169hands
MENU
offsuit

K5o

53.2%
Equity vs one random hand — #71 of 169

Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Heads-up (1 opponent)
53.2% · #71
6-handed (5 opponents)
15.3% · #104
9-handed (8 opponents)
9.6% · #122
Chen score
3
Combos
12 / 1,326
Dealt frequency
0.9%
Favourite against
116 of 168 hands

K5o (king-five offsuit) wins 53.2% of the time against a single random opponent, which places it 71th out of the 169 starting hands — the top 42% of the range. At a six-handed table (five opponents) its equity falls to 15.3% and its rank moves to 104; nine-handed (eight opponents) it holds 9.6% for rank 122. Two unconnected offsuit cards — the class of hand most often overvalued.

Its suited/offsuit twin K5s runs at 55.7% (rank 54), a gap of 2.5 points. Losing the shared suit costs 2.5 points of raw equity. The hand directly above it in the ranking is J9o at 53.2%, and directly below is Q5s at 52.8%, so three hands are packed into a band of 0.4 points.

Played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands, K5o is a favourite against 116 of them and an underdog against 52. Its best matchup is Q5o at 74.8% and its worst is KK at 6.8% — a spread of 68 points, which is why calling K5o simply "strong" or "weak" says very little.

K5o dominates 8 hands that share one of its ranks, pushing hardest against Q5o at 74.8%. It is dominated by 8 hands in return, the worst of them AKs, which leaves K5o with only 23.0%. A single kicker can move the number by tens of points, and the full table below lists every one of those opponents.

Within the 78 offsuit hands it comes 26 of 78. The strongest hand in that group, AKo, is 12.2 points away, and the weakest, 32o, sits 20.9 points below. Measured against the average equity of all 169 hands, 51%, K5o lands +2.2 points from the middle of the pack, and 70 hands in the full ranking are still ahead of it.

Adding players costs equity steadily: 53.2% against one opponent, 34.1% against two, 18.6% against four and 9.6% against eight. That last figure is 86% of an even nine-way share (11.1%). The Chen formula scores this hand at 3 points, and it arrives 0.9% of the time (12 of 1,326 combinations).

One caveat worth repeating: every number on this page assumes the opponent holds a completely random hand and that the pot goes to showdown. Real opponents hold ranges, and a range that has already put money in is stronger than random — which is exactly why K5o reads as 53.2% here but plays worse than that against a raise. Use the 168 rows in the table below to see which specific holdings are the problem, rather than treating the headline figure as a verdict on the hand.

By player count

Equity by opponent count

From 53.2% against one opponent down to 9.6% against eight. The x-axis is the number of opponents.

0%30%60%53.2134.1224.5318.6415.3512.7611.079.68opponents
Matchups

Against all 168 other hands

200,000 simulated showdowns per pairing. Opponent names link to that hand's page; the shape column links to the matchup page where one exists.

