169hands
MENU
offsuit

T3o

42.6%
Equity vs one random hand — #131 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
42.6% · #131
6-handed (5 opponents)
11.1% · #154
9-handed (8 opponents)
6.8% · #158
Chen score
0
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
58 of 168 hands

T3o (ten-three offsuit) wins 42.6% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 131th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 77.5% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 11.1% and its rank moves to 154; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 6.8% for rank 158. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin T3s runs at 45.7% (rank 113), a gap of 3.1 points. Losing the shared suit costs 3.1 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is 84s at 42.7%, and directly below is 92s at 42.5%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.2 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, T3o is a favourite against 58 of them and an underdog against 110. Its best matchup is 93o at 73.3% and its worst is TT at 6.9% — a spread of 66.4 points, which is why calling T3o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little. 3 opponents land inside one point of a coinflip, the closest being T2s at 50.2%.

T3o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against 93o at 73.3%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them ATs, which leaves T3o with only 22.5%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 55 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 22.8 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 10.3 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, T3o lands -8.4 points from the middle of the pack, and 130 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 42.6% against one opponent, 25.7% against two, 13.9% against four and 6.8% against eight. That last figure is 61% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 0 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why T3o reads as 42.6% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 42.6% against one opponent down to 6.8% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%25%50%42.6125.7217.8313.9411.159.067.776.88opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
T3o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankT3o equityvs 50%Shape
AA112.6%-37.4PAIR VS CARDS
KK212.5%-37.5PAIR VS CARDS
QQ312.1%-37.9PAIR VS CARDS
JJ411.8%-38.2PAIR VS CARDS
TT56.9%-43.1PAIR VS CARDS
99627.9%-22.1PAIR VS CARDS
88728.4%-21.6PAIR VS CARDS
AKs830.9%-19.1HIGH CARD
77929.3%-20.7PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1030.4%-19.6HIGH CARD
AJs1130.2%-19.8HIGH CARD
AKo1232.2%-17.8HIGH CARD
ATs1322.5%-27.5DOMINATED
AQo1431.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
AJo1531.7%-18.3HIGH CARD
KQs1629.8%-20.2HIGH CARD
661730.1%-19.9PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1834.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
ATo1923.3%-26.7DOMINATED
KJs2029.6%-20.4HIGH CARD
A8s2134.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
KTs2223.1%-26.9DOMINATED
KQo2331.3%-18.7HIGH CARD
A7s2434.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
A9o2536.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
KJo2631.0%-19.0HIGH CARD
552730.8%-19.2PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2828.6%-21.4HIGH CARD
A6s2934.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
K9s3033.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
A8o3136.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
A5s3234.0%-16.0HIGH CARD
KTo3323.9%-26.1DOMINATED
QTs3423.3%-26.7DOMINATED
A4s3534.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
A7o3636.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
K8s3734.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
A3s3823.9%-26.1DOMINATED
QJo3929.8%-20.2HIGH CARD
K9o4035.5%-14.5HIGH CARD
Q9s4132.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
A5o4235.7%-14.3HIGH CARD
A2s4337.6%-12.4HIGH CARD
K7s4434.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
A6o4536.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
JTs4623.5%-26.5DOMINATED
QTo4724.1%-25.9DOMINATED
444831.4%-18.6PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4934.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
A4o5035.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
Q8s5133.5%-16.5HIGH CARD
K8o5236.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
A3o5325.0%-25.0DOMINATED
K5s5434.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
J9s5531.9%-18.1HIGH CARD
Q9o5634.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
