169hands
MENU
MATCHUPPREFLOPALL-IN

AKs vs JTs

AKs
VS
JTs
62.0%
equity for AKs — JTs takes 38.0%

Two unpaired hands with no shared rank — the higher cards usually run 60–65%.

AKs Win
61.8%
Tie
0.5%
AKs Lose
37.7%
Card combinations
16
AKs vs random
67.2% · #8
JTs vs random
57.5% · #46
Breakdown

Win, tie and loss for AKs

Win 61.8%Lose 37.7%

When AKs and JTs get all in before the flop, AKs wins 62.0% of the time and JTs takes 38.0%. Broken down, AKs wins outright 61.8%, chops 0.5% and loses 37.7% — a margin of 24.1 points. Two unpaired hands with no shared rank — the higher cards usually run 60–65%.

The same matchup shifts depending on how the suits overlap. With no shared suit the number is 61.4% (for example As Ks against Jh Th); with one shared suit it is 64.1% (As Ks against Js Ts). That is a spread of 2.73 points across the 16 distinct card combinations, and it comes almost entirely from whether the two hands are fighting over the same flush.

Add a third player holding a random hand and the split becomes AKs 47.2%, JTs 32.5%, random 20.3%. AKs gives up 14.8 points and JTs gives up 5.5, so the favourite loses more than the underdog does. Extra players always eat into the leader's share faster than into anyone else's.

Taken on their own, AKs is worth 67.2% against a random hand (rank 8 of 169) and JTs is worth 57.5% (rank 46). The gap between them in the ranking is only 9.7 points, yet head to head the gap is 24.1 points — a reminder that a ranking table and a direct matchup are two different questions.

Framed as a run of one hundred identical all-ins, AKs scoops roughly 62 pots, splits about one, and loses the remaining 38. Against eight random opponents rather than this one specific hand, AKs would be down to 22.4% and JTs to 18.1%, so the shape of this particular confrontation matters far more than either hand's standing in the overall ranking.

From JTs's side, 38.0% is the break-even point for calling an all-in at 1.63:1 pot odds. Put another way, the call is profitable as long as the amount you have to put in is less than 38.0% of the pot you are playing for. AKs holds the other 62.0% of that same pot.

Two caveats keep this figure honest. First, it is showdown equity across all 16 card combinations with five board cards still to come — there is no fold equity in it, so the value of shoving in practice is usually higher than the raw percentage suggests. Second, it assumes JTs really does hold exactly JTs; against the wider range a player would actually get all in with, AKs's 62.0% moves. Use the individual pages for AKs and JTs to see how each of them fares against all 168 other holdings before treating this single pairing as the whole picture.

By shared suits

Overlapping suits move the number

200,000 simulated showdowns per condition. The example column shows one concrete four-card layout.

ConditionExampleCombosAKs EquityWinTieLose
No shared suitAs Ks vs Jh Th1261.4%61.1%0.5%38.4%
One shared suitAs Ks vs Js Ts464.1%63.8%0.6%35.6%
Three-way

Adding a random third hand

200,000 simulated showdowns, with the third hand dealt at random each time.

AKs
47.2%
vs heads-up -14.8pt
JTs
32.5%
vs heads-up -5.5pt
Random third hand
20.3%
Player count

At a bigger table

Random opponentsAKsJTs
167.2%57.5%
250.3%41.9%
435.4%28.5%
822.4%18.1%

Related

FAQ

AKs or JTs — which is ahead preflop?

AKs is the favourite. AKs takes 62.0% and JTs 38.0%, a margin of 24.1 points, with 0.5% of hands ending in a chop.

Do the suits change AKs vs JTs?

Yes. With no shared suit it is 61.4%, and with one shared suit it is 64.1% — a swing of up to 2.73 points.

What happens three-way?

With one extra random hand in the pot the split is AKs 47.2%, JTs 32.5%, random 20.3%. AKs drops 14.8 points compared with heads-up.

431 words / 30 distinct figures — Method