AKs vs KQs

When AKs and KQs get all in before the flop, AKs wins 71.5% of the time and KQs takes 28.5%. Broken down, AKs wins outright 70.9%, chops 1.2% and loses 27.9% — a margin of 43 points. Domination — a shared rank turns this into a kicker fight, and kicker fights are lopsided.

The same matchup shifts depending on how the suits overlap. With no shared suit the number is 71.5% (for example As Ks against Kh Qh); with no shared suit it is 71.5% (As Ks against Kh Qh). That is a spread of 0 points across the 12 distinct card combinations, and it comes almost entirely from whether the two hands are fighting over the same flush.

Add a third player holding a random hand and the split becomes AKs 49.1%, KQs 25.3%, random 25.6%. AKs gives up 22.4 points and KQs gives up 3.2, so the favourite loses more than the underdog does. Extra players always eat into the leader's share faster than into anyone else's.

Taken on their own, AKs is worth 67.2% against a random hand (rank 8 of 169) and KQs is worth 63.4% (rank 16). The gap between them in the ranking is only 3.8 points, yet head to head the gap is 43 points — a reminder that a ranking table and a direct matchup are two different questions.

Framed as a run of one hundred identical all-ins, AKs scoops roughly 71 pots, splits about 1, and loses the remaining 28. Against eight random opponents rather than this one specific hand, AKs would be down to 22.4% and KQs to 20.4%, so the shape of this particular confrontation matters far more than either hand's standing in the overall ranking.

From KQs's side, 28.5% is the break-even point for calling an all-in at 2.51:1 pot odds. Put another way, the call is profitable as long as the amount you have to put in is less than 28.5% of the pot you are playing for. AKs holds the other 71.5% of that same pot.

Two caveats keep this figure honest. First, it is showdown equity across all 12 card combinations with five board cards still to come — there is no fold equity in it, so the value of shoving in practice is usually higher than the raw percentage suggests. Second, it assumes KQs really does hold exactly KQs; against the wider range a player would actually get all in with, AKs's 71.5% moves. Use the individual pages for AKs and KQs to see how each of them fares against all 168 other holdings before treating this single pairing as the whole picture.