JTo5724.1%-25.9DOMINATED
K7o5836.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
K4s5934.7%-15.3HIGH CARD
A2o6039.8%-10.2HIGH CARD
Q7s6134.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
K6o6236.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
K3s6324.6%-25.4DOMINATED
J8s6432.6%-17.4HIGH CARD
T9s6528.2%-21.8DOMINATED
Q8o6635.2%-14.8HIGH CARD
336732.9%-17.1PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6834.4%-15.6HIGH CARD
K2s6938.7%-11.3HIGH CARD
J9o7033.3%-16.7HIGH CARD
K5o7136.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
Q5s7234.5%-15.5HIGH CARD
J7s7333.7%-16.3HIGH CARD
T8s7430.5%-19.5DOMINATED
K4o7536.5%-13.5HIGH CARD
Q7o7636.6%-13.4HIGH CARD
Q4s7734.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
J8o7834.1%-15.9HIGH CARD
T9o7929.7%-20.3DOMINATED
K3o8025.6%-24.4DOMINATED
Q3s8124.8%-25.2DOMINATED
Q6o8236.3%-13.7HIGH CARD
98s8351.0%+1.0COINFLIP
T7s8433.8%-16.2DOMINATED
J6s8534.8%-15.2HIGH CARD
K2o8640.5%-9.5HIGH CARD
Q5o8736.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
228846.7%-3.3PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8938.2%-11.8HIGH CARD
J5s9034.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
T8o9132.1%-17.9DOMINATED
J7o9235.6%-14.4HIGH CARD
J4s9334.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
97s9452.3%+2.3HIGH CARD
Q4o9536.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
T6s9637.8%-12.2DOMINATED
J3s9724.8%-25.2DOMINATED
98o9854.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
T7o9935.8%-14.2DOMINATED
Q3o10025.7%-24.3DOMINATED
87s10151.0%+1.0COINFLIP
J6o10236.2%-13.8HIGH CARD
J2s10338.3%-11.7HIGH CARD
96s10453.9%+3.9HIGH CARD
Q2o10540.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
J5o10636.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
T5s10741.8%-8.2HIGH CARD
T4s10844.3%-5.7HIGH CARD
97o10955.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
86s11052.2%+2.2HIGH CARD
J4o11136.0%-14.0HIGH CARD
T6o11240.0%-10.0DOMINATED
T3s11347.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
95s11455.2%+5.2HIGH CARD
76s11551.7%+1.7HIGH CARD
J3o11626.1%-23.9DOMINATED
87o11754.0%+4.0HIGH CARD
T2s11850.2%+0.2COINFLIP
85s11953.8%+3.8HIGH CARD
96o12057.1%+7.1HIGH CARD
T5o12144.0%-6.0HIGH CARD
J2o12240.3%-9.7HIGH CARD
94s12356.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
75s12452.9%+2.9HIGH CARD
T4o12546.8%-3.2HIGH CARD
93s12668.9%+18.9DOMINATING
86o12755.4%+5.4HIGH CARD
65s12852.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
95o12958.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
84s13054.9%+4.9HIGH CARD
92s13259.9%+9.9HIGH CARD
76o13354.8%+4.8HIGH CARD
74s13454.5%+4.5HIGH CARD
T2o13553.1%+3.1HIGH CARD
64s13653.6%+3.6HIGH CARD
85o13756.8%+6.8HIGH CARD
54s13852.7%+2.7HIGH CARD
83s13969.0%+19.0DOMINATING
94o14059.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
75o14156.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
82s14259.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
73s14367.4%+17.4DOMINATING
65o14455.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
93o14573.3%+23.3DOMINATING
53s14664.9%+14.9DOMINATING
63s14766.2%+16.2DOMINATING
84o14858.3%+8.3HIGH CARD
92o14963.5%+13.5HIGH CARD
43s15065.0%+15.0DOMINATING
74o15157.7%+7.7HIGH CARD
54o15255.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
72s15360.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
52s15457.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
64o15556.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
62s15659.2%+9.2HIGH CARD
83o15773.1%+23.1DOMINATING
42s15858.1%+8.1HIGH CARD
82o15963.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
73o16071.5%+21.5DOMINATING
53o16168.6%+18.6DOMINATING
63o16269.9%+19.9DOMINATING
32s16367.4%+17.4DOMINATING
43o16468.7%+18.7DOMINATING
72o16563.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
52o16661.7%+11.7HIGH CARD
62o16762.7%+12.7HIGH CARD
42o16861.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
32o16971.6%+21.6DOMINATING

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
T3s45.7%

FAQ

What is the equity of T3o?

42.6% against one random opponent, which ranks it 131 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 11.1%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 6.8%.

How much better is T3o than T3s?

T3o is worth 42.6% and T3s 45.7%, a difference of 3.1 points — rank 131 versus rank 113.

How many of the 168 other hands does T3o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 58 hands and an underdog against 110. 3 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

440 words / 44 distinct figures — Method