Sort
K5o played heads-up against each of the other 168 hands
Opponent handOpp. rankK5o equityvs 50%Shape
AA111.9%-38.1PAIR VS CARDS
KK26.8%-43.2PAIR VS CARDS
QQ328.3%-21.7PAIR VS CARDS
JJ428.1%-21.9PAIR VS CARDS
TT528.1%-21.9PAIR VS CARDS
99628.9%-21.1PAIR VS CARDS
88729.5%-20.5PAIR VS CARDS
AKs823.0%-27.0DOMINATED
77929.5%-20.5PAIR VS CARDS
AQs1033.8%-16.2HIGH CARD
AJs1133.4%-16.6HIGH CARD
AKo1224.0%-26.0DOMINATED
ATs1333.2%-16.8HIGH CARD
AQo1435.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
AJo1535.4%-14.6HIGH CARD
KQs1625.3%-24.7DOMINATED
661729.8%-20.2PAIR VS CARDS
A9s1834.9%-15.1HIGH CARD
ATo1935.0%-15.0HIGH CARD
KJs2026.1%-23.9DOMINATED
A8s2134.6%-15.4HIGH CARD
KTs2227.0%-23.0DOMINATED
KQo2326.3%-23.7DOMINATED
A7s2434.2%-15.8HIGH CARD
A9o2536.7%-13.3HIGH CARD
KJo2627.5%-22.5DOMINATED
552731.4%-18.6PAIR VS CARDS
QJs2852.7%+2.7HIGH CARD
A6s2934.3%-15.7HIGH CARD
K9s3029.6%-20.4DOMINATED
A8o3136.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
A5s3223.4%-26.6DOMINATED
KTo3328.2%-21.8DOMINATED
QTs3452.4%+2.4HIGH CARD
A4s3536.4%-13.6HIGH CARD
A7o3635.9%-14.1HIGH CARD
K8s3732.5%-17.5DOMINATED
A3s3837.1%-12.9HIGH CARD
QJo3955.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
K9o4030.7%-19.3DOMINATED
Q9s4154.1%+4.1HIGH CARD
A5o4224.5%-25.5DOMINATED
A2s4337.5%-12.5HIGH CARD
K7s4435.3%-14.7DOMINATED
A6o4536.1%-13.9HIGH CARD
JTs4651.1%+1.1HIGH CARD
QTo4755.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
444844.8%-5.2PAIR VS CARDS
K6s4938.5%-11.5DOMINATED
A4o5038.6%-11.4HIGH CARD
Q8s5155.3%+5.3HIGH CARD
K8o5234.1%-15.9DOMINATED
A3o5339.0%-11.0HIGH CARD
K5s5447.5%-2.5HIGH CARD
J9s5553.0%+3.0HIGH CARD
Q9o5657.4%+7.4HIGH CARD
JTo5754.2%+4.2HIGH CARD
K7o5837.0%-13.0DOMINATED
K4s5952.9%+2.9HIGH CARD
A2o6039.4%-10.6HIGH CARD
Q7s6156.7%+6.7HIGH CARD
K6o6240.6%-9.4HIGH CARD
K3s6353.1%+3.1HIGH CARD
J8s6454.3%+4.3HIGH CARD
T9s6551.3%+1.3HIGH CARD
Q8o6658.9%+8.9HIGH CARD
336745.8%-4.2PAIR VS CARDS
Q6s6856.6%+6.6HIGH CARD
K2s6953.1%+3.1HIGH CARD
J9o7055.9%+5.9HIGH CARD
Q5s7270.6%+20.6DOMINATING
J7s7355.6%+5.6HIGH CARD
T8s7452.6%+2.6HIGH CARD
K4o7555.7%+5.7HIGH CARD
Q7o7660.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
Q4s7760.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
J8o7857.6%+7.6HIGH CARD
T9o7954.3%+4.3HIGH CARD
K3o8056.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
Q3s8160.5%+10.5HIGH CARD
Q6o8260.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
98s8352.7%+2.7HIGH CARD
T7s8453.8%+3.8HIGH CARD
J6s8556.5%+6.5HIGH CARD
K2o8656.2%+6.2HIGH CARD
Q5o8774.8%+24.8DOMINATING
228847.1%-2.9PAIR VS CARDS
Q2s8960.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
J5s9070.0%+20.0DOMINATING
T8o9155.8%+5.8HIGH CARD
J7o9258.7%+8.7HIGH CARD
J4s9360.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
97s9453.3%+3.3HIGH CARD
Q4o9564.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
T6s9655.0%+5.0HIGH CARD
J3s9760.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
98o9855.5%+5.5HIGH CARD
T7o9957.1%+7.1HIGH CARD
Q3o10064.3%+14.3HIGH CARD
87s10152.5%+2.5HIGH CARD
J6o10260.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
J2s10360.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
96s10454.5%+4.5HIGH CARD
Q2o10564.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
J5o10674.4%+24.4DOMINATING
T5s10770.2%+20.2DOMINATING
T4s10859.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
97o10956.4%+6.4HIGH CARD
86s11054.0%+4.0HIGH CARD
J4o11163.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
T6o11258.4%+8.4HIGH CARD
T3s11359.7%+9.7HIGH CARD
95s11468.5%+18.5DOMINATING
76s11553.2%+3.2HIGH CARD
J3o11663.9%+13.9HIGH CARD
87o11756.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
T2s11859.8%+9.8HIGH CARD
85s11967.7%+17.7DOMINATING
96o12057.8%+7.8HIGH CARD
T5o12174.3%+24.3DOMINATING
J2o12264.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
94s12360.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
75s12466.3%+16.3DOMINATING
T4o12563.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
93s12660.1%+10.1HIGH CARD
86o12757.3%+7.3HIGH CARD
65s12865.1%+15.1DOMINATING
95o12972.6%+22.6DOMINATING
84s13059.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
T3o13163.3%+13.3HIGH CARD
92s13260.2%+10.2HIGH CARD
76o13356.1%+6.1HIGH CARD
74s13458.2%+8.2HIGH CARD
T2o13563.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
64s13657.3%+7.3HIGH CARD
85o13771.6%+21.6DOMINATING
54s13866.1%+16.1DOMINATING
83s13960.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
94o14063.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
75o14169.9%+19.9DOMINATING
82s14260.4%+10.4HIGH CARD
73s14359.4%+9.4HIGH CARD
65o14469.0%+19.0DOMINATING
93o14563.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
53s14667.5%+17.5DOMINATING
63s14758.6%+8.6HIGH CARD
84o14863.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
92o14963.8%+13.8HIGH CARD
43s15060.8%+10.8HIGH CARD
74o15161.8%+11.8HIGH CARD
54o15270.0%+20.0DOMINATING
72s15360.6%+10.6HIGH CARD
52s15469.1%+19.1DOMINATING
64o15561.2%+11.2HIGH CARD
62s15660.0%+10.0HIGH CARD
83o15764.4%+14.4HIGH CARD
42s15862.1%+12.1HIGH CARD
82o15964.2%+14.2HIGH CARD
73o16063.1%+13.1HIGH CARD
53o16171.7%+21.7DOMINATING
63o16262.2%+12.2HIGH CARD
32s16362.4%+12.4HIGH CARD
43o16464.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
72o16564.5%+14.5HIGH CARD
52o16673.4%+23.4DOMINATING
62o16763.7%+13.7HIGH CARD
42o16866.2%+16.2HIGH CARD
32o16966.0%+16.0HIGH CARD

Showing 168 of 168 rows

Related

Nearby ranks
Suited / offsuit twin
K5s55.7%

FAQ

What is the equity of K5o?

53.2% against one random opponent, which ranks it 71 of 169. Six-handed (five opponents) it is 15.3%, and nine-handed (eight opponents) 9.6%.

How much better is K5o than K5s?

K5o is worth 53.2% and K5s 55.7%, a difference of 2.5 points — rank 71 versus rank 54.

How many of the 168 other hands does K5o beat?

It is a heads-up favourite over 116 hands and an underdog against 52. 0 opponents sit within one point of a 50/50 coinflip.

425 words / 40 distinct figures — Method