Chen score
3
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
110 of 168 hands

K2o (king-deuce offsuit) wins 50.4% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 86th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 50.9% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 13.7% and its rank moves to 127; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 8.8% for rank 133. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin K2s runs at 53.2% (rank 69), a gap of 2.8 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.8 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J6s at 50.5%, and directly below is Q5o at 50.2%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.3 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K2o is a favourite against 110 of them and an underdog against 58. Its best matchup is Q2o at 75.4% and its worst is KK at 5.4% — a spread of 70 points, which is why calling K2o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 2 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being JTs at 50.8%.

K2o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against Q2o at 75.4%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K2o with only 21.6%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 33 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 15 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 18.1 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K2o lands -0.6 points from the middle of the pack, and 85 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 50.4% against one opponent, 31.3% against two, 17.2% against four and 8.8% against eight. That last figure is 79% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K2o reads as 50.4% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 50.4% against one opponent down to 8.8% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%50.4131.3222.4317.2413.7511.7610.278.88opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
K2o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankK2o equityvs 50%Shape
AA110.7%-39.3PAIR VS CARDS
KK25.4%-44.6PAIR VS CARDS
QQ326.8%-23.2PAIR VS CARDS
JJ427.3%-22.7PAIR VS CARDS
TT527.0%-23.0PAIR VS CARDS
99627.9%-22.1PAIR VS CARDS
88728.8%-21.2PAIR VS CARDS
AKs821.6%-28.4DOMINATED
77928.6%-21.4PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1032.7%-17.3HIGH CARD
AJs1132.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
AKo1222.3%-27.7DOMINATED
ATs1332.3%-17.7HIGH CARD
AQo1434.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
AJo1534.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
KQs1623.9%-26.1DOMINATED
661729.4%-20.6PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1833.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
ATo1934.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
KJs2024.8%-25.2DOMINATED
A8s2133.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
KTs2226.1%-23.9DOMINATED
KQo2325.1%-24.9DOMINATED
A7s2433.6%-16.4HIGH CARD
A9o2535.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
KJo2626.0%-24.0DOMINATED
552729.7%-20.3PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2852.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
A6s2933.9%-16.1HIGH CARD
K9s3028.3%-21.7DOMINATED
A8o3135.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
A5s3232.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
KTo3327.2%-22.8DOMINATED
QTs3452.1%+2.1HIGH CARD
A4s3532.8%-17.2HIGH CARD
A7o3635.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
K8s3731.7%-18.3DOMINATED
A3s3832.9%-17.1HIGH CARD
QJo3955.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
K9o4029.7%-20.3DOMINATED
Q9s4153.5%+3.5HIGH CARD
A5o4234.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
A2s4322.8%-27.2DOMINATED
K7s4434.4%-15.6DOMINATED
A6o4535.8%-14.2HIGH CARD
JTs4650.8%+0.8COINFLIP
QTo4755.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
444830.4%-19.6PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4938.2%-11.8DOMINATED
A4o5034.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
Q8s5154.5%+4.5HIGH CARD
K8o5233.1%-16.9DOMINATED
A3o5334.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
K5s5441.4%-8.6HIGH CARD
J9s5552.4%+2.4HIGH CARD
Q9o5656.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
JTo5754.1%+4.1HIGH CARD
K7o5836.0%-14.0DOMINATED
K4s5943.9%-6.1HIGH CARD
A2o6023.7%-26.3DOMINATED
Q7s6155.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
K6o6240.2%-9.8HIGH CARD
K3s6344.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
J8s6453.6%+3.6HIGH CARD
T9s6551.1%+1.1HIGH CARD
Q8o6657.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
336730.9%-19.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6855.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
K2s6947.4%-2.6HIGH CARD
J9o7055.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
K5o7143.8%-6.2HIGH CARD
Q5s7256.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
J7s7354.3%+4.3HIGH CARD
T8s7452.4%+2.4HIGH CARD
K4o7546.4%-3.6HIGH CARD
Q7o7659.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
Q4s7756.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
J8o7856.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
T9o7954.3%+4.3HIGH CARD
K3o8046.7%-3.3HIGH CARD
Q3s8156.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
Q6o8258.8%+8.8HIGH CARD
98s8351.4%+1.4HIGH CARD
T7s8453.1%+3.1HIGH CARD
J6s8555.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
Q5o8759.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
228832.9%-17.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8970.9%+20.9DOMINATING
J5s9055.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
T8o9155.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
J7o9257.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
J4s9355.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
97s9451.8%+1.8HIGH CARD
Q4o9559.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
T6s9654.4%+4.4HIGH CARD
J3s9756.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
98o9854.7%+4.7HIGH CARD
T7o9956.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
Q3o10060.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
87s10151.2%+1.2HIGH CARD
J6o10259.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
J2s10370.7%+20.7DOMINATING
96s10453.3%+3.3HIGH CARD
Q2o10575.4%+25.4DOMINATING
J5o10658.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
T5s10755.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
T4s10855.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
97o10955.2%+5.2HIGH CARD
86s11052.3%+2.3HIGH CARD
J4o11159.3%+9.3HIGH CARD
T6o11257.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
T3s11356.0%+6.0HIGH CARD
95s11454.5%+4.5HIGH CARD
76s11550.9%+0.9COINFLIP
J3o11659.6%+9.6HIGH CARD
87o11754.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
T2s11870.3%+20.3DOMINATING
85s11953.7%+3.7HIGH CARD
96o12056.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
T5o12159.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
J2o12275.0%+25.0DOMINATING
94s12355.8%+5.8HIGH CARD
75s12452.0%+2.0HIGH CARD
T4o12559.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
93s12655.8%+5.8HIGH CARD
86o12755.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
65s12851.7%+1.7HIGH CARD
95o12957.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
84s13054.9%+4.9HIGH CARD
T3o13159.5%+9.5HIGH CARD
92s13270.1%+20.1DOMINATING
76o13353.7%+3.7HIGH CARD
74s13453.5%+3.5HIGH CARD
T2o13574.7%+24.7DOMINATING
64s13653.0%+3.0HIGH CARD
85o13756.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
54s13852.3%+2.3HIGH CARD
83s13956.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
94o14059.0%+9.0HIGH CARD
75o14155.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
82s14270.1%+20.1DOMINATING
73s14354.6%+4.6HIGH CARD
65o14454.9%+4.9HIGH CARD
93o14559.1%+9.1HIGH CARD
53s14653.3%+3.3HIGH CARD
63s14754.4%+4.4HIGH CARD
84o14858.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
92o14974.2%+24.2DOMINATING
43s15054.0%+4.0HIGH CARD
74o15156.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
54o15255.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
72s15369.8%+19.8DOMINATING
52s15467.7%+17.7DOMINATING
64o15556.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
62s15668.9%+18.9DOMINATING
83o15759.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
42s15868.1%+18.1DOMINATING
82o15974.4%+24.4DOMINATING
73o16058.0%+8.0HIGH CARD
53o16156.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
63o16257.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
32s16368.5%+18.5DOMINATING
43o16456.9%+6.9HIGH CARD
72o16574.3%+24.3DOMINATING
52o16671.6%+21.6DOMINATING
62o16773.0%+23.0DOMINATING
42o16872.1%+22.1DOMINATING
32o16972.6%+22.6DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
K2s53.2%

FAQ

What is the equity of K2o?

50.4% against one random opponent, which ranks it 86 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 13.7%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 8.8%.

How much better is K2o than K2s?

K2o is worth 50.4% and K2s 53.2%, a difference of 2.8 points — rank 86 versus rank 69.

How many of the 168 other hands does K2o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 110 hands and an underdog against 58. 2 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 43 distinct figures — Method